|
yet another thread hijacked by steve in his campaign of violeting Google rules
On 20 Mar 2006 15:45:07 -0800, wrote:
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: cheated an old friend wrote: yet another Mark, try to understand, "MARS IS Amateur Radio!" and "Amateur Radio ISNT Public Safety!" and another on-topic thread IS ruined. yep _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
steve hijacks thread again
On 21 Mar 2006 05:01:25 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: an_old_fiend wrote: K4YZ wrote: cheated an old friend wrote: yet another Mark, try to understand, "MARS IS Amateur Radio!" and "Amateur Radio ISNT Public Safety!" and another on-topic thread IS ruined. If it's "ruined", it was ruined by Markie making 6 or 7 spin off threads just to try and dilute his red-hatted-monkey dance. you retasked the thread to markie or morkie mularkie that ruined the thread you hijack every thread to an attack on me Todd BB frank or Len that seem to be you sole prupose in life at least on RRAP No YOU chime in with nothing to offer either even though I know it was you who put the first non-event report up. nothing but the truth something you are never even with9in DX radio contact with it seem Business as usual... indeed for you it is tell me answer this with cogent answer and I drop the flame war why are you on RRAO at all? what is your purpose? Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
More Markie Mularkie
|
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
, N0IMD, Brian P Burke wrote: wrote: On 20 Mar 2006 15:34:35 -0800, wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: wrote: From: The ARRL Letter Vol. 25, No. 11 nice to have somethng to discuss OTOH WE are NOT seen as a public saety function. I wonder how hard the ARRL worked to get us classified with PS&HSB? did they work toward that gol at all? you are still a memebr you might ask? The first I heard of it was their announcement that we aren't being reclassified. That tells me that they were working on it. No...it means someone may have THOUGHT about it...At best the article appears to simply say that it's not on the table for whatever reasons and that it's not on anyone's agenda to do otherwise. HMMMM not good for the safety of ARS freqs id say Perhaps. sorry you areit isn't "preahps it is "not Good" it may also be not bad but surely being classiefied with EMS and therefore above taxi cabs would have been good for us in the long run both here and in our neighboor Canada where vhf bandwidth is also at rsik Had we been reclassed, there might be actual demands that the ARS would have to live up to other than "goodwill.". More assinine, unfounded BS from Brain P Burke. There's not ONE bit of media release about Amatuer Radio as it pertains to the most recent disaster response in Louisiana that is anything BUT positive vis-a-vis Amateur Radio. WHERE do you come up with these assinine assertions, Burke? Two years ago you started in on this line about how ARES/RACES/MARS would not be able to respond or sustain a disaster relief communications, yet there's been one significant disaster after another, none the least of which being Katrina, and in every case where those agencies responded there's been nothing but positive press...And I am NOT talking about ARRL stuff...Real, mainstream media...CNN, Fox, MSNBC, etc. The Amateur Radio Serivce, under the banners of MARS, ARES, RACES, etc, has more than lived up to it's claims of disaster communications support, yet you continue to make a fool out of yourself claiming otherwise. Burke, WHY do you continue this silly behaviour when you've been proven wrong over and over and over...?!?! Idiot. Steve, K4YZ |
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
wrote: wrote: On 20 Mar 2006 15:34:35 -0800, wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: From: The ARRL Letter Vol. 25, No. 11 nice to have somethng to discuss OTOH WE are NOT seen as a public saety function. I wonder how hard the ARRL worked to get us classified with PS&HSB? did they work toward that gol at all? you are still a memebr you might ask? The first I heard of it was their announcement that we aren't being reclassified. That tells me that they were working on it. likely i agree HMMMM not good for the safety of ARS freqs id say Perhaps. sorry you areit isn't "preahps it is "not Good" it may also be not bad but surely being classiefied with EMS and therefore above taxi cabs would have been good for us in the long run both here and in our neighboor Canada where vhf bandwidth is also at rsik Had we been reclassed, there might be actual demands that the ARS would have to live up to other than "goodwill.". and we do just do it in an disorganized keystone copish way I'm just dumbfounded why we're wasting spectrum on high-definition TV? yep but that is money and if the money for it comes to the FCC at al it might do some good by acident Somebody will make some money. Anyone who wanted better TV has cable or dish. yep |
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
an old friend wrote: wrote: wrote: On 20 Mar 2006 15:34:35 -0800, wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: From: The ARRL Letter Vol. 25, No. 11 nice to have somethng to discuss OTOH WE are NOT seen as a public saety function. I wonder how hard the ARRL worked to get us classified with PS&HSB? did they work toward that gol at all? you are still a memebr you might ask? The first I heard of it was their announcement that we aren't being reclassified. That tells me that they were working on it. likely i agree HMMMM not good for the safety of ARS freqs id say Perhaps. sorry you areit isn't "preahps it is "not Good" it may also be not bad but surely being classiefied with EMS and therefore above taxi cabs would have been good for us in the long run both here and in our neighboor Canada where vhf bandwidth is also at rsik Had we been reclassed, there might be actual demands that the ARS would have to live up to other than "goodwill.". and we do just do it in an disorganized keystone copish way Sometimes, maybe. I'm sure there are times when the ARS support is superb. But that is as "volunteers." Things are a lot different when your volunteer status changes to responsibilities you have taskings. |
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: wrote: On 20 Mar 2006 15:34:35 -0800, wrote: sorry you areit isn't "preahps it is "not Good" it may also be not bad but surely being classiefied with EMS and therefore above taxi cabs would have been good for us in the long run both here and in our neighboor Canada where vhf bandwidth is also at rsik Had we been reclassed, there might be actual demands that the ARS would have to live up to other than "goodwill.". and we do just do it in an disorganized keystone copish way Sometimes, maybe. I'm sure there are times when the ARS support is superb. indeed esp in smaller dsasters But that is as "volunteers." Things are a lot different when your volunteer status changes to responsibilities you have taskings. indeed but we could have been classed as voloteers under public safety it would helpful to reconized above taxi drivers |
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
an old freind wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: wrote: On 20 Mar 2006 15:34:35 -0800, wrote: sorry you areit isn't "preahps it is "not Good" it may also be not bad but surely being classiefied with EMS and therefore above taxi cabs would have been good for us in the long run both here and in our neighboor Canada where vhf bandwidth is also at rsik Had we been reclassed, there might be actual demands that the ARS would have to live up to other than "goodwill.". and we do just do it in an disorganized keystone copish way Sometimes, maybe. I'm sure there are times when the ARS support is superb. indeed esp in smaller dsasters But that is as "volunteers." Things are a lot different when your volunteer status changes to responsibilities you have taskings. indeed but we could have been classed as voloteers under public safety it would helpful to reconized above taxi drivers And that's just it. The chest-thumpers got snubbed by this announcement. |
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
wrote: an old freind wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: But that is as "volunteers." Things are a lot different when your volunteer status changes to responsibilities you have taskings. indeed but we could have been classed as voloteers under public safety it would helpful to reconized above taxi drivers And that's just it. The chest-thumpers got snubbed by this announcement. Yes I see your point, sadly it is a valid one pity it will surely fly over there head at rf speeds |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com