Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 16th 06, 12:29 AM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default A non renewable no-code license is a good idea.

It provides an incentive to keeping studying and building radio skills so
you can graduate to a more permanent higher class license. Those that
fail to upgrade, no loss, we don't need them anyway. We want quality
operators. If you want quantity, go to CB.

SC
  #2   Report Post  
Old November 16th 06, 02:00 AM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 27
Default A non renewable no-code license is a good idea.

It's irrelevant. The code requirement is going away soon. Then what will
you bitch about?


"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...
It provides an incentive to keeping studying and building radio skills so
you can graduate to a more permanent higher class license. Those that
fail to upgrade, no loss, we don't need them anyway. We want quality
operators. If you want quantity, go to CB.

SC



  #3   Report Post  
Old November 17th 06, 12:55 AM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default A non renewable no-code license is a good idea.

"DougSlug" wrote in
:

It's irrelevant. The code requirement is going away soon. Then what
will you bitch about?



The same thing as the rest of you, ****ty operators on the bands.

SC
  #4   Report Post  
Old November 17th 06, 01:36 AM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 570
Default A non renewable no-code license is a good idea.


"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...
"DougSlug" wrote in
:

It's irrelevant. The code requirement is going away soon. Then what
will you bitch about?



The same thing as the rest of you, ****ty operators on the bands.

SC


But there will be more OO's, so you'll soon have your license revoked. Aw
****, it is already, isn't it?


  #5   Report Post  
Old November 18th 06, 01:20 AM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default A non renewable no-code license is a good idea.

Slow Code wrote in
ink.net:

"DougSlug" wrote in
:

It's irrelevant. The code requirement is going away soon. Then what
will you bitch about?



The same thing as the rest of you, ****ty operators on the bands.

SC



Geez, re-reading, That was silly of me to say that.

I forgot you people like hearing Lids on HF.

SC


  #6   Report Post  
Old November 18th 06, 02:52 AM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 65
Default "Stupid is as stupid does."

"Stupid is as stupid does."


  #7   Report Post  
Old November 18th 06, 03:34 AM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 65
Default "Stupid is as stupid does."

"Stupid is as stupid does."


  #8   Report Post  
Old November 18th 06, 03:57 AM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 65
Default Dingbat replies



"Stupid is as stupid does."

you said that and it is that you are stupid


Lurking....


  #9   Report Post  
Old November 18th 06, 04:29 AM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 62
Default "Stupid is as stupid does."

"Stupid is as stupid does."
"Not Steve" anon@anon wrote in message ...


I agree. This is true of all cross-posters who don't have a clue as to what
or where they are trolling.

Forrest


  #10   Report Post  
Old November 19th 06, 12:25 AM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default "Stupid is as stupid does."

"Jack Ricci" wrote in
:

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!




There, I shortened your post for you.

SC
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. Slow Code Policy 189 December 14th 06 10:46 AM
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs? Slow Code Policy 212 November 7th 06 11:34 PM
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs? Slow Code General 144 November 3rd 06 12:55 AM
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC Brian Policy 3 October 24th 03 12:02 AM
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications Hania Lux Equipment 0 October 22nd 03 07:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017