Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
"Tom Ring" wrote in message .. . Dee Flint wrote: "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Dee Flint wrote: I repeat: EVERY MODE HAS ITS ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES. To deny that is foolish. Every brand of vehicle has its advantages and disadvantages but I don't see the government forcing anyone to buy a Chevrolet. What is wrong with a free market of modes? Nobody is forcing anyone not to use CW. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com That analogy doesn't work at all. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Why not? Picking what you want to use isn't okay? You don't want alternatives to CW. Or alternatives to digital? Or , for that matter, alternatives to voice modes. So for you choice is bad? tom K0TAR Different brands of cars are not dissimilar enough to compare to different types of modes so the analogy doesn't work. The different brands of cars (Chevy, Ford, Chrysler, etc) are more like comparing a Bencher paddle to an MFJ paddle to a Kent paddle, etc. If you use CW, you pick your own type of paddle. If you drive, you pick your own type of car. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message . .. Dee Flint wrote: "Cecil Moore" wrote in message Every brand of vehicle has its advantages and disadvantages but I don't see the government forcing anyone to buy a Chevrolet. What is wrong with a free market of modes? Nobody is forcing anyone not to use CW. That analogy doesn't work at all. I should have said "4WD" instead of "Chevrolet". -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com That doesn't work either. That comparison would be like comparing a straight key to an electronic keyer. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
funkbastler wrote: On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 22:19:21 GMT, Slow Code wrote: There is no arguing that. KB9RQZ is living proof. Well, I don't know KB9RQZ - but I'll say thay he's entitled to have and express his opinions, same as you and I, whether you or I agree with him or not. Y'all try to stay away from the ad hominem stuff now - it never convinces anybody of anything. Just ****es 'em off. There's nothing "ad hominem" about comments directed towards Morkie the Moron, KB9RQZ. His CV of idiocity is volumous. Steve, K4YZ |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
Dee Flint wrote:
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message I should have said "4WD" instead of "Chevrolet". That doesn't work either. That comparison would be like comparing a straight key to an electronic keyer. It works perfectly. A 4WD could save your life when it would be lost in a 2WD. So why shouldn't the government mandate ownership of 4WD's only? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message .. . Dee Flint wrote: "Cecil Moore" wrote in message I should have said "4WD" instead of "Chevrolet". That doesn't work either. That comparison would be like comparing a straight key to an electronic keyer. It works perfectly. A 4WD could save your life when it would be lost in a 2WD. So why shouldn't the government mandate ownership of 4WD's only? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com Still doesn't work since the FCC doesn't mandate use of CW. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
Dee Flint wrote:
Still doesn't work since the FCC doesn't mandate use of CW. But it does mandate ownership of CW. Think about it. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
Cecil Moore wrote:
Dee Flint wrote: Still doesn't work since the FCC doesn't mandate use of CW. But it does mandate ownership of CW. Think about it. Should have been: But it does mandate ownership of a CW modem. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message .. . Dee Flint wrote: Still doesn't work since the FCC doesn't mandate use of CW. But it does mandate ownership of CW. Think about it. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com Not if you're not into amateur radio. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
Dee Flint wrote:
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message .. . Dee Flint wrote: Still doesn't work since the FCC doesn't mandate use of CW. But it does mandate ownership of CW. Think about it. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com Not if you're not into amateur radio. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Dee Keep beating that horse. It may be dead, but I'm sure that with your enthusiastic efforts it will be on its feet in no time. tom K0TAR |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
"Barry OGrady" wrote in message ... Code has been eliminated completely as a requirement for amateur radio since 2 years ago, and its not coming back. I have a full call with no code. Barry While that is true in your country, it is not yet true here. The international conference simply left it up to each individual country as to whether or not to require it. Dee, N8UZE |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | CB | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules | General |