Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Jan 2006 19:30:39 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
an_old_friend wrote: you asked I would refrain from sexual reference at all I said not I would and generaly do refrain from injecting sex into a thread I will conittinue to do so But you HAVE done it in the past. nope I have only responded I have asked or demanded if you prefer the pharse that you stop making alageation (true or not) about peoples sexuall orientation indeed Iam not bother the off color joke but saying some is gay or that they or their family has AIDs is over the top And I told YOU MONTHS ago that if you stop doing it, I wouldn't comment on it. What you THEN did was go on your NG spamming spree rubbing it all around. whiuch does not answer why you brought it up in the first place I also demand you stop making statements beyond the scope of LPN license yes this demand only applies to you but you choose to get that license and with it the extra power and responsiblity I've not made any statements "beyond the scope of LPN" no matter how YOU define or interpret the regulations, Markie. that is BIG lie If I am ddefining it then you clearly just lied like wise I have asked that you stop your mocking of religion and stop lyying about what people religion entials I don't mock your "religion" Markie. You're free to cut off all the chicken heads and draw all the pentagrams you care to, or whatever it is you prefer to do. Have fun. more mocking proving you a liar I do not do either Yes, you do. You've initiated threads SPECIFICALLY questioning Dave Heil's beliefs and attemtping to discredit him based upon "religious" comments that YOU initiated. I did not mock him or his religion I pointed tht he was failing to uphold the stanards of his religion I do inquire as why some folks profess a religion but don't seem to follow its teaching, esp after claiming moral was related to RRAP if someone beleive s in religion X but does not follow that religions teachings it is a valid point to bring up. I've read the Bible pretty thoroughly, Markie. I've even studied the Koran a bit. I do not find a single word in either about RRAP...Although I guess I could do a "fundamentalist" trick and stretch the "eye-for-an-eye" "teachings" that each profess and apply it here. you OTOH presume to lie and state what gods I beleive exist in addtion to being a lie (you clearly don't and this is not the NG to educate you on my religion) ishas no bearing on the topicradio particularly Ham radio and that rules athat do and/or should should govern it or even relate to the character of the target Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: wrote: \more multiation an_old_freak wrote: you asked I would refrain from sexual reference at all I said not I would and generaly do refrain from injecting sex into a thread I will conittinue to do so But you HAVE done it in the past. nope I have only responded Absolutely, positively outright lying, Mork. nope nothing but truth on part flsuh |