Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
get something straight for once in your misbegotten carer here on RRAP
you asked I would refrain from sexual reference at all
I said not I would and generaly do refrain from injecting sex into a thread I will conittinue to do so I have asked or demanded if you prefer the pharse that you stop making alageation (true or not) about peoples sexuall orientation indeed Iam not bother the off color joke but saying some is gay or that they or their family has AIDs is over the top I also demand you stop making statements beyond the scope of LPN license yes this demand only applies to you but you choose to get that license and with it the extra power and responsiblity like wise I have asked that you stop your mocking of religion and stop lyying about what people religion entials I do not do either I do inquire as why some folks profess a religion but don't seem to follow its teaching, esp after claiming moral was related to RRAP if someone beleive s in religion X but does not follow that religions teachings it is a valid point to bring up. you OTOH presume to lie and state what gods I beleive exist, in addtion to being a lie (you clearly don't and this is not the NG to educate you on my religion) ishas no bearing on the topicradio particularly Ham radio and that rules athat do and/or should should govern it or even relate to the character of the target |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Markie: I Will Type This Slowly Because I Know You Can't Read Very Fast
an_old_friend wrote: you asked I would refrain from sexual reference at all I said not I would and generaly do refrain from injecting sex into a thread I will conittinue to do so But you HAVE done it in the past. I have asked or demanded if you prefer the pharse that you stop making alageation (true or not) about peoples sexuall orientation indeed Iam not bother the off color joke but saying some is gay or that they or their family has AIDs is over the top And I told YOU MONTHS ago that if you stop doing it, I wouldn't comment on it. What you THEN did was go on your NG spamming spree rubbing it all around. I also demand you stop making statements beyond the scope of LPN license yes this demand only applies to you but you choose to get that license and with it the extra power and responsiblity I've not made any statements "beyond the scope of LPN" no matter how YOU define or interpret the regulations, Markie. like wise I have asked that you stop your mocking of religion and stop lyying about what people religion entials I don't mock your "religion" Markie. You're free to cut off all the chicken heads and draw all the pentagrams you care to, or whatever it is you prefer to do. Have fun. I do not do either Yes, you do. You've initiated threads SPECIFICALLY questioning Dave Heil's beliefs and attemtping to discredit him based upon "religious" comments that YOU initiated. I do inquire as why some folks profess a religion but don't seem to follow its teaching, esp after claiming moral was related to RRAP if someone beleive s in religion X but does not follow that religions teachings it is a valid point to bring up. I've read the Bible pretty thoroughly, Markie. I've even studied the Koran a bit. I do not find a single word in either about RRAP...Although I guess I could do a "fundamentalist" trick and stretch the "eye-for-an-eye" "teachings" that each profess and apply it here. you OTOH presume to lie "presume to lie"...?!?! No Markie, YOU are the archived, professed and bragged-on liar here. and state what gods I beleive exist I've never said what "gods" exist or don't exist, Markie. in addtion to being a lie (you clearly don't and this is not the NG to educate you on my religion) ishas no bearing on the topicradio particularly Ham radio and that rules athat do and/or should should govern it or even relate to the character of the target Markie, unless you care to dismiss those parts of American law that we all cherish that pertain to "freedom of speech", then there's not a whole lot you or anyone else can do about stopping ANYone from commenting on any subject at anytime. There are countless threads in this NG that discuss anything BUT radio. Start your survey by reading over Lennie's OT posts. They're classic. Steve, K4YZ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
more of steve trying evade his own acts
On 10 Jan 2006 19:30:39 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
an_old_friend wrote: you asked I would refrain from sexual reference at all I said not I would and generaly do refrain from injecting sex into a thread I will conittinue to do so But you HAVE done it in the past. no I have not I have asked or demanded if you prefer the pharse that you stop making alageation (true or not) about peoples sexuall orientation indeed Iam not bother the off color joke but saying some is gay or that they or their family has AIDs is over the top And I told YOU MONTHS ago that if you stop doing it, I wouldn't comment on it. What you THEN did was go on your NG spamming spree rubbing it all around. you said and then kept on doing you lied I also demand you stop making statements beyond the scope of LPN license yes this demand only applies to you but you choose to get that license and with it the extra power and responsiblity I've not made any statements "beyond the scope of LPN" no matter how YOU define or interpret the regulations, Markie. yes you have like wise I have asked that you stop your mocking of religion and stop lyying about what people religion entials I don't mock your "religion" Markie. You're free to cut off all the chicken heads and draw all the pentagrams you care to, or whatever it is you prefer to do. Have fun. yes you do you just did I do not do either Yes, you do. nope You've initiated threads SPECIFICALLY questioning Dave Heil's beliefs and attemtping to discredit him based upon "religious" comments that YOU initiated. I have questioned his devotion to his faith yes if you want to question mine and base those question on the basis of facts or concerns fine I have objection and never will when you claim I kill chickens I object I do inquire as why some folks profess a religion but don't seem to follow its teaching, esp after claiming moral was related to RRAP if someone beleive s in religion X but does not follow that religions teachings it is a valid point to bring up. I've read the Bible pretty thoroughly, Markie. I've even studied the Koran a bit. I do not find a single word in either about RRAP...Although I guess I could do a "fundamentalist" trick and stretch the "eye-for-an-eye" "teachings" that each profess and apply it here. more evasion you OTOH presume to lie "presume to lie"...?!?! No Markie, YOU are the archived, professed and bragged-on liar here. Mark morgan aught on tape.. that is your post your lie and state what gods I beleive exist I've never said what "gods" exist or don't exist, Markie. you have said I belive tha Chist isa god In pojnt of Fact I do, for differences reason i supect than Dave when you said I did not you lied in addtion to being a lie (you clearly don't and this is not the NG to educate you on my religion) ishas no bearing on the topicradio particularly Ham radio and that rules athat do and/or should should govern it or even relate to the character of the target Markie, unless you care to dismiss those parts of American law that we all cherish that pertain to "freedom of speech", then there's not a whole lot you or anyone else can do about stopping ANYone from commenting on any subject at anytime. never said I could but you claim you can to me There are countless threads in this NG that discuss anything BUT radio. Start your survey by reading over Lennie's OT posts. They're classic. I am discusing you not lenn but in point of fact I see few of them all that off topic Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
More Markie Mularkie
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
More Markie Mularkie
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 10 Jan 2006 19:30:39 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: an_old_friend wrote: you asked I would refrain from sexual reference at all I said not I would and generaly do refrain from injecting sex into a thread I will conittinue to do so But you HAVE done it in the past. no I have not Sure you have. nope Yes, you ahve. you lied flsuh No, I didn't. And it's "flush", you illiterate moron. I can't believe you're so stuid as to not be able to get just five letters in a row correct. Steve, K4YZ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
why does steve cling to lie that everyone else is responible for HIS posts?
On 10 Jan 2006 22:39:25 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 10 Jan 2006 19:30:39 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: an_old_friend wrote: you asked I would refrain from sexual reference at all I said not I would and generaly do refrain from injecting sex into a thread I will conittinue to do so But you HAVE done it in the past. no I have not Sure you have. nope Yes, you ahve. I did not post Mark Morgan caught on tape .. you did you lied therfore in claim I am the onee that brings it up you lied flsuh No, I didn't. And it's "flush", you illiterate moron. I can't believe you're so stuid as to not be able to get just five letters in a row correct. Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
steve contiues to lie about Mark Morgan caught on tape
On 11 Jan 2006 03:12:02 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: On 10 Jan 2006 22:39:25 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 10 Jan 2006 19:30:39 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: an_old_friend wrote: you asked I would refrain from sexual reference at all I said not I would and generaly do refrain from injecting sex into a thread I will conittinue to do so But you HAVE done it in the past. no I have not Sure you have. nope Yes, you ahve. I did not post Mark Morgan caught on tape .. you did Prove that you weren't caught. you admited to lying you lied therfore in claim I am the onee that brings it up Prove that I lied. I did or more properly you did but the court will not care if you do in fact file you will be made to defend your slader you lied flsuh No, I didn't. And it's "flush", you illiterate moron. I can't believe you're so stuid as to not be able to get just five letters in a row correct. Just F I V E little letters, Markie. not worth the effort Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
why this lie as well steve
On 10 Jan 2006 19:30:39 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
an_old_friend wrote: you asked I would refrain from sexual reference at all I said not I would and generaly do refrain from injecting sex into a thread I will conittinue to do so But you HAVE done it in the past. nope I have only responded I have asked or demanded if you prefer the pharse that you stop making alageation (true or not) about peoples sexuall orientation indeed Iam not bother the off color joke but saying some is gay or that they or their family has AIDs is over the top And I told YOU MONTHS ago that if you stop doing it, I wouldn't comment on it. What you THEN did was go on your NG spamming spree rubbing it all around. whiuch does not answer why you brought it up in the first place I also demand you stop making statements beyond the scope of LPN license yes this demand only applies to you but you choose to get that license and with it the extra power and responsiblity I've not made any statements "beyond the scope of LPN" no matter how YOU define or interpret the regulations, Markie. that is BIG lie If I am ddefining it then you clearly just lied like wise I have asked that you stop your mocking of religion and stop lyying about what people religion entials I don't mock your "religion" Markie. You're free to cut off all the chicken heads and draw all the pentagrams you care to, or whatever it is you prefer to do. Have fun. more mocking proving you a liar I do not do either Yes, you do. You've initiated threads SPECIFICALLY questioning Dave Heil's beliefs and attemtping to discredit him based upon "religious" comments that YOU initiated. I did not mock him or his religion I pointed tht he was failing to uphold the stanards of his religion I do inquire as why some folks profess a religion but don't seem to follow its teaching, esp after claiming moral was related to RRAP if someone beleive s in religion X but does not follow that religions teachings it is a valid point to bring up. I've read the Bible pretty thoroughly, Markie. I've even studied the Koran a bit. I do not find a single word in either about RRAP...Although I guess I could do a "fundamentalist" trick and stretch the "eye-for-an-eye" "teachings" that each profess and apply it here. you OTOH presume to lie and state what gods I beleive exist in addtion to being a lie (you clearly don't and this is not the NG to educate you on my religion) ishas no bearing on the topicradio particularly Ham radio and that rules athat do and/or should should govern it or even relate to the character of the target Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |