LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #18   Report Post  
Old October 11th 06, 04:53 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 12
Default It was a mistake for the ITU to eliminate the CW requirement.

Diamond Dave wrote:
Good for you! It's not often that someone would come right out and admit that a
radop that can copy high speed CW is better than himself, but you did.
Congrats!


could I have the honor of knowing your call sign?
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
It was a mistake for the ITU to eliminate the CW requirement. Slow Code Policy 59 October 30th 06 12:55 AM
It was a mistake for the ITU to eliminate the CW requirement. Slow Code Antenna 37 October 28th 06 11:07 PM
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems Paul Policy 0 January 10th 05 05:41 PM
Eliminate the CW requirement for General & Extra, BUT THEN... Bill Wright Policy 12 December 9th 03 03:20 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017