LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #24   Report Post  
Old October 20th 06, 03:36 AM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 55
Default CW-forever Guys are gonna go balistic!

wrote:
On 19 Oct 2006 07:34:27 -0700,
wrote:

why do you presume to think they don't read len ader particualrly


Because he's a non-stakeholder who has been blatantly abusing his right
to comment on matters before the FCC involving the amateur service for
years. A presumption based on applied common sense and experience.


where has he iditeifed himself as a no stakeholder as far as I know
he is a citizen?


We can all toss comments at all NPRMs, that's not the point. The topic
under discussion is Anderson's behavior during ham NPRM commenting
periods and the way the FCC probably handles his "comments". As far as
stakes go Anderson himself made it transparently clear years ago that
he has no stake whatsoever in the regulation of the amateur radio
service when he stated that he is not a ham and does not have any
intention of becoming a ham in the future.

and what abuse?


Flooding the FCC with 200 comments on one ham radio NPRM is juvenile
and abusive behavior every way you look at it. And it's not in the
direction of supporting the cause of you NCTAs.

did you read a different constituions than I


Again that's not the point, the point is how his submissions are
regarded and dealt with after the FCC has processed them in accordance
with all the laws under which they operate. You gotta be as naive as a
newborn if you think the FCC attaches as much value to any of
Anderson's nonsense as they do, for instance, to the inputs submitted
by the ARRL.

nope they know full well they wait long and someone will mount a legal
chalenge to code testing and that will be that


Could be but until somebody actually lays down the cash it takes to
mount the challenge you're waiting for y'all behave yourself Colonel
and stay above 30 Mhz.


indeed the cash is problem I was well on the way leading to the NPRM
then the backer back out thinking the FCC is finaly goign to take care
it


Usta be's, shoulda done's and could've beens are a dime a dozen, you
either walk the walk or you don't.

the longer thay wait the more likely the challange become but they
(the ffc ) are on record as saying it will be out after the onibus and
before the end of the years


Don't let the suspense keep you awake at night.

w3rv

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CW-forever Guys are gonna go balistic! Iitoi Policy 81 November 15th 06 10:59 PM
CW-forever Guys are gonna go balistic! Slow Code Antenna 25 October 30th 06 11:31 PM
i confess Steveo CB 18 December 15th 04 05:20 AM
THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP NEEDS MACHO MEN AND TOUGH GUYS Andre Shortwave 1 July 5th 03 12:03 PM
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? LLOYD DAVIES N0VFP General 0 July 4th 03 04:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017