Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Although well written Mr Plod and in some places downright excellent I
think you are making assumptions about what AR "really is" and imprinting your own views as being the gospel. Mind you there is nothing wrong with that and invites positive discussion. Things could also be very different in G land but my experiences are different. Just be careful presenting this to outsiders as being something other than your personal view. You seem to dwell on the "difference" or "better than" that AR has over other radio services. Since this and the associated CB bashing that pervades this NG on a regular basis I guess you are in good company. You could roughly divide radio use into "CB related" "Amateur related" and anything else like public services and commercial. You then concentrate yet again on the CB vs AR debate. In my view there has always been a blurring about what use CB vs AR is about. It's a double set of bell shape curves that overlap in a lot of ways. The first thing you have to do when judging behaviour and use is to throw away the ideal world of what the law that was passed on the topic actually menas or is interpreted to mean. Such arguments as "go get your license and we'll let you experiment" are irrelevent in the light of what ACTUALLY happens in the real world. The law is suppose to reflect the community attitude and beliefs rather than force its direction. There will never be enough resources to enforce a law if a large percentage of those that affect it, ignore it! Yes there are undesirable people on both CB and AR bands. This however is a subset of people generally. You can be obnoxious just as easily without a radio as having one. What grade of license you have is irrelevent and it continues to happen. There is a lot of social conversion on AR, husbands and wives use it as a contact medium, people exchange weather reports and QSL cards. Those that go on desert treks use it as a backup emergency system. There is a lot on inane chatter about all types of things simply to hear one self speak! Are these within the technical pursuit of the hobby? CB'ers experiment with antenna systems and propagation, do technically illegal things to their radios in the PURSUIT of making them work better. In the process they learn and enjoy their hobby like an AR user does. Yes the technical standard isnt likely to be as high but it is there. There is NO brick wall seperating the use of the respective services. It is very blurred and overlaps considerably. There is no black or white view amongst most of those that use it. There are of course exceptions that dont look at the real world and try to force their own misguided views as correct. There is however a continual case of "I am better than you because I am licensed" not unlike the "keeping up with the Jones's" habit of preening in ones own nest. Unhappily though "decency" or whatever you like to call it is not just a function of radio users. Its the result of the way the world is changing or if you like a sociological problem just waiting to explode. The place is a lot unhappier, people are more willing to return to their animal instincts and anything that makes it easy to tread in your neighbours is fair game. I mean just look at this newsgroup... Apologies for this post being OT in the other groups posted Bob VK2YQA (Who is more intersted in technical pursuits) Plod's Conscience wrote: What is Ham Radio? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
197 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (23-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Policy | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
209 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (04-APR-04) | Shortwave |