Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Bile wrote:
wrote:
Dave Bile wrote:
N0VFP wrote:
Dave Bile wrote:
wrote:
Dave Vile wrote:
nothing of importance
Yawn! Poor stalker boy.
*snicker*
Hmm, the same reaction of your mail order bride when you drop drawers.

Payback, as they say, rOgEr.
Let's see, You have pictures of your house on the internet. Accessiable
by the public.
"Accessible", not "Accessiable".
"Valley" not "velley"
Ohhhhh. Roger's achievement took place in the valley?
We weren't dicussing Roger's achievements, we were discussing your
"velley" spelling.
The last time I asked about Roger's acheivements, the response was "velley".

No, you made a comment about the typo of "accessible", straw grasper.

You'd better read the sequence again, Wedgie Wiseman.

"Accesiable by the public" is a
clause, not a sentence.
Still doesn't change the fact you are stalking Roger Wiseman, "velley"
boy.
The facts say otherwise, wedgie boy.
Going to another person's house and taking pictures of it for the
specific purpose of posting them isn't stalking? I'm afraid the law
would disagree.
Test it. Everything will be on the table--e-mail, newsgroup posts,
witnesses to a face-to-face encounter, telephone records--all of it.

Worried?

Do I sound worried?


Yet, you make the effort to go to somebody's house and
take pictures of it and post them. Looks like you are the stalker,
delusional boy.
It wasn't much of an effort at all. You did what you did. I told you
what I'd do in response. I did it. The stalker is getting his payback.
Apparently, you are the stalker. And you just admitted it.
What I meant, I said above.
You said you'd stalk him some more.
I said that whatever you do, you'll get back in spades.


So you intend to stalk Roger some more.

I intend to respond to any unpleasantry you undertake.

You should never doubt me. For your every unpleasant action, there'll
be an unpleasant (for you) reaction.
Oh, your payback has just begun, stalker.
Remember, an unpleasant (for you) reaction.
You keep that in mind, too, stalker.
I'm keeping it very much in mind. I'm calling your bluff, weasel.

You couldn't call anything, dumbass.

It looks as if I already did so.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Bile wrote:
wrote:
Dave Bile wrote:
N0VFP wrote:
Dave Bile wrote:
wrote:
Dave Vile wrote:
nothing of importance
Yawn! Poor stalker boy.
*snicker*
Hmm, the same reaction of your mail order bride when you drop drawers.

Payback, as they say, rOgEr.
Let's see, You have pictures of your house on the internet. Accessiable
by the public.
"Accessible", not "Accessiable".
"Valley" not "velley"
Ohhhhh. Roger's achievement took place in the valley?
We weren't dicussing Roger's achievements, we were discussing your
"velley" spelling.
The last time I asked about Roger's acheivements, the response was "velley".

No, you made a comment about the typo of "accessible", straw grasper.

You'd better read the sequence again, Wedgie Wiseman.

You'd better have your glasses checked, doofus.

"Accesiable by the public" is a
clause, not a sentence.
Still doesn't change the fact you are stalking Roger Wiseman, "velley"
boy.
The facts say otherwise, wedgie boy.
Going to another person's house and taking pictures of it for the
specific purpose of posting them isn't stalking? I'm afraid the law
would disagree.
Test it. Everything will be on the table--e-mail, newsgroup posts,
witnesses to a face-to-face encounter, telephone records--all of it.

Worried?

Do I sound worried?

Yep.


Yet, you make the effort to go to somebody's house and
take pictures of it and post them. Looks like you are the stalker,
delusional boy.
It wasn't much of an effort at all. You did what you did. I told you
what I'd do in response. I did it. The stalker is getting his payback.
Apparently, you are the stalker. And you just admitted it.
What I meant, I said above.
You said you'd stalk him some more.
I said that whatever you do, you'll get back in spades.


So you intend to stalk Roger some more.

I intend to respond to any unpleasantry you undertake.

So you admit to being too stupid and lazy to use a killfile.

You should never doubt me. For your every unpleasant action, there'll
be an unpleasant (for you) reaction.
Oh, your payback has just begun, stalker.
Remember, an unpleasant (for you) reaction.
You keep that in mind, too, stalker.
I'm keeping it very much in mind. I'm calling your bluff, weasel.

You couldn't call anything, dumbass.

It looks as if I already did so.

Only to a dumbass like you.

Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Bile wrote:
wrote:
Dave Bile wrote:
N0VFP wrote:
Dave Bile wrote:
wrote:
Dave Vile wrote:

"Accesiable by the public" is a
clause, not a sentence.
Still doesn't change the fact you are stalking Roger Wiseman, "velley"
boy.
The facts say otherwise, wedgie boy.
Going to another person's house and taking pictures of it for the
specific purpose of posting them isn't stalking? I'm afraid the law
would disagree.
Test it. Everything will be on the table--e-mail, newsgroup posts,
witnesses to a face-to-face encounter, telephone records--all of it.
Worried?
Do I sound worried?

Yep.

None of my responses indicate worry on my part. You continue to
underestimate people.

Yet, you make the effort to go to somebody's house and
take pictures of it and post them. Looks like you are the stalker,
delusional boy.
It wasn't much of an effort at all. You did what you did. I told you
what I'd do in response. I did it. The stalker is getting his payback.
Apparently, you are the stalker. And you just admitted it.
What I meant, I said above.
You said you'd stalk him some more.
I said that whatever you do, you'll get back in spades.

So you intend to stalk Roger some more.
I intend to respond to any unpleasantry you undertake.

So you admit to being too stupid and lazy to use a killfile.

Killfile? That has nothing to do with my response to your deeds. Using
a killfile is like putting blinders on a horse. Whatever is happening
around the horse is still happening.

You should never doubt me. For your every unpleasant action, there'll
be an unpleasant (for you) reaction.
Oh, your payback has just begun, stalker.
Remember, an unpleasant (for you) reaction.
You keep that in mind, too, stalker.
I'm keeping it very much in mind. I'm calling your bluff, weasel.
You couldn't call anything, dumbass.
It looks as if I already did so.

Only to a dumbass like me.

Yep.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Bile wrote:
wrote:
Dave Bile wrote:
N0VFP wrote:
Dave Bile wrote:
wrote:
Dave Vile wrote:

"Accesiable by the public" is a
clause, not a sentence.
Still doesn't change the fact you are stalking Roger Wiseman, "velley"
boy.
The facts say otherwise, wedgie boy.
Going to another person's house and taking pictures of it for the
specific purpose of posting them isn't stalking? I'm afraid the law
would disagree.
Test it. Everything will be on the table--e-mail, newsgroup posts,
witnesses to a face-to-face encounter, telephone records--all of it.
Worried?
Do I sound worried?

Yep.

None of my responses indicate worry on my part.

I can almost see the sweat on your receding brow.

You continue to underestimate people.

You continue to post things you know nothing about.

Yet, you make the effort to go to somebody's house and
take pictures of it and post them. Looks like you are the stalker,
delusional boy.
It wasn't much of an effort at all. You did what you did. I told you
what I'd do in response. I did it. The stalker is getting his payback.
Apparently, you are the stalker. And you just admitted it.
What I meant, I said above.
You said you'd stalk him some more.
I said that whatever you do, you'll get back in spades.

So you intend to stalk Roger some more.
I intend to respond to any unpleasantry you undertake.

So you admit to being too stupid and lazy to use a killfile.

Killfile? That has nothing to do with my response to your deeds. Using
a killfile is like putting blinders on a horse. Whatever is happening
around the horse is still happening.

Oh, so you are too stupid and lazy to use one for posts you don't like
to read.


It looks as if I already did so.

Only to a dumbass like you.

Yep.

Indeed.

Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

Yep.

None of my responses indicate worry on my part.

I can almost see the sweat on your receding brow.

geting more anf more like steve

do you use Morse Code?

sucked off an_old_friend wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

Yep.

None of my responses indicate worry on my part.

I can almost see the sweat on your receding brow.

geting more anf more like steve

What's "anf?"

do you use Morse Code?

.... / - / ..-. / ..- / --..-- / .-. / . / - / .- / .-. / -.. / .-.-.-

On 20 Feb 2006 11:19:06 -0800, wrote:


sucked off an_old_friend wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

Yep.

None of my responses indicate worry on my part.

I can almost see the sweat on your receding brow.

geting more anf more like steve

What's "anf?"

firgue it out
or not as you choose

do you use Morse Code?

... / - / ..-. / ..- / --..-- / .-. / . / - / .- / .-. / -.. / .-.-.-

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Bile wrote:
wrote:
Dave Bile wrote:
N0VFP wrote:
Dave Bile wrote:
wrote:
Dave Vile wrote:
"Accesiable by the public" is a
clause, not a sentence.
Still doesn't change the fact you are stalking Roger Wiseman, "velley"
boy.
The facts say otherwise, wedgie boy.
Going to another person's house and taking pictures of it for the
specific purpose of posting them isn't stalking? I'm afraid the law
would disagree.
Test it. Everything will be on the table--e-mail, newsgroup posts,
witnesses to a face-to-face encounter, telephone records--all of it.
Worried?
Do I sound worried?
Yep.
None of my responses indicate worry on my part.

I can almost see the sweat on your receding brow.

Then again, you have a rich, if disgusting fantasy life. You see people
having sex with the mothers, fathers, daughters and pets of others.

You continue to underestimate people.

You continue to post things you know nothing about.

You've already done much underestimating. That's why you've had the FCC
letters and retest. That's why your local police have visited. That's
why the photos of your house were posted.

Yet, you make the effort to go to somebody's house and
take pictures of it and post them. Looks like you are the stalker,
delusional boy.
It wasn't much of an effort at all. You did what you did. I told you
what I'd do in response. I did it. The stalker is getting his payback.
Apparently, you are the stalker. And you just admitted it.
What I meant, I said above.
You said you'd stalk him some more.
I said that whatever you do, you'll get back in spades.
So you intend to stalk Roger some more.
I intend to respond to any unpleasantry you undertake.
So you admit to being too stupid and lazy to use a killfile.
Killfile? That has nothing to do with my response to your deeds. Using
a killfile is like putting blinders on a horse. Whatever is happening
around the horse is still happening.

Oh, so you are too stupid and lazy to use one for posts you don't like
to read.

If I walk into a room with a floor covered in filth and I'm wearing a
blindfold, the floor is still covered in filth. The filth shouldn't be
there. In this case, you represent the filth.

Dave K8MN