| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
March 22nd 06, 11:15 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: wrote: On 20 Mar 2006 15:34:35 -0800, wrote: sorry you areit isn't "preahps it is "not Good" it may also be not bad but surely being classiefied with EMS and therefore above taxi cabs would have been good for us in the long run both here and in our neighboor Canada where vhf bandwidth is also at rsik Had we been reclassed, there might be actual demands that the ARS would have to live up to other than "goodwill.". and we do just do it in an disorganized keystone copish way Sometimes, maybe. I'm sure there are times when the ARS support is superb. indeed esp in smaller dsasters But that is as "volunteers." Things are a lot different when your volunteer status changes to responsibilities you have taskings. indeed but we could have been classed as voloteers under public safety it would helpful to reconized above taxi drivers |
|
#3
March 23rd 06, 12:59 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
an old freind wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: wrote: On 20 Mar 2006 15:34:35 -0800, wrote: sorry you areit isn't "preahps it is "not Good" it may also be not bad but surely being classiefied with EMS and therefore above taxi cabs would have been good for us in the long run both here and in our neighboor Canada where vhf bandwidth is also at rsik Had we been reclassed, there might be actual demands that the ARS would have to live up to other than "goodwill.". and we do just do it in an disorganized keystone copish way Sometimes, maybe. I'm sure there are times when the ARS support is superb. indeed esp in smaller dsasters But that is as "volunteers." Things are a lot different when your volunteer status changes to responsibilities you have taskings. indeed but we could have been classed as voloteers under public safety it would helpful to reconized above taxi drivers And that's just it. The chest-thumpers got snubbed by this announcement. |
|
#4
March 23rd 06, 01:02 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
wrote: an old freind wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: But that is as "volunteers." Things are a lot different when your volunteer status changes to responsibilities you have taskings. indeed but we could have been classed as voloteers under public safety it would helpful to reconized above taxi drivers And that's just it. The chest-thumpers got snubbed by this announcement. Yes I see your point, sadly it is a valid one pity it will surely fly over there head at rf speeds |
|
#5
March 23rd 06, 10:46 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
an Old friend wrote (Tweedle Dumb): wrote (Tweedle Dumber): an old freind wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: But that is as "volunteers." Things are a lot different when your volunteer status changes to responsibilities you have taskings. indeed but we could have been classed as voloteers under public safety it would helpful to reconized above taxi drivers And that's just it. The chest-thumpers got snubbed by this announcement. Such as who? Yes I see your point, sadly it is a valid one What point? That he's making even MORE unfounded, baseless suggestions of poor performance of ARES? Because that's ALL Miss Burke is doing. Miss Burke's "condition" here is clear. He's been making these "ARES can't do it" suggestions for 2 years now despite the onslaught of data to the contrary. Furthermore, when tasked to back up some of his allegations with SOME example or evidence, all he can do is disappear for a while and hope no one remembers what a fool he made of himself LAST time. (That seems to be an inherent trait for Feeble Fivers...Morkie, take notice...)) pity it will surely fly over there head at rf speeds Mutt and Jeff patting each other on the back. How comical. Steve, K4YZ |
|
#6
March 23rd 06, 04:31 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
K4YZ wrote: an Old friend wrote (Tweedle Dumb): moe f your hijacking effort wrote (Tweedle Dumber): still more an old freind wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: But that is as "volunteers." Things are a lot different when your volunteer status changes to responsibilities you have taskings. indeed but we could have been classed as voloteers under public safety it would helpful to reconized above taxi drivers And that's just it. The chest-thumpers got snubbed by this announcement. Such as who? you for one since you want to make it personal but mostly it seems the ARRL itself Yes I see your point, sadly it is a valid one What point? the point That he's making even MORE unfounded, baseless suggestions of poor performance of ARES? Because that's ALL Miss Burke is doing. again you you enage in sexauly based attack rather than deal with the issue pity it will surely fly over there head at rf speeds Mutt and Jeff patting each other on the back. proving that you were right BB ty steve I knew we could count on you for the proof in this case How comical. Steve, K4YZ |
|
#7
March 23rd 06, 05:10 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
wrote: an old freind wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: \ it would helpful to reconized above taxi drivers And that's just it. The chest-thumpers got snubbed by this announcement. yep and steve choose to prove your points in spades he thinks we are better (safety of frequency wise) on the same leel as NYC taxi drivers sad his attitude make me suspect what I don't want to believe that the FCC is right are no more impartant that than Taxis drivers of NYC in a disater the FCC could hardly have showed it comptemtpt for usmore lcearly |
|
#8
March 24th 06, 12:48 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
an_old_friend wrote: wrote: an old freind wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: \ it would helpful to reconized above taxi drivers And that's just it. The chest-thumpers got snubbed by this announcement. yep and steve choose to prove your points in spades I'm sure it was completely unintentional. he thinks we are better (safety of frequency wise) on the same level as NYC taxi drivers sad his attitude make me suspect what I don't want to believe that the FCC is right are no more impartant that than Taxis drivers of NYC in a disater the FCC could hardly have showed it comptemtpt for usmore lcearly The FCC has spoken. That it does not sit well with the chest thumpers is not my problem. |
|
#9
March 24th 06, 02:10 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: an old freind wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: \ it would helpful to reconized above taxi drivers And that's just it. The chest-thumpers got snubbed by this announcement. yep and steve choose to prove your points in spades I'm sure it was completely unintentional. but it was entirely predicatble he thinks we are better (safety of frequency wise) on the same level as NYC taxi drivers sad his attitude make me suspect what I don't want to believe that the FCC is right are no more impartant that than Taxis drivers of NYC in a disater the FCC could hardly have showed it comptemtpt for usmore lcearly The FCC has spoken. That it does not sit well with the chest thumpers is not my problem. sure has like I said does not bode well for in the spectrum wars |
|
#10
March 25th 06, 03:20 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
an_old_friend wrote: wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: an old freind wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: \ it would helpful to reconized above taxi drivers And that's just it. The chest-thumpers got snubbed by this announcement. yep and steve choose to prove your points in spades I'm sure it was completely unintentional. but it was entirely predicatble he thinks we are better (safety of frequency wise) on the same level as NYC taxi drivers sad his attitude make me suspect what I don't want to believe that the FCC is right are no more impartant that than Taxis drivers of NYC in a disater the FCC could hardly have showed it comptemtpt for usmore lcearly The FCC has spoken. That it does not sit well with the chest thumpers is not my problem. sure has like I said does not bode well for in the spectrum wars Welp, some didn't have a clue what our standing with the FCC actually was. |
Hybrid Mode
