Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-05-25, Slow Code wrote:
to be a ham now days, so licensing requirements have to be low in order to help keep our numbers up. They won't work for a license. I don't think that's entirely true. I'm working for my license. Learning code, radio and antenna theory, SMT, and every other thing I can think of. Got an ARRL Handbook ('91), a cheapo hand key, and a G. West test book. Do I think code should be required? Yes. IMO, knowing what I'm doing is what being a ham is all about. Knowing code is part of that. In fact, with the possible spread of BPL, CW may again become the only way to punch through. If I just wanted to press a button and yap, I'd buy a CB or a cellphone. nb |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
AMATEUR RADIO VOLUNTEERS FILLING COMMUNICATION GAPS IN GULF REGIONfrom today's ARRL Letter | Policy | |||
Open Letter to K1MAN | Policy | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #697 | General | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL's Incoming QSL Burro Screwing NON ARRL members! | Policy |