On Dec 16, 9:51*am, "Frank Arthur" wrote:
You are the joke "radioguy" .
The Burger King sign says "no videorecording or *photography allowed".

It doesn't say yo cn't have a camera or camcorder. It says you cannot
take photographs or video recording. What's your problem?
Either don't go to Burger King r if you go follow their rules.


IThat is not as easy as you make it sound. I would like to see you
keep on uninstalling and reinstalling safety lights on your car
everytime you
enter and leave Burger King property.

It's at least a two hour job one way.

Who in their right mind is going to spend two or mor hours
uninstalling safety lights right before entering BK property and then
another two hours
or more reinstalling them after leaving BK property just to have lunch
there for half an hour or less???

Not only that, but you will most likely get arrested if you do so,
since you will be blocking traffic on the public streets for hours at
a time while uninstalling them right outside of Burger King prroperty.

And of you reinstall them while on BK property before leaving so you
won't block traffic, the BK managers and employees will woner what
you're doing there fo so long and will say something to you anout it.

So again, what right does Burger Kimg have to say SAFETY LIGHTS
intalled on your car are illegal since it violates Burger King's own
rules about
"no photography".

When there's nothing in actual local city, county or state laws saying
that SAFETY LIGHTS made specifically to be installed on a car are
against the
law to intall in you car???

They're sold specifically to be installed on your car in order to
protect kids more and pets and other peoples' property.

On Dec 16, 9:51*am, "Frank Arthur" wrote:
You are the joke "radioguy" .
The Burger King sign says "no videorecording or *photography allowed".

It doesn't say yo cn't have a camera or camcorder. It says you cannot
take photographs or video recording. What's your problem?
Either don't go to Burger King r if you go follow their rules.



You may be right. That might be a loophole. It's obvious that Burger
King's intentions, for whatever reason, is so that there won't be any
photographs or videorecordings of their employees.

The SAFETY LIGHTS don't actually take "photographs" and don't do any
"videorecoring" but they DO transmit live motion pictures in realtime
which CAN be videorecorded by other people in their own homes.

Which either photographic stills can be made from or can be left as a
videorecording.

And a car with safety lights instaled doesn't even have to be on BK
property for such a transmission/videorecording of BK employees to be
made.

If the employees are outdside, it will most likely see them. If
they're inside, well a lot of BK is window glass.

However as I said, whle inside a BK restaurant, a BK manager already
thought that my radio, complete with headphones, was a "camera" and
told
me it wasn't allowed in there since "cameras aren't allowed in here".

It is very obvious to me that I was not taking any pictures with a
RADIO that was capable of recieving only, radio and tv signals.

And it's not just BK. Some other restaurants and some other places are
doing the same thing with a "no cameras allowed" rule or a "n
phoyography allowed" rule.

Huh? You mean the restaurant doesn't own the property? I think they
do, and they have the right to say no video recording on their
property. Now if you want to step out to the side walk, which is
public property and photograph, then you can take all the pictures you
want. And by the way, you can't "do anything you want" on public
property.

Okay. It should be said that when I first saw the safety back up
lights for sale in the store, Burger King did not yet have any signs
up prohibiting
photography or videorecording.

They added that sign months after (maybe even years after) I first saw
the safety back up lights for sale in the store.

So once againb, what right do they have to tell me that I have to
spend hours taking the safety backup lights off of my car and run a
higher risk of
running over innocen little kids just because it's against Burger
King's own rules and illegal according to Burger King's own rules.

They are NOT the Department of Transportation. They are NOT the police
department. They are NOT the Bureau of Motor Vehicles.


I don't see what back up lights and video recording have in common as
the original poster was complaining about.

Again, the safety backup lights I seen for sale in the store transmits
full motion video pictures which anyone in their own homes can pick up
and
videorecord from their own home.

Cars with these safety backup lights on them don't even need to be on
BK property to pick up certain BK employees and their actions.

And a bunch of other people sitting at their own homes are able to
make videorecordings of these transmissions of BK employees and their
actions.

And all the while, none of the BK employees or managers have any idea
that they were ever videorecorded by anyone at all.

hahahahahaha.

"Albert Worschey" wrote in message
...
On Dec 16, 2:21 am, radioguy wrote:
This might sound like a joke, but it isn't.

You know those back up safety lights they sell to install in and on
your car that uses the frequencies in the
ham bands?

However, Burger King has signs up saying "no videorecording or
photography allowed" and that "violators will be
prosecuted".

So with that sign, Burger King is telling all of us that it is against
the law to BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH

Remove the signs. It's your public property, too.

Hell Yes!! Al is so frigging right.
Its like Burger King thinks they are Private property HA HA HA HA HA HA
cough ,cough , hack, ptooey

"radioguy" wrote in message
...
On Dec 16, 9:51 am, "Frank Arthur" wrote:
You are the joke "radioguy" .
The Burger King sign says "no videorecording or photography allowed".

It doesn't say yo cn't have a camera or camcorder. It says you cannot
take photographs or video recording. What's your problem?
Either don't go to Burger King r if you go follow their rules.


IThat is not as easy as you make it sound. I would like to see you
keep on uninstalling and reinstalling safety lights on your car
everytime you
enter and leave Burger King property.

It's at least a two hour job one way.

Who in their right mind is going to spend two or mor hours
uninstalling safety lights right before entering BK property and then
another two hours
or more reinstalling them after leaving BK property just to have lunch
there for half an hour or less???

Not only that, but you will most likely get arrested if you do so,
since you will be blocking traffic on the public streets for hours at
a time while uninstalling them right outside of Burger King prroperty.

And of you reinstall them while on BK property before leaving so you
won't block traffic, the BK managers and employees will woner what
you're doing there fo so long and will say something to you anout it.

So again, what right does Burger Kimg have to say SAFETY LIGHTS
intalled on your car are illegal since it violates Burger King's own
rules about
"no photography".

When there's nothing in actual local city, county or state laws saying
that SAFETY LIGHTS made specifically to be installed on a car are
against the
law to intall in you car???

They're sold specifically to be installed on your car in order to
protect kids more and pets and other peoples' property.

You and Jerry should hook up.
you would make a great wingman. Imagine riding shotgun in the Sauk
mobile.

As Jerry would say " you ****in assholes, stop with the cross posting"

On Dec 16, 11:08*pm, "Mike" wrote:

Hell Yes!! *Al is so frigging right.
* Its like Burger King thinks they are Private property *HA HA HA HA HA HA
cough ,cough , hack, ptooey

Not only that, Burger King food sucks! Wendy's makes a FAR BETTER
hamburger and it's cheaper too!

radioguy wrote in news:37b04fdc-4522-4afa-ac2f-
:

Huh? You mean the restaurant doesn't own the property? I think they
do, and they have the right to say no video recording on their
property. Now if you want to step out to the side walk, which is
public property and photograph, then you can take all the pictures you
want. And by the way, you can't "do anything you want" on public
property.

So what is Burger King hiding? Why woud they care?

"807breath" wrote in message
...
On Dec 16, 11:08 pm, "Mike" wrote:

Hell Yes!! Al is so frigging right.
Its like Burger King thinks they are Private property HA HA HA HA HA HA
cough ,cough , hack, ptooey

Not only that, Burger King food sucks! Wendy's makes a FAR BETTER
hamburger and it's cheaper too!

Make sure toi get a double because the single's the veggies are too cold.

On Dec 16, 10:18 pm, 807breath wrote:
On Dec 16, 11:08 pm, "Mike" wrote:

Hell Yes!! Al is so frigging right.
Its like Burger King thinks they are Private property HA HA HA HA HA HA
cough ,cough , hack, ptooey

Not only that, Burger King food sucks! Wendy's makes a FAR BETTER
hamburger and it's cheaper too!

Wendy's makes the worst hamburger in the world.

"cmdr buzz corey" wrote in message
...
On Dec 16, 10:18 pm, 807breath wrote:
On Dec 16, 11:08 pm, "Mike" wrote:

Hell Yes!! Al is so frigging right.
Its like Burger King thinks they are Private property HA HA HA HA
HA HA
cough ,cough , hack, ptooey

Not only that, Burger King food sucks! Wendy's makes a FAR BETTER
hamburger and it's cheaper too!

Wendy's makes the worst hamburger in the world.

Wendy's uses the highest quolity meat then the other place's, but as far as
actual taste goes it's hard to beat McDonald's.