Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Orator For Decency wrote: The personal and insulting remarks below are very much those that are typical of CBers - Childish Broadcasters - the very people whom the FAQ criticises. Such remarks do not fit in the gentlemanly traditions of _REAL_ Ham Radio. I am not familiar with the Yankland licensing schemes. Is "W5EGO" perhaps some for of CB licence - the abusive personal style quoted below would seem to suggest so. There is no attempt to demean anybody by a taxonomy of those who are _REAL_ Radio Hams and those who are CBers of one sort or another. Mike Andrews wrote: Yes, indeed. You can discount without loss anything the writer of that so-called "FAQ" has written, is writing, or will ever write. He attempts to demean people who have attained heights he can't even see, much less comprehend. He has nothing to say, and insists on doing so at length. Don't let him put you off anything. Jump in; the water's fine. -- Mike Andrews W5EGO Tired old sysadmin EVANS IS YOUR BLOODY RECORD STUCK, OR ARE YOUR BRAINCELLS LOOPING DUE TO YOUR DRUG ABUSE? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FAQ - Is anyone interested in _REAL_ Ham Radio any more? | Policy | |||
RW NewsBytes Weekly Digest | Broadcasting | |||
Radio World NewsBytes Weekly Digest | Broadcasting | |||
A weekly guide to Ham Radio | Homebrew | |||
A weekly guide to Ham Radio | Homebrew |