Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Big Red Ham wrote: why are you losers so interested in whats wwm's shack? becuase they lack anything of substance what ever it is or ISN'T is none of your business."IF" he has tx equptment for 11 mtr you can't proved he transmitted with it. indeed nothing ilegal in a ham having equipment able to tranmit outside the ham bands I have some myself used to drive tranverters or the fact I own gear able to tranmit on on 220-222 Mhz(an older moble for the band Thats the point. he's a HAM! HE CAM HAVE IT! he's free to enhance the radio art. How in the hell do you "know" what freq that radio CAN transmit on? One thing for sure, if wwm worked on it it's by the book! let alone what frequencies of what it is able to to tranmit on that it has tranmitted instead of tearing this ham apart, why not try to work him on six? oh right, being decent to wwm might invoke the "amateur code of conduct"...............sure couldnt have that! That code was on life suport when I was first licensed in 1997 in most seems long dead by now |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
THE AMERICAN RADIO RELAY LEAGUE NEEDS TO BE FINED | Policy | |||
FCC SHUTS DOWN the 'Boy Broadcaster" from ME | General | |||
Permanent ISS Amateur Radio Station, Human Crews Share Fourth Anniversary | Shortwave | |||
RILEY SAYS K1MAN BROADCASTS ARE LEGAL | Shortwave | |||
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 | General |