Interested? Start here with the weekly FAQ!
 

You continue to behave like a 5-year-old

Peter wrote:
On 3 Feb 2006 13:11:05 -0800, "G4KFK" wrote:


Orator For Decency wrote:
There is no animosity expressed by urging those of a technical
bent to join us; neither is there any animosity in standing apart
from those who are not our fellows by any stretch of the
imagination.

Mike G4KFK
snip


Superb Mike... I didn't know you had such music talent!

I reckon we could sell a few copies at various rallies if it were put
to music :-)

Any suggestions for a suitable title?


Peter, G3PHO

Interested? Start here with the weekly FAQ!
 

You continue to behave like a 5-year-old.

Peter wrote:
On 3 Feb 2006 14:00:07 -0800, "an_old_friend"
wrote:

How long did it take, for crying out loud?

Google the first line ... the truth is out there :-)

indeed parody of the model of a modern major general

Pnezance Ithink but i am a real student of G&S


You are correct ... the Pirates of Penzance. We could call this new
one the Chimp of Chippenham !

Peter, G3PHO

Interested? Start here with the weekly FAQ!
 

Strange, since he is a self confessed CBer... I wonder if he whips himself
with flails before he goes to bed..?

--
huLLy

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...81554735098778

Interested? Start here with the weekly FAQ!
 

Indeed, in consideration that the FAQ is maintaining a
stance for the traditions of _REAL_ Ham Radio, the
traditions of technical motivation and gentlemanly
conduct, against the influx of the Mongolian Hordes
of CBers of one sort or another, it would be reasonable
to assume that the chorus of abusive and infantile
objectors are all from the CB camp, and therefore
providing graphic illustration of why it is necessary to
take this stance now.

It would seem that the CBer-Masquerading-As-A-Radio-Ham
is no recent phenomena - there are some hoilding licences
issued in the G4K-- series.

Irrespective of when such licences were issued, public
outbursts of Childish Behaviour (CB) do the cause of
Radio Hammery no good at all.

Orator For Decency wrote:
There now appears to be a chorus of rather silly
and childish individuals who are taking delight in the
abusive remarks put about by each other.

Such Childish Behaviour (CB) does nothing for
the public's perception of Radio Hammery, and,
indeed, may well serve to dismay those who
are potential candidates to become _REAL_
Radio Hams.

Shame on all those who exhibit such infantile glee.

Interested? Start here with the weekly FAQ!
 

Orator For Decency wrote:
Indeed, in consideration that the FAQ is maintaining a
stance for the traditions of _REAL_ Ham Radio, the
traditions of technical motivation and gentlemanly
conduct, against the influx of the Mongolian Hordes
of CBers of one sort or another, it would be reasonable
to assume that the chorus of abusive and infantile
objectors are all from the CB camp, and therefore
providing graphic illustration of why it is necessary to
take this stance now.

It would seem that the CBer-Masquerading-As-A-Radio-Ham
is no recent phenomena - there are some hoilding licences
issued in the G4K-- series.

Irrespective of when such licences were issued, public
outbursts of Childish Behaviour (CB) do the cause of
Radio Hammery no good at all.

Orator For Decency wrote:
There now appears to be a chorus of rather silly
and childish individuals who are taking delight in the
abusive remarks put about by each other.

Such Childish Behaviour (CB) does nothing for
the public's perception of Radio Hammery, and,
indeed, may well serve to dismay those who
are potential candidates to become _REAL_
Radio Hams.

Shame on all those who exhibit such infantile glee.


Look who's talking, or should that be stalking?

Come to think of it, you would make a fine dung beetle, rolling along a
huge ball a crap, the crap being your over inflated opinion of yourself.

Interested? Start here with the weekly FAQ!
 

Orator For Decency wrote:
Indeed, in consideration that the FAQ is maintaining a
stance for the traditions of _REAL_ Ham Radio, the
traditions of technical motivation and gentlemanly
conduct, against the influx of the Mongolian Hordes
of CBers of one sort or another, it would be reasonable

"Mongolian Hordes of CBers...."???

Have you had a CAT scan lately?

73
Mike G4KFK

Interested? Start here with the weekly FAQ!
 

On 3 Feb 2006 15:39:17 -0800, "G4KFK" wrote:


Peter wrote:
I reckon we could sell a few copies at various rallies if it were put
to music :-)

We'd need a few more tracks. Maybe:
"You gotta troll with it" by Oasis
"Rant music" by Adam and The Ants
"You won't work another fool M3" by The New Seekers
"I gotta brand new M3 licence" by Melanie
"Milk and methylated spirit" by Dr Feelgood
"Meths in the jar" by Thin Lizzy
"I go to sheep" by The Pretenders
"R.S.C.B" by The Village People


It's getting better each hour!

Interested? Start here with the weekly FAQ!
 

"Peter" wrote in message
...
On 3 Feb 2006 15:39:17 -0800, "G4KFK" wrote:


Peter wrote:
I reckon we could sell a few copies at various rallies if it were put
to music :-)

We'd need a few more tracks. Maybe:
"You gotta troll with it" by Oasis
"Rant music" by Adam and The Ants
"You won't work another fool M3" by The New Seekers
"I gotta brand new M3 licence" by Melanie
"Milk and methylated spirit" by Dr Feelgood
"Meths in the jar" by Thin Lizzy
"I go to sheep" by The Pretenders
"R.S.C.B" by The Village People


It's getting better each hour!

Can we rename this group to UK.80.METRES ?


--
drei unt siebzig de G1LVN
http://www.outpimp.com/?x=481566961
--------------------------------------
read rfc1855.txt first and
remove .invalid to reply

Interested? Start here with the weekly FAQ!
 

From the shack of G1LVN wrote:
Can we rename this group to UK.80.METRES ?

No - there aren't enough Germans here.

Interested? Start here with the weekly FAQ!
 

In uk.radio.amateur G4KFK wrote:
: With apologies to Gilbert and Sullivan :-)

Bravo!
--
73 Chris Cox N0UK, G4JEC, ex-AB0CN