| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
September 10th 06, 01:26 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message . net... funkbastler wrote: No, but it darned sure wouldn't hurt to make sure they could drive something with a standard transmission. Would you have 1000 people learn to drive a standard transmission even though only one person out of those 1000 people benefits from it? The cost/benefit ratio is extremely high. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com Someone skilled in driving a vehicle with a manual transmission and actually using it can reap a number of performance benefits. These include improved gas mileage, better passing performance, better performance in hilly terrain, etc. If people were required to learn how to drive vehicles with manual transmissions, more of them might actually choose to drive such vehicles. Dee, N8UZE |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| 05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? | Policy | |||
| Why You Don't Like The ARRL | CB | |||
| Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Shortwave | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
| There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules | General | |||
Threaded Mode
