Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Al Klein wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:38:36 -0400, "L." wrote: Oh and as for the "Koran" being less violent than the Bible - Ah.......... then WHY is OBL and his "fairy" band of cock sucking followers vowing that ALL Christians, Jews, etc. SHOULD DIE if not following ISLAM who "uses" the "KORAN"? Same reason all of Christendom wanted to kill all non-Christians in the Holy Lands back in the Crusades? Same reason Catholics killed Protestants and Protestants killed Catholics in the Hundred Years' War? Same Reason Christians tried to eliminate all non-Christians in Armenia in the early part of the last century? On the whole there's a larger percentage of bloodthirsty-against-not-us Christians than there is in any other religion. BTW, the only part of Islam that follows the tenets that OBL does, as far as killing all infidels, is the Wahabi sect, which is as much a part of mainstream Islam as Santoria is part of mainstream Christianity. When's the last time they killed a goat on the altar at St. Pat's? Or committed acts of cannibalism, uh, wait don't push sen |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Painter" wrote in message
... Al Klein wrote: On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:38:36 -0400, "L." wrote: Oh and as for the "Koran" being less violent than the Bible - Ah.......... then WHY is OBL and his "fairy" band of cock sucking followers vowing that ALL Christians, Jews, etc. SHOULD DIE if not following ISLAM who "uses" the "KORAN"? Same reason all of Christendom wanted to kill all non-Christians in the Holy Lands back in the Crusades? Same reason Catholics killed Protestants and Protestants killed Catholics in the Hundred Years' War? Same Reason Christians tried to eliminate all non-Christians in Armenia in the early part of the last century? On the whole there's a larger percentage of bloodthirsty-against-not-us Christians than there is in any other religion. BTW, the only part of Islam that follows the tenets that OBL does, as far as killing all infidels, is the Wahabi sect, which is as much a part of mainstream Islam as Santoria is part of mainstream Christianity. When's the last time they killed a goat on the altar at St. Pat's? Or committed acts of cannibalism, uh, wait don't push sen "I" haven't mentioned - that Christianity was or wasn't a cause of wars - I called the bible a "history" book. It DOES speak of wars. Hell, even when Christ supposedly was taken, there was upheaval. MY point wasn't with all that crap - mine was "strictly" dealing with the "Koran" which Mike seems to be pushing and my disgust with it and the cock sucker currently using it for his excuse to murder. The one "responsible" for bringing the towers down. L. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:35:26 -0400, "L." wrote:
"I" haven't mentioned - that Christianity was or wasn't a cause of wars - I called the bible a "history" book. Only if you consider "history" to refer to fiction. It DOES speak of wars. Hell, even when Christ supposedly was taken, there was upheaval. MY point wasn't with all that crap - mine was "strictly" dealing with the "Koran" which Mike seems to be pushing and my disgust with it and the cock sucker currently using it for his excuse to murder. The one "responsible" for bringing the towers down. The one responsible for the towers will most likely be judged by history to be a Christian. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Al Klein wrote: On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:35:26 -0400, "L." wrote: "I" haven't mentioned - that Christianity was or wasn't a cause of wars - I called the bible a "history" book. Only if you consider "history" to refer to fiction. It DOES speak of wars. Hell, even when Christ supposedly was taken, there was upheaval. MY point wasn't with all that crap - mine was "strictly" dealing with the "Koran" which Mike seems to be pushing and my disgust with it and the cock sucker currently using it for his excuse to murder. The one "responsible" for bringing the towers down. The one responsible for the towers will most likely be judged by history to be a Christian. Iknow I am gonna regret this.. but who "will most likely be judged by history" to be responsible for the towers.. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kurt Ullman" wrote in message
... In article , Al Klein wrote: On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:35:26 -0400, "L." wrote: "I" haven't mentioned - that Christianity was or wasn't a cause of wars - I called the bible a "history" book. Only if you consider "history" to refer to fiction. It DOES speak of wars. Hell, even when Christ supposedly was taken, there was upheaval. MY point wasn't with all that crap - mine was "strictly" dealing with the "Koran" which Mike seems to be pushing and my disgust with it and the cock sucker currently using it for his excuse to murder. The one "responsible" for bringing the towers down. The one responsible for the towers will most likely be judged by history to be a Christian. Iknow I am gonna regret this.. but who "will most likely be judged by history" to be responsible for the towers.. I can't answer the "last" question with certainty but I am willing to bet in some eyes, it will be "Bush". And in saying that, "I" am "NOT" blaming him. It just seems like the President of the day always takes the heat. As to the remark of the one bringing them down - deemed a "Christian"? THAT IS FUNNY............ though you may be right! History will bear it out one way or another. Further - I heard this AM, the Pope apologized to the MOOSELEMS - apparently for talking crap on them (deservedly so - in my book). They didn't deserve an apology. Also, the news was that they killed a nun and others. So they've proven themselves once again. They can't pick on someone prepared to kick their ass. THEY'RE YELLOW BELLIED PUSSIES. The same **** I've been saying - they're a bunch of murdering cock suckers who wants all to bow down to them. I heard that somewhere in the Koran - that it is written that all "infidels" will convert to ISLAM "or" die by the sword. And that is a "peaceful religion"? MY ASS..... I STILL say - they can KISS MY ASS. Stick the Koran/Quaran or however you spell - it up your ass. It is no more peace preaching than the Bible. With all the Priests, preachers, ministers, nuns, etc. - if there was to be peace, there would be with all the preaching going on. Same with the rest - NO ONE CARES. Then this band of merry cocksucking murderers comes along and says we must convert....... THAT IS HILARIOUS. DREAM ON - DICK HEADS I'll be an infidel as long as they're sucking each others cocks - including their donkeys, camels, and other animals cocks as well. THAT is what I think of them. I'm not afraid, they can only kill me once. Ya got to go sometime! L. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kurt Ullman" wrote in message
... In article , Al Klein wrote: On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:35:26 -0400, "L." wrote: "I" haven't mentioned - that Christianity was or wasn't a cause of wars - I called the bible a "history" book. Only if you consider "history" to refer to fiction. It DOES speak of wars. Hell, even when Christ supposedly was taken, there was upheaval. MY point wasn't with all that crap - mine was "strictly" dealing with the "Koran" which Mike seems to be pushing and my disgust with it and the cock sucker currently using it for his excuse to murder. The one "responsible" for bringing the towers down. The one responsible for the towers will most likely be judged by history to be a Christian. Iknow I am gonna regret this.. but who "will most likely be judged by history" to be responsible for the towers.. I can't answer the "last" question with certainty but I am willing to bet in some eyes, it will be "Bush". And in saying that, "I" am "NOT" blaming him. It just seems like the President of the day always takes the heat. As to the remark of the one bringing them down - deemed a "Christian"? THAT IS FUNNY............ though you may be right! History will bear it out one way or another. Further - I heard this AM, the Pope apologized to the MOOSELEMS - apparently for talking crap on them (deservedly so - in my book). They didn't deserve an apology. Also, the news was that they killed a nun and others. So they've proven themselves once again. They can't pick on someone prepared to kick their ass. THEY'RE YELLOW BELLIED PUSSIES. The same **** I've been saying - they're a bunch of murdering cock suckers who wants all to bow down to them. I heard that somewhere in the Koran - that it is written that all "infidels" will convert to ISLAM "or" die by the sword. And that is a "peaceful religion"? MY ASS..... I STILL say - they can KISS MY ASS. Stick the Koran/Quaran or however you spell - it up your ass. It is no more peace preaching than the Bible. With all the Priests, preachers, ministers, nuns, etc. - if there was to be peace, there would be with all the preaching going on. Same with the rest - NO ONE CARES. Then this band of merry cocksucking murderers comes along and says we must convert....... THAT IS HILARIOUS. DREAM ON - DICK HEADS I'll be an infidel as long as they're sucking each others cocks - including their donkeys, camels, and other animals cocks as well. THAT is what I think of them. I'm not afraid, they can only kill me once. Ya got to go sometime! L. Damned, not that I disagree, but looks like I got a forger! L. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "L." wrote in message ... "Kurt Ullman" wrote in message ... In article , Al Klein wrote: On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:35:26 -0400, "L." wrote: "I" haven't mentioned - that Christianity was or wasn't a cause of wars - I called the bible a "history" book. Only if you consider "history" to refer to fiction. It DOES speak of wars. Hell, even when Christ supposedly was taken, there was upheaval. MY point wasn't with all that crap - mine was "strictly" dealing with the "Koran" which Mike seems to be pushing and my disgust with it and the cock sucker currently using it for his excuse to murder. The one "responsible" for bringing the towers down. The one responsible for the towers will most likely be judged by history to be a Christian. Iknow I am gonna regret this.. but who "will most likely be judged by history" to be responsible for the towers.. I can't answer the "last" question with certainty but I am willing to bet in some eyes, it will be "Bush". And in saying that, "I" am "NOT" blaming him. It just seems like the President of the day always takes the heat. As to the remark of the one bringing them down - deemed a "Christian"? THAT IS FUNNY............ though you may be right! History will bear it out one way or another. Further - I heard this AM, the Pope apologized to the MOOSELEMS - apparently for talking crap on them (deservedly so - in my book). They didn't deserve an apology. Also, the news was that they killed a nun and others. So they've proven themselves once again. They can't pick on someone prepared to kick their ass. THEY'RE YELLOW BELLIED PUSSIES. The same **** I've been saying - they're a bunch of murdering cock suckers who wants all to bow down to them. I heard that somewhere in the Koran - that it is written that all "infidels" will convert to ISLAM "or" die by the sword. And that is a "peaceful religion"? MY ASS..... I STILL say - they can KISS MY ASS. Stick the Koran/Quaran or however you spell - it up your ass. It is no more peace preaching than the Bible. With all the Priests, preachers, ministers, nuns, etc. - if there was to be peace, there would be with all the preaching going on. Same with the rest - NO ONE CARES. Then this band of merry cocksucking murderers comes along and says we must convert....... THAT IS HILARIOUS. DREAM ON - DICK HEADS I'll be an infidel as long as they're sucking each others cocks - including their donkeys, camels, and other animals cocks as well. THAT is what I think of them. I'm not afraid, they can only kill me once. Ya got to go sometime! L. Damned, not that I disagree, but looks like I got a forger! L. ?????????? Looks like my old pal (a troublemaker) is up to it again. Using my business name to make trouble. I posted an ad in a group which we had an issue in a while back. I guess he used it. I know he was good for hacking. "Sorry" for the intrusion.......... clfurent |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
L. wrote:
"Mike Painter" wrote in message ... Al Klein wrote: On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:38:36 -0400, "L." wrote: Oh and as for the "Koran" being less violent than the Bible - Ah.......... then WHY is OBL and his "fairy" band of cock sucking followers vowing that ALL Christians, Jews, etc. SHOULD DIE if not following ISLAM who "uses" the "KORAN"? Same reason all of Christendom wanted to kill all non-Christians in the Holy Lands back in the Crusades? Same reason Catholics killed Protestants and Protestants killed Catholics in the Hundred Years' War? Same Reason Christians tried to eliminate all non-Christians in Armenia in the early part of the last century? On the whole there's a larger percentage of bloodthirsty-against-not-us Christians than there is in any other religion. BTW, the only part of Islam that follows the tenets that OBL does, as far as killing all infidels, is the Wahabi sect, which is as much a part of mainstream Islam as Santoria is part of mainstream Christianity. When's the last time they killed a goat on the altar at St. Pat's? Or committed acts of cannibalism, uh, wait don't push sen "I" haven't mentioned - that Christianity was or wasn't a cause of wars - I called the bible a "history" book. It DOES speak of wars. Hell, even when Christ supposedly was taken, there was upheaval. MY point wasn't with all that crap - mine was "strictly" dealing with the "Koran" which Mike seems to be pushing and my disgust with it and the cock sucker currently using it for his excuse to murder. The one "responsible" for bringing the towers down. Mike is pushing nothing. Mike is pointing out that you have a sound bite education and that you know nothing of mainstream Islam. There are places called libraries and they have things called books. But they take more than 30 seconds to read. The bible is a *very* poor history book. Even in cases where a story tells of towns that existed at some point in time as in the Exodus, they frequently did not exist within hundreds of years of each other. As for the major people in the stories, if they existed they had neither the might or power that was described. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|