Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 12th 06, 03:33 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 997
Default Why does slow code hate the ARS I asuume it is becuase one of his other names is hey stupid

On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:03:09 -0500, "CW"
wrote:

with all due respect to you as a fellow ham I strongly disagree with your
position. I got my ticket the so called "right" way. I've held an advanced
(WA4***) class since I had to drive to the nearest office for for the
written and cw.
Remember when the dam questions weren't even allowed to be published?
Remember those stupid ass ARRL study manuals?Al,how was that better?


Better? I don't know. Who said it was?

But how many hams today could even understand a schematic, let alone
build a W2EWL rig? But how many SSB (or DSB) transmitters were
homebrew? Hams don't even build repeater controllers any longer -
everything is appliance. What's ham radio supposed to be (from the
government viewpoint) if not a training ground? For people who know
how to operate. Not for CBers on ham bands.

People are afraid of losing things if we have too few hams? Where
will the FCC's justification go (the "ham radio provides us with a
pool of experienced operators" thing) if ham radio is just CB on
different frequencies?
  #2   Report Post  
Old July 12th 06, 03:40 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default Why does slow code hate the ARS I asuume it is becuase one of his other names is hey stupid


Al Klein wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:03:09 -0500, "CW"
wrote:

with all due respect to you as a fellow ham I strongly disagree with your
position. I got my ticket the so called "right" way. I've held an advanced
(WA4***) class since I had to drive to the nearest office for for the
written and cw.
Remember when the dam questions weren't even allowed to be published?
Remember those stupid ass ARRL study manuals?Al,how was that better?


Better? I don't know. Who said it was?

you did

But how many hams today could even understand a schematic, let alone
build a W2EWL rig?

how many need to
But how many SSB (or DSB) transmitters were
homebrew?

I have a hombrew AM unit a cute little thing built from the plan in th
last issue of CQ VHF's first run I will call it
Hams don't even build repeater controllers any longer -
everything is appliance.

so?
What's ham radio supposed to be (from the
government viewpoint) if not a training ground?

and it is
For people who know
how to operate. Not for CBers on ham bands.

People are afraid of losing things if we have too few hams?

indeed they are
Where
will the FCC's justification go (the "ham radio provides us with a
pool of experienced operators" thing) if ham radio is just CB on
different frequencies?

how is thatever going to happen?
why are you so afraid of CB?

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A question for nickle Generals and Extras. Would you renew your license? Slow Code Equipment 46 July 12th 06 04:03 AM
Another License Idea [email protected] Policy 37 January 3rd 06 03:43 AM
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? Bill Sohl Policy 254 December 31st 05 03:50 AM
Why You Don't Like The ARRL Louis C. LeVine Policy 803 January 23rd 04 01:12 AM
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) N2EY Policy 0 November 30th 03 01:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017