Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#681
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
Who's gonna see a single want ad in 300 postings about nothing?
Who wants to pilfer 300 postings about nothing to find a sale ad? On the Somalia thing, Do you mean extremists/terrorists that claim to follow Islam, or just basic Islamists? It looks like you mean the former. Please understand that Al Qaeda is a group of terrorists/extremists, it doesn't matter what religion they claim to follow. rb wrote in message ups.com... Woody wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Woody wrote: Manual telegraphy? C'mon... You do realize I'm a disgruntled radio swap group, off-topic, post bombing loser, right? I'm just thinking this would be a great place for a radio swap group, that's all. Everything I say is usually in sarcasm.....just to add stupidity to the stupidty.... I've given up though and I'm going back to ebay... Alright. List your stuff. Maybe someone is interested. I've got a lot of respect for both. Served with the 2ID at Casey, and again with the marines and 10th mountain in somalia. Big Ol' Kudos to you bro. Somalians suck. I think there are indeed places that qualify as Fourth-world countries. Somalia, Nigeria, etc... LOL.. rb It sucked. Just got a message on the somalia reflector today. Seems the al qaida is well liked in somalia because the country has been through 15 years of chaos and lawlessness, and the islamists are now imposing their law. I guess any law is better than none. Reminds me, in part, how hitler came to power. |
#682
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
Woody wrote:
Since I don't know this Robitussin guy, I really can't say anything in reply to this post.... rb All you have to do (if you've got about 8 hours to spare) is go through Google archives since before they bought it from DejaNews several years ago. "Robitussin" has thousands of postings in the same venal manner he continues to use... especially his self-promotion as heroic USMC veteran which he has never, ever proved through any third-party references, digitized documents, or much of anything else other than his own AOL home page and self-description on QRZ. He is clearly into his own fantasy of imagined superpowers without the aid of Stan Lee. :-) |
#683
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
Woody wrote:
So you guys got sidetracked and missed the CW call so both your guys died. You are the weakest link. Goodbye. rb wrote in message oups.com... rom: on Thurs, Aug 24 2006 6:39 pm "Sidetracked?!?" :-) I put this message into the Captain ARRL Superpower Decryption machine and the machine broke down. Last I looked (which was yesterday) there were NO Public Safety radio services which used "CW" for either "life-saving" or distress calls. The USCG doesn't monitor the OLD 500 KHz international maritime distress and safety frequency any more. International Civil Aviation Organization long ago stopped any need for carrying "CW"-proficient air crew on over-ocean flights. This "vital need" of maintaining a "pool of trained (morsemen) operators" in the mighty amateur radio (militia?) ranks is a wigment of olde-tyme morsemen's imagination. In truth, I haven't checked out the Civil Air Patrol. Maybe they have some kind of "need" for morsemen even though they use 121.5 MHz for emergencies just like all the CIVIL airways do. [transponder squawk to 77 or 7700 if that is installed; 243 MHz if a REAL military aircraft] We'll have to see what the "pilot in command" of a TN CAP two-seater has to say on that...if he isn't "busy" with his "life-saving air patrols." :-) |
#684
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that persondie?
George Orwell wrote:
Al Klein said: Eliminating a requirement is dumbing things down. But no one would expect you to be able to understand that. Well, let me ask, from the point of view of a potential noob to the hobby. What use is the code requirements? The 'use' is something you just can't understand. The 'use' is a commitment of time and talent which adds value to the license. The 'use' is investment. Balance of original post has been REDACTED. |
#685
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
Dave wrote:
George Orwell wrote: Al Klein said: Eliminating a requirement is dumbing things down. But no one would expect you to be able to understand that. Well, let me ask, from the point of view of a potential noob to the hobby. What use is the code requirements? The 'use' is something you just can't understand. The 'use' is a commitment of time and talent which adds value to the license. The 'use' is investment. the use is hazing why not just coem out and say that Balance of original post has been REDACTED. |
#686
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
Dave wrote:
George Orwell wrote: Al Klein said: Eliminating a requirement is dumbing things down. But no one would expect you to be able to understand that. Well, let me ask, from the point of view of a potential noob to the hobby. What use is the code requirements? The 'use' is something you just can't understand. The 'use' is a commitment of time and talent which adds value to the license. The 'use' is investment. In other words, you just can't come up with a valid reason other than some emotional-traditional one, can you? What is the return on that "investment?" Being good enough to do 1930s radio operating? In a diversified HOBBY? What you really seem to be saying is that "everyone has to do it because you did it...so there, nyah, nyah..." :-) Balance of original post has been REDACTED. You have been redacted. You have been rejected. You have been inducted. Here's a news flash: The job of the FCC (the agency that grants amateur radio licenses...and hundreds of others...) is to regulate and mitigate all USA civil radio. It does not tailor ham tests to some nebulous "tradition" of the Archaic Radiotelegraphy Society (ARS). I.E., it has no reason to demand anyone take a manual morse code test except under the lobbying by the ARRL. If you want to "preserve" the ARS as requiring morsemanship for all privileges below 30 MHz, then you need to make up a Petition and submit it to the FCC. You can even ask them to RENAME the ARS to Archaic Radiotelegraphy Society. The FCC allows such petitioning. They even explain how to do it on their website. Tell the FCC that you insist on maintaining 1930s standards of radio communication well beyond 2030 by keeping that morse code test forever and ever. The ARRL will love you for it. Go for it! |
#687
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW..., would Robesin still be an idiot?
|
#688
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that persondie?
I'll say it again ... INVESTMENT!!
If an activity is to have value it must have INVESTMENT. Whether it be Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, Little League coach, Soccer MOM, fishing, poker playing, or just watching tv. All require INVESTMENT if it is to have value. If you don't/can't make the INVESTMENT, find something else to become involved with. It has nothing to do with hazing. - - - an old friend wrote: Dave wrote: George Orwell wrote: Al Klein said: Eliminating a requirement is dumbing things down. But no one would expect you to be able to understand that. Well, let me ask, from the point of view of a potential noob to the hobby. What use is the code requirements? The 'use' is something you just can't understand. The 'use' is a commitment of time and talent which adds value to the license. The 'use' is investment. the use is hazing why not just coem out and say that Balance of original post has been REDACTED. |
#689
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
"George Orwell" wrote in message ... Al Klein said: Eliminating a requirement is dumbing things down. But no one would expect you to be able to understand that. Well, let me ask, from the point of view of a potential noob to the hobby. What use is the code requirements? I can't really see in today's era, the need for them? I've been surfing around looking at ham and talking to an old friend that had a license and it look interesting to me. But, given that many professional people like myself are stretched for time, what good does all the licensing and code requirements do for you besides build up boundries to doing something new and fun? If you will read Part 97 (the rules that govern amateur radio), the government doesn't care about you doing something new and fun. The section on basis and purpose makes it quite clear that their objectives are quite different. They want people knowledgeable in ham radio and who are interested in expanding that knowledge. I'm in a pretty technical field, and I study to keep up in that field everyday, the last thing I want to do, is have to spend my weekends studying to talk on a radio. If less stringent requirements were there, I could easily afford the tools of the trade, and would like to just jump in and start working with a ham setup. I'm particularly interested in exploring the amateur radio/computer connections. I have no problem informally looking up information and learning on my own (heck, that's what I'm doing in the USENET group to begin with)...but, I just don't have the time for archaic rules, regulations and codes that as far as I can see...really serve no real purpose but, to keep out busy people that might like to participate. Until and unless you have actually participated in amateur radio in a wide variety of aspects, it is difficult to asses which rules, regulations, knowledge, etc are archaic and which should remain as requirements. Notice that the majority of people advocating ditching requirements are those who have not yet passed those requirements, regardless of their age. Note that the majority of people advocating keeping the requirements have passed them and have experience in amateur radio again regardless of their age. As far as "busy people" go, again refer to the basis and purpose as given in the rules. The government is not concerned about your choice of how you use your time. It has no bearing on what their goals are. Can you give me valid reasons as to what useful purpose in today's age they serve? Every piece of knowledge has its uses. The difficult part is winnowing through it and decide what should be tested and what should not. Here's why I think code should still be tested: 1. It is still one of the basic building blocks of ham radio. For example, one of the "hot" digital modes is PSK31. The developer drew upon personal experience and incorporated features derived from that mode to make a robust digital mode. 2. Because it is not "book learning", too many people will avoid it since it is different than the type of learning they are accustomed to. They will falsely think it is hard when in reality it is different. Requiring them to learn it gets them over that resistance hump. 3. Each and every mode has its strong points and weak points. Each of us that participate in ham radio should attempt to gain personal experience in those modes so that we know by that personal experience what those strengths and weaknesses are. If you are interested, I could construct various scenarios where mode X is the best mode. However, unless you specifically want to know, I won't clutter up the newsgroup at this time with discussions that have been repeated many times by many people already. Dee, N8UZE |
#690
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that persondie?
LenAnderson, You have obviously made an INVESTMENT in your technical profession.
Make one in your participation in the radio service!! Amateur Radio is a SERVICE!!! If you only think of it as a hobby your thinking is flawed. /s/ Dave, BSEE, Program Chief Engineer-retired, LGM-118A(RS), MK21/W87 http://www.strategic-air-command.com/missiles/Peacekeeper/Peacekeeper_Missile_Home_Page.htm - - - |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Persuing a Career in Electronics, HELP! | Homebrew | |||
Bonafied Proof of LIFE AFTER DEATH -- Coal Mine Rescue | Shortwave |