an old friend continued his assault on the newsgroup with:
K4YZ wrote:
an old freind wastes bandwidth with:
K4YZ wrote:
an old friend continues his pattern of self-abuse:

more libel and fraud

Where?

bring on your "lawsuit"

What lawsuit, Morkie?

the one you promised to file on Dec 29 2005

and repeted you intent to do so last week

Nope.

you can't win

If I chose to being one, I certainly would.

but you can't win one so don't file

Sure I could.

You keep acting like an idiot in a public forum, so there's more
than enough evidence to support my contentions.

You provide more than enough material for one.

nope

Your denial doens't make it untrue, Mork.

all I did is take you at your word when you said it was all right to
point out you are the father of defective child

What defective child?

your defective chilld the one you claim died remember her?

I didn't have a "defective chiild", Morkie.

and you are

yea it is creul statement

What's "creul", Morkie...?!?!

but compared to his months of calling me a child molesto r it is mild
by comaprison

You BELONG in a "comaprison", Morkie.

why?

Because.

You act like you're in a coma.

people in coma'sdo not post to the internet

therefore you lied again

But you do...so how do you explain that, fatboy?

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an old friend continued his assault on the newsgroup with:
more lies from the maj
What lawsuit, Morkie?

the one you promised to file on Dec 29 2005

and repeted you intent to do so last week

Nope.
yep

you promised it

you lied

you can't win

If I chose to being one, I certainly would.

but you can't win one so don't file

Sure I could.
then bring it on

till you do it is another of your lies


You keep acting like an idiot in a public forum, so there's more
than enough evidence to support my contentions.
nope

you can't support the only important one the contention you are harmed
by actions not your own

You provide more than enough material for one.

nope

Your denial doens't make it untrue, Mork.
agreed it being unture does however

all I did is take you at your word when you said it was all right to
point out you are the father of defective child

What defective child?

your defective chilld the one you claim died remember her?

I didn't have a "defective chiild", Morkie.
sure you did or you lied


You act like you're in a coma.

people in coma'sdo not post to the internet

therefore you lied again

But you do...so how do you explain that, fatboy?
I have

with the accurate statement that you are lying when you claim i post
like I am in a coma

Steve, K4YZ

an old friend cut a fool again:
K4YZ wrote:
an old friend continued his assault on the newsgroup with:

more lies from the maj

What "maj"...?!?!

What lawsuit, Morkie?

the one you promised to file on Dec 29 2005

and repeted you intent to do so last week

Nope.

yep

Nope.

you promised it

"Promised"...?!?!

you lied

Nope...YOU did.

you can't win

If I chose to being one, I certainly would.

but you can't win one so don't file

Sure I could.

then bring it on

Bring what on?

till you do it is another of your lies

What lies?

You keep acting like an idiot in a public forum, so there's more
than enough evidence to support my contentions.

nope

Yep.

Your very reply to this post is evidence of it.

you can't support the only important one the contention you are harmed
by actions not your own

Huh?

You provide more than enough material for one.

nope

Your denial doens't make it untrue, Mork.

agreed it being unture does however

Yet another trashing of the English language.

Try again, fatboy.

all I did is take you at your word when you said it was all right to
point out you are the father of defective child

What defective child?

your defective chilld the one you claim died remember her?

I didn't have a "defective chiild", Morkie.

sure you did or you lied

No, I didn't.

You act like you're in a coma.

people in coma'sdo not post to the internet

therefore you lied again

But you do...so how do you explain that, fatboy?

I have

No...You haven't.

with the accurate statement that you are lying when you claim i post
like I am in a coma

Where?

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an old friend cut a fool again:
K4YZ wrote:
an old friend continued his assault on the newsgroup with:

more lies from the maj

you lied

Nope...YOU did.
nope

you can't win

If I chose to being one, I certainly would.

but you can't win one so don't file

Sure I could.

then bring it on

Bring what on?
your lawsuit

till you do it is another of your lies

What lies?
all of them

You keep acting like an idiot in a public forum, so there's more
than enough evidence to support my contentions.

nope

Yep.

Your very reply to this post is evidence of it.
but not evidence of anything that you can sue me for

you can't support the only important one the contention you are harmed
by actions not your own

Huh?
you have to prove in court the contention you have been harmed by me,
and not a result of your own action
you can't prove that you have no lawsuit

an old friend wrote:

you can't prove that you have no lawsuit

BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WHAT AN IDIOT!


Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:

you cut this line of course
you have to prove in court the contention you have been harmed by me,
and not a result of your own action

you can't prove that you have no lawsuit
and it is true
if you can't prove that "you have to prove in court the contention you
have been harmed by me,
and not a result of your own action " you have no lawsuit

cuting the whining
Steve, K4YZ

an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:

you cut this line of course

It wasn't necessary, fatboy!

You humiliated yourself yet again!

you have to prove in court the contention you have been harmed by me,
and not a result of your own action

And that has NO bearing on your stupid abuse of the King's
English.

you can't prove that you have no lawsuit

and it is true

And yet again you make a fool out of yourself with the SAME
COMMENT!

See, Morkie...I am RIGHT AGAIN about your preference for being
publically humiliated!

if you can't prove that "you have to prove in court the contention you
have been harmed by me,
and not a result of your own action " you have no lawsuit

cuting the whining

What whining, Morkie...?!?!

You mean the ribald laughter...?!?!

Well, here it is again! You certainly are keeping me laughing
today!

BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!

You can "ctu" it all you want to, fatboy, but the fact remains
that "...I am laughing at the "superior intellect"..."

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:

you cut this line of course

It wasn't necessary, fatboy!
yes it was

and more libel

You humiliated yourself yet again!
more wishfull thinking

you have to prove in court the contention you have been harmed by me,
and not a result of your own action

And that has NO bearing on your stupid abuse of the King's
English.
no abuse occored

you can't prove that you have no lawsuit

and it is true

And yet again you make a fool out of yourself with the SAME
COMMENT!
and you are still avoiding the facts


See, Morkie...I am RIGHT AGAIN about your preference for being
publically humiliated!
more wishfull thinking maj

the world is not so concerned as you with period and commas


if you can't prove that "you have to prove in court the contention you
have been harmed by me,
and not a result of your own action " you have no lawsuit

cuting the whining

What whining, Morkie...?!?!
your whiing

You mean the ribald laughter...?!?!
whatever

Well, here it is again! You certainly are keeping me laughing
today!
more proove you enjoy your harrasment steve

You can "ctu" it all you want to, fatboy, but the fact remains
that "...I am laughing at the "superior intellect"..."
yes indeed you are laughing at the superior intelect

as well as the better man

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an old freid to some a nightmare to steve wrote some really assinine
stuff:


you have to prove in court the contention you have been harmed by me,
and not a result of your own action

And that has NO bearing on your stupid abuse of the King's
English.

no abuse occored

"no abuse occored"...
for asuse toto the Kings english to occour it must exist

as it happens the English belong to the queen
you can't prove that you have no lawsuit

and it is true

And yet again you make a fool out of yourself with the SAME
COMMENT!

and you are still avoiding the facts

What "facts"...?!?!

The FACTS are that you made yet another idiotic statement in public
directly due to your incompetence in your English skills!
nope the facts are you have been caught in lie and will do or say
anything to avoid the truth

the world is not so concerned as you with period and commas

It's concerned if you don't want to look like an idiot!
not realy most of the wolrd hadly cares



You mean the ribald laughter...?!?!

whatever

I see you snipped text without announcing the editing.

Some call that cheating.
ut not you since you do it all the time

Well, here it is again! You certainly are keeping me laughing
today!

more proove you enjoy your harrasment steve

Nope.
yep
You can "ctu" it all you want to, fatboy, but the fact remains
that "...I am laughing at the "superior intellect"..."

yes indeed you are laughing at the superior intelect

as well as the better man

I am "laughing" at neither, as noted by the "quotation marks"
around the original comments.
yes indeed you are wether you know or not is not an issue I am
concerned with


Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an old freid to some a nightmare to parents with children wrote:
more libel
K4YZ wrote:


The FACTS are that you made yet another idiotic statement in public
directly due to your incompetence in your English skills!

nope the facts are you have been caught in lie and will do or say
anything to avoid the truth

No lie has been stated by me, nor have I been caught in one.
sure you have
one is your statement that my wife is male



You can "ctu" it all you want to, fatboy, but the fact remains
that "...I am laughing at the "superior intellect"..."

yes indeed you are laughing at the superior intelect

as well as the better man

I am "laughing" at neither, as noted by the "quotation marks"
around the original comments.

yes indeed you are wether you know or not is not an issue I am
concerned with

That ANYone over 6 is a better "man" than you is not in contest.
more libel more cheap insults

Steve, K4YZ