LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9   Report Post  
Old January 17th 06, 02:36 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
K4YZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default Policy Issue: Canadian Amateurs to Lose 220-222 MHz


an_old_friend wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
Jeff Hermann say use it or lose it is hogwash.

Really?

How much is 220-222 used in Canada?

Will 222-225 be overcrowded because
of the loss of 220-222?

What justification can there be for hams having
5 MHz of prime VHF spectrum if those 5 MHz
aren't being fully utilized?

Hey clown,


Brian,

I'm not a "clown".


not in brains opinion and not in my own


But considering who and what the two of you are, that doesn't lend
much credence to the act.

What's with the name-calling? Are you desperate for
attention? Or do you think such behavior is somehow
justified because I disproved your claim?


nah it is your blah sey attitude about it


Nice try, Markie. A dictionary would have been better, though.

you get into a lather at suggesting you neeed what you see as your BW
in HF but you blithely talk about giving away VHF as if it wee nothing


No one said it was nothing, but these arguments about the
protection of our allocations have been going on for DECADES now yet
there is is relief.

The Spectrum Protection Act or some other legislation sounding
like it has been in committee ump-teen times now, Markie...How many
times have YOU written your representitives (in English) demanding that
they pass it?

I asked significant, relevant questions about the use
of 220-222 MHz by Canadian hams. Try answering
them - if you can.


no you did not


Sure he did. That you don't understand them or can't read them is
not relevent.

In case you didn't know, 220-225 is not worldwide
exclusive amateur territory. If hams don't use it
enough, why shouldn't it be reassigned to
services that *will* use it?


more of your lectureing attitute try to hope from clown to ###hole?


What's "lectureing" about it, Markie...!??!

It's a stone-cold fact.

The 220-225Mhz band wound up in North American Amateur's hands for
the most part as a buffer between commercial users and the Armed Forces
"band" from 225Mhz to 400Mhz (among other reasons). It was never meant
to be an unrevokable allocation...(Not that any are...) That we've
kept it this long has been nothing short of a miracle.

Steve, K4YZ

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kalamazoo Cuckoo' ND8V GLENN B General 0 October 19th 04 03:15 AM
Once upon a time in America there came to be a giant of an organization called the American Radio Relay League (ARRL). KC8QJP General 3 October 11th 04 10:44 AM
New ARRL Proposal N2EY Policy 331 March 4th 04 12:02 AM
The Pool N2EY Policy 515 February 22nd 04 03:14 AM
Some comments on the NCVEC petition D. Stussy Policy 13 August 5th 03 04:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017