Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Wow, thank you for all of the advice everyone. Apparently I have some more reading to do... In the meantime I put together an off-center dipole 48" up 18" down using aluminum wire. I understand there are probably better options, but this provides significant improvement over what I had before. Just one question about this antenna - how would one estimate the impedance? I don't have an impedance analyzer. I have read in this NG that the impedance will be roughly 300 Ohm, and that a TV-type balun would bring it down to 75, which would be better than 300 if not ideal. I have read elsewhere that it will be roughly 75 Ohm and no balun is necessary. What is the truth? I do have a 4:1 balun that would work if impedance is around 300, but if impedance is around 75 would there be any benefit or harm in using it? Thank you all again, Paul |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:23:49 GMT, Paul Monaghan
wrote: Just one question about this antenna - how would one estimate the impedance? I don't have an impedance analyzer. I have read in this NG that the impedance will be roughly 300 Ohm, and that a TV-type balun would bring it down to 75, which would be better than 300 if not ideal. I have read elsewhere that it will be roughly 75 Ohm and no balun is necessary. What is the truth? The truth is that a scanner that covers a wide range of frequencies rarely shows 50 ohms, and that's only over a very narrow frequency range, so I wouldn't worry about it. Putting on a balun may improve reception on some frequencies, only to degrade it on others. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|