RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/98632-if-you-had-use-cw-save-someones-life-would-person-die.html)

Cecil Moore July 15th 06 02:58 AM

If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that persondie?
 
Al Klein wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:

Al Klein wrote:
Transmitters that use GPS-derived data aren't GPS-based systems, ...


Huh???? Can you prove that assertion? :-)


The notification systems are radio-based.


Your assertion that transmitting GPS coordinates is not
a GPS-based system is obviously ridiculous and hopefully
just a bad joke. Better luck next time.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

[email protected] July 15th 06 03:15 AM

If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
 

Dirk wrote:
Ham's care more about operating appliances than knowing how to save a lives.

:-(


Many ham are American Red Cross first aid and adult CPR instructors.

That trumps CW at any speed.


[email protected] July 15th 06 03:17 AM

If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
 

Steve N. wrote:
Uh oh! Now a battle of the troll-o-meters...
Really cute, Bill...I love it.

73, Steve, K9DCI
P.S. I tilted my monitor and I see that this movement is a little out of
balance on the sides. End-to-end balance is ok. Carefully turn the balance
weight on the right side in a little, then it'll sit on zero regardless of
the orientation...


Press the degauss button. The needle will let go.

"R. Scott" wrote in message
...
------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
TROLL-O-METER


Bill, W6WRT


There I fixed it for you




an old friend July 15th 06 03:40 AM

If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
 

wrote:
Dirk wrote:
Ham's care more about operating appliances than knowing how to save a lives.

:-(


Many ham are American Red Cross first aid and adult CPR instructors.

That trumps CW at any speed.

lol thank you for that


Al Klein July 15th 06 05:53 PM

If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
 
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 01:58:48 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Your assertion that transmitting GPS coordinates is not
a GPS-based system is obviously ridiculous and hopefully
just a bad joke. Better luck next time.


No GPS, the notification still occurs. No radio, the notice doesn't
occur. What was the notification based on, again?

Alun L. Palmer July 15th 06 08:04 PM

If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
 
wrote in
s.com:


Steve N. wrote:
Uh oh! Now a battle of the troll-o-meters...
Really cute, Bill...I love it.

73, Steve, K9DCI
P.S. I tilted my monitor and I see that this movement is a little out
of balance on the sides. End-to-end balance is ok. Carefully turn
the balance weight on the right side in a little, then it'll sit on
zero regardless of the orientation...


Press the degauss button. The needle will let go.

"R. Scott" wrote in message
...
------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
TROLL-O-METER


Bill, W6WRT

There I fixed it for you





Just found this thread. If I had to use CW to save someone's life, it would
depend on a lot of variables.

Firstly, if it involved any of my own ham radio gear, it would be more than
a little odd, since I have a mic for each transceiver and I don't own a key
jack that would plug into any of them, although I do have a straight key,
just no jack to plug it in with.

Assuming some weird contrived scenario where I had the equipment to send CW
but not phone, it would depend what frequencies it worked on. If it was on
the HF ham bands then no major problem, as there are still quite a few
people who still use CW.

My own lack of real aptitude shouldn't be a real problem for two reasons.
One, I could slow down to a comfortable speed, i.e. 5-10 wpm. Two, it would
matter more whether others could copy my sending than vicea versa. I did
pass 20 wpm, but have yet to buy a plug for my key, many years later. As I
said though, that really wouldn't make a difference.

If you asked the same question to someone who had only passed 5 wpm and
then, like me, never used it, then I suspect the victim wouldn't make it.
But then in most countries there is NO morse code testing any more, so
there are plenty of hams now who've never learnt atall. For decades there
have been no code VHF hams in most countries anyway.

There again, if the key was anything other than a straight key, that would
be curtains for the victim, as I would have no idea how to use it.

OTOH, if this scenario didn't involve the HF ham bands, then the victim
would be as good as dead, as I'd never find a non-ham who could still read
CW on the other end.

And your point was...?

Cecil Moore July 15th 06 08:48 PM

If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that persondie?
 
Al Klein wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
Your assertion that transmitting GPS coordinates is not
a GPS-based system is obviously ridiculous and hopefully
just a bad joke. Better luck next time.


No GPS, the notification still occurs. No radio, the notice doesn't
occur. What was the notification based on, again?


Any notification that reports GPS coordinates is GPS-based,
by definition. When you add GPS capability to a radio
transmitter, it doesn't cease to be radio-based but it also
becomes GPS-based. It's not an either/or mutual exclusive
situation. Just as one can have a vehicle that is both
white and a Chevrolet, one can have an emergency system
that is both GPS-based and radio-based.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

clfe July 15th 06 09:24 PM

If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
 
"Alun L. Palmer" wrote in message
. ..
wrote in
s.com:

If you asked the same question to someone who had only passed 5 wpm and
then, like me, never used it, then I suspect the victim wouldn't make it.
But then in most countries there is NO morse code testing any more, so
there are plenty of hams now who've never learnt atall. For decades there
have been no code VHF hams in most countries anyway.


To "some" extent, I "may" have to disagree. I held a class once for "No Code
Tech" and one of the guys - a man in his 70s asked if he could go for the
code test even though I wasn't teaching code. He said he had learned it
years ago in the service - but may be rusty. Let me tell you - when he was
done testing, he had PERFECT copy. Was he practicing all along? We'll never
know - nor did I ask. He has since passed on. Some people DO have a good
memory and retain quite well. Others - lose things almost immediately if not
used. Some of us, it takes a while to lose it and we usually do.

Lou



Slow Code July 16th 06 04:28 AM

If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
 
wrote in
oups.com:


Dirk wrote:
Ham's care more about operating appliances than knowing how to save a
lives.

:-(


Many ham are American Red Cross first aid and adult CPR instructors.

That trumps CW at any speed.




Have you ever givin CPR to a person 500 miles away? You must have long
arms.

Sc

Slow Code July 16th 06 04:28 AM

If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
 
"an old friend" wrote in
ups.com:


wrote:

Many ham are American Red Cross first aid and adult CPR instructors.

That trumps CW at any speed.

lol thank you for that


Sorry Mark, the pumping and blowing you know isn't called CPR.

SC






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com