Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
For those of you who have the necessary technical
motivation to understand how things work, have become interested in Ham Radio but are confused by the attitudes and activities of those who are really no more than CBers-Masquerading-As-Radio-Hams, I append a short article explaining the difference..... What is Ham Radio? Ham Radio is a technical pursuit for those who are interested in the science of radio wave propagation and who are also interested in the way that their radios function. It has a long-standing tradition of providing a source of engineers who are born naturals. Ham Radio awakens in its aficionados a whole-life fascination with all things technical and gives an all-abiding curiosity to improve one's scientific knowledge. It's a great swimming pool, please dive in! This excitement causes a wish to share the experience with ones fellow man, and shows itself in the gentlemanly traditions of Ham Radio. Radio Hams are qualified to design, build and then operate their own pieces of equipment. They do this with gusto, and also repair and modify their own equipment. The excitement that drives a Radio Ham starts with relatively simple technologies at first, perhaps making his own Wimshurst machine and primary cells. Small pieces of test equipment follow, possibly multimeters and signal generators. Then comes receivers and transmitters. It is with the latter that communication with like-minded technically motivated people takes off. The scope for technical development grows with the years and now encompasses DSP and DDS. There is also a great deal of excitement in the areas of computer programming to be learnt and applied. The technical excitement motivates Radio Hams to compete with each other to determine who has designed and manufactured the best-quality station. This competitiveness is found in DXing, competitions and fox-hunts. -----OOOOO---- However, beware! A Ham Radio licence is such a desirable thing to have that there are large numbers of people who wish to be thought of as Radio Hams when, in fact, they are nothing of the kind! Usually such people are a variation of the CB Radio hobbyist; they buy their radios off the shelf and send them back to be repaired; they are not interested in technical discussion and sneer at those who are; they have no idea how their radios work inside and have no wish to find out; they are free with rather silly personal insults; they have not satisfied any technical qualification and their licences prevent the use of self-designed-and-built equipment. These CB types engage in the competitive activities with their Cheque-Book-purchased off-the-shelf radios in a forlorn effort to prove that they are Radio Hams. No _REAL_ Radio Hams are deceived by such people! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It has a long-standing
tradition of providing a source of engineers who are born naturals. ============================ On the contrary. There's a long-standing tradition of born-natural engineers becoming radio amateurs. Don't bother quoting a few exceptions to the rule. --- Reg |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Airy R. Bean" wrote in
: For those of you who have the necessary technical motivation to understand how things work, have become interested in Ham Radio but are confused by the attitudes and activities of those who are really no more than CBers-Masquerading-As-Radio-Hams, I append a short article explaining the difference..... I offered help with your supposed attempt to design and build a radio, to host some webpages, etc. You have until 23:59 21/04/03 and then the offer is removed. I presume you've ignored my email. So much for me trying to promote gentlemanly behaviour. Leigh.... (PS - discovered the eham.net site yet for technical discussions Gareth?) -- #!/bin/sh {who;} {last;} {pause;} {grep;} {touch;} {unzip;} mount /dev/girl -t {wet;} {fsck;} {fsck;} {fsck;} {fsck;} echo yes yes yes {yes;} umount {/dev/girl;zip;} rm -rf {wet.spot;} {sleep;} finger: permission denied |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Airy R. Bean" wrote in
: For those of you who have the necessary technical motivation to understand how things work, have become interested in Ham Radio but are confused by the attitudes and activities of those who are really no more than CBers-Masquerading-As-Radio-Hams, I append a short article explaining the difference..... How about you widen the circulation of this article to more rec.radio.amateur groups Gareth. Tell everyone where they are going wrong. Or are you too chicken? Leigh... |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No. It is not short-sighted. Ham Radio is a technical
pursuit with technical privileges and I wish it to remain so. Any sitting-on-the-sidelines while the Mongolian hordes of turnip-brained CBers pour in is ill-advised because the powers-that-be will come to perceive Ham Radio to have become indistinguishable from CB Radio and the technical privileges will be in danger of being withdrawn. Far from being short-sighted, the viewpoint that I express is long-sighted. "Dr. Anton T. Squeegee" wrote in message ... In article , says... For those of you who have the necessary technical motivation to understand how things work, have become interested in Ham Radio but are confused by the attitudes and activities of those who are really no more than CBers-Masquerading-As-Radio-Hams, I append a short article explaining the difference..... For someone who claims such a broad base of knowledge, your viewpoint is pretty short-sighted. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... top-posting corrected ... Please don't top-post! "Dr. Anton T. Squeegee" wrote in message For someone who claims such a broad base of knowledge, your viewpoint is pretty short-sighted. No. It is not short-sighted. Ham Radio is a technical pursuit with technical privileges and I wish it to remain so. Well, that's fine. You can, in your own way, make your participation in amateur radio as technical as you want. HOWEVER -- Technical pursuits are NOT the only reason the SERVICE exists. You apparently did not take my advice to read the material at the links I provided on Part 97 of the FCC regs, more specifically the section which defines what the amateur service is. Had you done so, you would have read that there's a lot more than the technical side involved. Any sitting-on-the-sidelines while the Mongolian hordes of turnip-brained CBers pour in is ill-advised because the powers-that-be will come to perceive Ham Radio to have become indistinguishable from CB Radio and the technical privileges will be in danger of being withdrawn. blink You know, up until you made that utterly inaccurate and utterly loony statement, I was under the impression that you could be reasonable. Far from being short-sighted, the viewpoint that I express is long-sighted. You are, of course, entitled to your opinion. I would, however, point out that the "Mongolian hordes" (are we being racist now as well?) have been "pouring in" for the last several decades. While there has been a noticeable (and, IMO, lamentable) decline in the number of tinkerers, as it were, amateur radio is still around, and I think it will continue to be around for many moons to come. For the sake of avoiding newsgroup clutter, I will no longer debate these points with you. It is apparent that you do not care enough to take Part 97 (or whatever its UK equivalent is) seriously. God help whatever newcomer asks you an 'elmer' type question about amateur radio... *PLONK!* -- Dr. Anton T. Squeegee, Director, Dutch Surrealist Plumbing Institute. (Known to some as Bruce Lane, ARS KC7GR, kyrrin (a/t) bluefeathertech[d=o=t]calm -- www.bluefeathertech.com "If Salvador Dali had owned a computer, would it have been equipped with surreal ports?" |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you wish to make some point in debate, then make it
yourself. I'm not going to go away and learn up on your failings, OM! "Dr. Anton T. Squeegee" wrote in message ... You apparently did not take my advice to read the material at the links I provided on Part 97 of the FCC regs, more specifically the section which defines what the amateur service is. Had you done so, you would have read that there's a lot more than the technical side involved. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
WRONG!
"Dr. Anton T. Squeegee" wrote in message ... HOWEVER -- Technical pursuits are NOT the only reason the SERVICE exists. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Airy R. Bean" wrote in
: WRONG! "Dr. Anton T. Squeegee" wrote in message ... HOWEVER -- Technical pursuits are NOT the only reason the SERVICE exists. Gareth - do us all a _FAVOUR_ - take your silly little squabbles to email. Shows true usenet netiquette. There's a good girl. -- #!/bin/sh {who;} {last;} {pause;} {grep;} {touch;} {unzip;} mount /dev/girl -t {wet;} {fsck;} {fsck;} {fsck;} {fsck;} echo yes yes yes {yes;} umount {/dev/girl;zip;} rm -rf {wet.spot;} {sleep;} finger: permission denied |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415  September 24, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415  September 24, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402  June 25, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402  June 25, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | Dx |