From: on Wed, Sep 6 2006 4:37 am


wrote:

I would like to talk about the ISSUE
of the code test but this arena is NOT the place.

That's because of *your* behavior, Len.

Oh, oh, M. Superior got her knickers in a twist again
and tries to ruler-spank... :-)

I have had many civilized, respectful, well-behaved code-test
discussions here with Phil Kane, K2ASP and Bill Sohl, K2UNK. The latter
is a director of No-Code International, and is one of the staunchest
no-code-test advocates around. Yet he makes his points without the
name-calling and personal insults that are your stock-in-trade whenever
someone disagrees with you. Same for K2ASP.

Cut the crap, Jimmy. Quit trying to present yourself as
the oh-so-very-SUPERIOR "Mr. Perfect." You are NOT perfect
nor an "example of good comportment." You come across as
both superior and arrogant...plus the total inflexibility of
considering other folks' opinions and viewpoints.

This is NOT a thread to discuss OLD HISTORY of US amateur
radio as spoon-fed you by the ARRL. The ARRL is NOT a group
of "perfect" leaders with "perfect" comportment, either.

Jimmy, if you can't stand newsgroup heat, get OUT. It
obviously upsets you to be challenged or not recognized
as a "newsgroup leader."

Both of them have disappeared from rrap.

ERROR! Bill and Phil are still in Google archives. Anyone
can go look for themselves.

I stop back once in a while to see if things have changed.

How noble of you. :-)

I post a few license numbers here, and you're off on a tear
with insults and general adherence to your profile.

Poor baby. More evidence of how you can't stand the heat
of newsgroup behavior. You crib someone else's stats
without giving them credit, then repeat boilerplate
paragraphs that are seven yours old, implying that those
are "yours" and you get all upset about being called on
that? ANYONE can find statistics on the number of
licensees and classes and the growth/loss figures. See
QRZ and Hamdata for two readily-accessible sources.

Tsk, you have serious problems with PAST disagreements.
Back at the last restructuring you tried to play with
percentages to somehow "prove" that the Technician class
belongs in the code-tested group because code zealot
Speroni lumped them together in HIS biased-for-code
website. That's all in the Google Archives but one has
to go back a few years to see it. A transparent attempt
Jimmy and several called you out on it. That's also in
archives.

It's easy to tell when you start losing an argument - that's when you
start with the nicknames and personal insults.

Being against morse code testing IS a "personal insult" to
any Code Zealot. TS for them. :-)

Tsk, more evidence of the self-described "superiority" of
the Code Zealots. THEY can do NO wrong...such as Robeson,
Heil, "Slow-Blow Code" and others, all having maximum-rate
code-tested licenses (unknown about Blow Code who won't
state his/her callsign). Not to mention the anony-mousies
such as "Thomas Edison" or "Not Cocksucker Lloyd," etc.

You concentrate on ONE or TWO posters at a time, Jimmy,
always denigrating and claiming "error" on the part of no-
code-test advocates. You are obviously subjective as hell
while claiming "objectivity." Total PR bull****, Jimmy.

This forum
has degraded to self-important insulters trying to outdo
other self-important insulters with heaping gobs of plain
filth in print.

Whose fault is that? Not mine.

Tsk, tsk, did YOU think that sentence was about YOU?!? Good
grief, you have a great big EGO problem, superior Jimmy.

Go apply your Mother Superior ruler-spanking on THEM if you
want to strike a blow for morsemanship. Got the guts? Or
do you consider yourself so "superior" that you don't engage
in plebian behavior?

---

You should work on your PEOPLE SKILLS, Jimmy.