| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
November 16th 06, 12:29 AM
posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
A non renewable no-code license is a good idea.
It provides an incentive to keeping studying and building radio skills so
you can graduate to a more permanent higher class license. Those that fail to upgrade, no loss, we don't need them anyway. We want quality operators. If you want quantity, go to CB. SC |
|
#2
November 16th 06, 02:00 AM
posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
A non renewable no-code license is a good idea.
It's irrelevant. The code requirement is going away soon. Then what will
you bitch about? "Slow Code" wrote in message ink.net... It provides an incentive to keeping studying and building radio skills so you can graduate to a more permanent higher class license. Those that fail to upgrade, no loss, we don't need them anyway. We want quality operators. If you want quantity, go to CB. SC |
|
#3
November 17th 06, 12:55 AM
posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
A non renewable no-code license is a good idea.
"DougSlug" wrote in
: It's irrelevant. The code requirement is going away soon. Then what will you bitch about? The same thing as the rest of you, ****ty operators on the bands. SC |
|
#4
November 17th 06, 01:36 AM
posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
A non renewable no-code license is a good idea.
"Slow Code" wrote in message ink.net... "DougSlug" wrote in : It's irrelevant. The code requirement is going away soon. Then what will you bitch about? The same thing as the rest of you, ****ty operators on the bands. SC But there will be more OO's, so you'll soon have your license revoked. Aw ****, it is already, isn't it? |
|
#5
November 18th 06, 01:20 AM
posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
A non renewable no-code license is a good idea.
Slow Code wrote in
ink.net: "DougSlug" wrote in : It's irrelevant. The code requirement is going away soon. Then what will you bitch about? The same thing as the rest of you, ****ty operators on the bands. SC Geez, re-reading, That was silly of me to say that. I forgot you people like hearing Lids on HF. SC |
|
#6
November 18th 06, 02:52 AM
posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Stupid is as stupid does."
"Stupid is as stupid does."
|
|
#7
November 18th 06, 03:34 AM
posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Stupid is as stupid does."
"Stupid is as stupid does."
|
|
#8
November 18th 06, 03:57 AM
posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dingbat replies
"Stupid is as stupid does." you said that and it is that you are stupid Lurking.... |
|
#9
November 18th 06, 04:29 AM
posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Stupid is as stupid does."
"Stupid is as stupid does."
"Not Steve" anon@anon wrote in message ... I agree. This is true of all cross-posters who don't have a clue as to what or where they are trolling. Forrest |
|
#10
November 19th 06, 12:25 AM
posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Stupid is as stupid does."
"Jack Ricci" wrote in
: Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa! There, I shortened your post for you. SC |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. | Policy | |||
| What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs? | Policy | |||
| What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs? | General | |||
| My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
| Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
Linear Mode
