Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
Fred Hambrecht wrote: So are you saying that CW no longer works? Not to be judgmental, but your an idiot. wrote in message ... On Sat, 9 Sep 2006 18:35:14 -0400, "Fred Hambrecht" wrote: in the begining it conveyed data other radio radio services as well as the ars today it does not http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ Even if spelled correctly [you're, not your] Fred is definitely NOT saying his thing with civility. :-) Freddie, Mark was saying that - IN THE BEGINNING - ALL radio services used morse code...and the first US radio regulating agency wanted all to show competency in this common mode so that the agency to communicate with all users. That era has long since passed into oblivion. Just ain't no other radio services using manual morse code for communications now. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
Cecil Moore wrote in
om: funkbastler wrote: ... I gotta think that if I managed to learn Morse code, then so can "they". I'm sure that drivers licenses applicants can learn to use buggy whips on their horseless carriages, but should they be required to? They should if they want to be good back seat drivers. SC |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
Dee Flint wrote:
Someone skilled in driving a vehicle with a manual transmission and actually using it can reap a number of performance benefits. These include improved gas mileage, better passing performance, better performance in hilly terrain, etc. If people were required to learn how to drive vehicles with manual transmissions, more of them might actually choose to drive such vehicles. Dee, N8UZE Not all of those statements are always true. As fond as I am of manual transmissions, sometimes automatics have the advantage. A hydraulic torque converter with a manually controlled "automatic" transmission is better at drag racing than a manual gearbox under many conditions. This is less true under road race conditions where the lower torque needed to be handled by the transmission allows the newer style "manual" transmissions to change gears in milliseconds. The secret is 2 transmissions, one for the odd gears, one for the even, and 2 clutches, you are literally in 2 gears at the same time for a short period of time. Takes a lot of computer control. That's one way to do it, there are others. The landscape is very blurred nowadays concerning what is a manual and what is an automatic transmission, with "manuals" in modern race cars being more automatic than "automatics" in non-race cars. And the state of CW vs digital is about the same. Except CW can always be beat if your PC works. You just need to select the correct mode. tom K0TAR |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
Slow Code wrote: wrote in ups.com: Slow Code wrote: I could support that. SC I support licensing for life. Whimp! SC Whimp??? I'll thumb wrestle you for it. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
"Tom Ring" wrote in message .. . Dee Flint wrote: Someone skilled in driving a vehicle with a manual transmission and actually using it can reap a number of performance benefits. These include improved gas mileage, better passing performance, better performance in hilly terrain, etc. If people were required to learn how to drive vehicles with manual transmissions, more of them might actually choose to drive such vehicles. Dee, N8UZE Not all of those statements are always true. As fond as I am of manual transmissions, sometimes automatics have the advantage. A hydraulic torque converter with a manually controlled "automatic" transmission is better at drag racing than a manual gearbox under many conditions. Never said they were always true. And most of us do not put racing equipment in our personal, daily use street vehicles. This is less true under road race conditions where the lower torque needed to be handled by the transmission allows the newer style "manual" transmissions to change gears in milliseconds. The secret is 2 transmissions, one for the odd gears, one for the even, and 2 clutches, you are literally in 2 gears at the same time for a short period of time. Takes a lot of computer control. That's one way to do it, there are others. The landscape is very blurred nowadays concerning what is a manual and what is an automatic transmission, with "manuals" in modern race cars being more automatic than "automatics" in non-race cars. Again this does not affect the ordinary driver. And the state of CW vs digital is about the same. Except CW can always be beat if your PC works. You just need to select the correct mode. tom K0TAR That last statement is a fallacy. The digital modes are wiped out by conditions that will still permit CW to be used. Even SSB can sometimes be used when conditions wipe out the digital. I have repeatedly said and now I am emphasizing: EVERY MODE HAS ITS UNIQUE ADVANTAGES AND UNIQUE DISADVANTAGES. It seems that people wish to deny that whatever mode they don't want to deal with has any advantages whatsoever. They also wish to attribute magic properties to whatever is their favorite mode. Both points of view are foolish. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
Tom Ring wrote:
And the state of CW vs digital is about the same. Except CW can always be beat if your PC works. You just need to select the correct mode. PACTOR II works for me when I cannot even hear the signal. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
Dee Flint wrote:
That last statement is a fallacy. The digital modes are wiped out by conditions that will still permit CW to be used. Even SSB can sometimes be used when conditions wipe out the digital. I have repeatedly said and now I snip Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Wrong. There are digital modes that handle every distortion type that exists. You just have to pick the correct one. tom K0TAR |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
Dee Flint wrote:
The digital modes are wiped out by conditions that will still permit CW to be used. CW is wiped out by conditions that will still permit PACTOR II to be used, e.g. I cannot hear any signals at all on an apparently dead band and a friend in Germany pops up on the screen. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | CB | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules | General |