assraped an old friend wrote:
wrote:
Then it doesn't apply in Wiseman's case, does it, dumbass?
indeed Mr Wismen does not apply to this NG

and yet you obesse indefending him and denieing that you are him

You are ****ing stupid, Markie. There are several of us "defending him"
you ****ing ignoramus.

On 6 Mar 2006 12:49:14 -0800, "N0VFP" wrote:


assraped an old friend wrote:
wrote:
Then it doesn't apply in Wiseman's case, does it, dumbass?
indeed Mr Wismen does not apply to this NG

and yet you obesse indefending him and denieing that you are him

You are ****ing stupid, Markie. There are several of us "defending him"
you ****ing ignoramus.
that does n't seem to be the case that is to say you are lying
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On 6 Mar 2006 12:49:14 -0800, "N0VFP" wrote:


assraped an old friend wrote:
wrote:
Then it doesn't apply in Wiseman's case, does it, dumbass?
indeed Mr Wismen does not apply to this NG

and yet you obesse indefending him and denieing that you are him

You are ****ing stupid, Markie. There are several of us "defending him"
you ****ing ignoramus.
that does n't seem to be the case that is to say you are lying

Wrong as usual, ****nuts.

Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
wrote:
On 6 Mar 2006 12:49:14 -0800, "N0VFP" wrote:

You are ****ing stupid, Markie. There are several of us "defending him"
you ****ing ignoramus.
that does n't seem to be the case that is to say you are lying

Wrong as usual, ****nuts.
an unproven asretion

sodomized an_old_friend wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
wrote:
On 6 Mar 2006 12:49:14 -0800, "N0VFP" wrote:

You are ****ing stupid, Markie. There are several of us "defending him"
you ****ing ignoramus.
that does n't seem to be the case that is to say you are lying

Wrong as usual, ****nuts.
an unproven asretion

Wrong, stupid. And learn to spell.

more if theft more sexaul obesion

More Markie stupidity.

On 7 Mar 2006 05:54:11 -0800, wrote:


sodomized an_old_friend wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
wrote:
On 6 Mar 2006 12:49:14 -0800, "N0VFP" wrote:

You are ****ing stupid, Markie. There are several of us "defending him"
you ****ing ignoramus.
that does n't seem to be the case that is to say you are lying

Wrong as usual, ****nuts.
an unproven asretion

rong, stupid. And learn to spell.
right it is an unproven assertion


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

"Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in message
ups.com...
wrote:
On 6 Mar 2006 12:49:14 -0800, "N0VFP" wrote:


assraped an old friend wrote:
wrote:
Then it doesn't apply in Wiseman's case, does it, dumbass?
indeed Mr Wismen does not apply to this NG

and yet you obesse indefending him and denieing that you are him

You are ****ing stupid, Markie. There are several of us "defending him"
you ****ing ignoramus.
that does n't seem to be the case that is to say you are lying

Wrong as usual, ****nuts

Still working as a garbageman, Wussman? Or did you move up to Burger King
fame? Besides, how is that so called college degree you received helping
you?

"N0VFP" wrote in message
oups.com...

assraped an old friend wrote:
wrote:
Then it doesn't apply in Wiseman's case, does it, dumbass?
indeed Mr Wismen does not apply to this NG

and yet you obesse indefending him and denieing that you are him

You are ****ing stupid, Markie. There are several of us "defending him"
you ****ing ignoramus.

Still writing in the 3rd person, eh Woger? Still living that delusional life
where you post your crap under 3 or 4 different aliases.