| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
January 18th 06, 04:51 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
Policy Issue: Canadian Amateurs to Lose 220-222 MHz
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: raped_an_old_underaged_boyfriend wrote: On 17 Jan 2006 06:36:01 -0800, K4YZ wrote: The 220-225Mhz band wound up in North American Amateur's hands for the most part as a buffer between commercial users and the Armed Forces "band" from 225Mhz to 400Mhz (among other reasons). It was never meant to be an unrevokable allocation...(Not that any are...) That we've kept it this long has been nothing short of a miracle. If they loes it we shoud give them half of oeurs becaues we don't need all that much and we are theyr friends. I say give them a megahurtz from 221 too 222. Marky, you can't even operate 2 meters worth a darn. I do ok I am getting to like 2m SSB more consitant than 6m SSB and queiter to operate It's quieter for you because no one wants to talk to an idiot. oTOH 222 is even quieter but few people on and 440 sssb i can leave on all day and still satnd the static but still make some contact even a bit on 1.2 g You're talking to someone on 1.2 grams? Marky snorts cocaine! all nice bands the range kida suck but range is being worked on by the FCC I am wondering how it is you think the FCC has anything to do with the propagation of the bands at all...?!?! BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!! |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Kalamazoo Cuckoo' ND8V | General | |||
| Once upon a time in America there came to be a giant of an organization called the American Radio Relay League (ARRL). | General | |||
| New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
| The Pool | Policy | |||
| Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
Hybrid Mode
