Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: ToS violation steve wrote: and another Tos violation From: The ARRL Letter Vol. 25, No. 11 March 17, 2006 following the FCC open meeting. "The plan is to keep those in the Wireless Bureau." nice to have somethng to discuss Discuss WHAT? A NON event? OTOH WE are NOT seen as a public saety function. HMMMM not good for the safety of ARS freqs id say This will have nothing to do with the "safety of ARS freqs", Mork. another ToS violation steve if we were being classed as public safety I am sure it improve our hold on those freqs Getting folks to rally and finally push through ONE of the "spectrum protection act" bills that has been in front of Congress over the last 20 years WOULD, however no one seems to want to REALLY "do" anything to make those happen. Steve, K4YZ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() cheated an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: ToS violation steve Where? wrote: and another Tos violation Where? From: The ARRL Letter Vol. 25, No. 11 March 17, 2006 following the FCC open meeting. "The plan is to keep those in the Wireless Bureau." nice to have somethng to discuss Discuss WHAT? A NON event? OTOH WE are NOT seen as a public saety function. HMMMM not good for the safety of ARS freqs id say This will have nothing to do with the "safety of ARS freqs", Mork. another ToS violation steve Where? if we were being classed as public safety I am sure it improve our hold on those freqs No we won't. TRY and understand the difference between "public safety" and "Amateur Radio", Mork. Steve, K4YZ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: cheated an old friend wrote: yet another |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|