Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 14th 06, 04:49 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 997
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?

On 12 Aug 2006 15:42:50 -0700, "an old friend"
wrote:

oncce you accpet that much of the testing involves memizztion the
question then comes down to where is your beef?


Those who memorize answers instead of learning concepts - what you
would have seen at the beginning of the thread had you paid attention.

you tread awfully close to libel there AL


Look up the definition of "libel". Part of it is "malicious
defamation". Calling a penny a cent isn't malicious, nor is it
defamatory.

ask an lawyer if you don't believe me


You need to take your own advice. Also you need to ask an English
teacher - you don't seem to know the definitions of a lot of very
common words.
  #2   Report Post  
Old August 14th 06, 09:12 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 997
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:36:29 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:49:32 -0400, Al Klein
wrote:
On 12 Aug 2006 15:42:50 -0700, "an old friend"
wrote:


oncce you accpet that much of the testing involves memizztion the
question then comes down to where is your beef?


Those who memorize answers instead of learning concepts - what you
would have seen at the beginning of the thread had you paid attention.


I did


your point are a defference that makes no deffenerce that you can
explain


In a way that you can understand. Since you demonstrate so little
understanding of anything, that's no surprise.

you tread awfully close to libel there AL


Look up the definition of "libel". Part of it is "malicious
defamation". Calling a penny a cent isn't malicious, nor is it
defamatory.


but calling someone a cheat on federal requirement is


Post a link to my post calling you "a cheat on federal requirement" -
or even just calling you a cheat.

ask an lawyer if you don't believe me


You need to take your own advice. Also you need to ask an English
teacher - you don't seem to know the definitions of a lot of very
common words.


that is your peoblem dancing over minutia you don't seem to understand


Pot - kettle - ebon.
  #3   Report Post  
Old August 14th 06, 09:45 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,614
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that persondie?

Al Klein wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:36:29 -0400, wrote:
but calling someone a cheat on federal requirement is


Post a link to my post calling you "a cheat on federal requirement" -
or even just calling you a cheat.


I seem to recall you saying that anyone who didn't take
his test at an FCC office probably cheated.
--
73, Cecil
http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
  #4   Report Post  
Old August 14th 06, 09:48 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 954
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?


Cecil Moore wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:36:29 -0400, wrote:
but calling someone a cheat on federal requirement is


Post a link to my post calling you "a cheat on federal requirement" -
or even just calling you a cheat.


I seem to recall you saying that anyone who didn't take
his test at an FCC office probably cheated.

oh that doesn't count for who took the test having crawled though
broken glas in blizzard up hill both ways
--
73, Cecil
http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

  #5   Report Post  
Old August 15th 06, 02:44 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 997
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:45:32 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Al Klein wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:36:29 -0400, wrote:
but calling someone a cheat on federal requirement is


Post a link to my post calling you "a cheat on federal requirement" -
or even just calling you a cheat.


I seem to recall you saying that anyone who didn't take
his test at an FCC office probably cheated.


Your memory is THAT faulty? Maybe it's just part of being lazy.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Persuing a Career in Electronics, HELP! Justin Homebrew 18 August 1st 03 07:02 AM
Bonafied Proof of LIFE AFTER DEATH -- Coal Mine Rescue Ed Conrad Shortwave 0 July 6th 03 12:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017