Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 19:04:12 GMT, J.C. Jones wrote:
Because something needs to be done about these obnoxious, smelly, fat, out of shape & horrifically boring scanner listeners. They are the ruination of good, decent communications enthusiasts with their constant "can you top what I heard" attitude & downright illegal actions. Plus, they are taking up more than their fair share of blue jean material with their massive 48-60 " waistlines and 28 " strides. It's time someone put their foot down and that foot is me! J.C. Jones TROLL-O-METER 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 / / / / / / / Troll-O-Meter Reading Pity you can't do any better than a mere 7 on the troll-o-meter, Jonesie, old boy. Do try harder next time, okay? 73 DE John, KC2HMZ Tonawanda, New York |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Radio Amateur KC2HMZ wrote in
: Pity you can't do any better than a mere 7 on the troll-o-meter, Jonesie, old boy. Do try harder next time, okay? 7!!! Me thinks your rating system needs revision, 3 is probably the best this person rates. The best he can do is scanner listeners look and smell funny and a lame assed attempted at mocking simple oneupmanship. How many hobby groups don't engage in those types of conversations? Last time I checked sharing experiences was an intergal part of any hobby. This one needs to do some serious research on how to troll.... -- You are a fluke of the Universe You have no right to be here And whether you can hear it or not, the Universe is laughing behind your back |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I measured my waist at 58", but my stride is 28 1/2". For a minute, I
thought you might have included me and I was about to get apathetic... J.C. Jones wrote in message s.com... On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:43:02 -0400, "w4jle" W4JLE(remove this to wrote: And you graced us with your observations because? J.C. Jones wrote in message ws.com... The average scanner listener from years of observation...sorry if this offends. --- Because something needs to be done about these obnoxious, smelly, fat, out of shape & horrifically boring scanner listeners. They are the ruination of good, decent communications enthusiasts with their constant "can you top what I heard" attitude & downright illegal actions. Plus, they are taking up more than their fair share of blue jean material with their massive 48-60 " waistlines and 28 " strides. It's time someone put their foot down and that foot is me! J.C. Jones |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 21:37:44 GMT, Lord Floyd in rec.radio.scanner - :
Radio Amateur KC2HMZ wrote in : Pity you can't do any better than a mere 7 on the troll-o-meter, Jonesie, old boy. Do try harder next time, okay? 7!!! Me thinks your rating system needs revision, 3 is probably the best this person rates. The best he can do is scanner listeners look and smell funny and a lame assed attempted at mocking simple oneupmanship. How many hobby groups don't engage in those types of conversations? Last time I checked sharing experiences was an intergal part of any hobby. This one needs to do some serious research on how to troll.... Judging by the number of replies, I'd say he did OK. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article m, J.C. Jones
writes: Radios clipped all over him, and he doesn't know when to turn them off. The seat on his bluejeans hanging almost to the ground. Doesn't use deodorant because "I have a reaction to it". As digusting a sight as you'll ever see or smell. J.C. Jones Surely, you must have mistaken scanner listeners for ham radio operators. |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
J.C. Jones wrote in news:78dbaa8d64e41b7044e282066ca8cad6
@news.teranews.com: Other than troll bait, I am somewhat amused and somewhat offended. Sans the recreational use of scanners and your depiction of those that use them, how would we describe the average non-scanner user? The non-scanner user never has to worry about carrying his/her body to various sites where the scanner may offer enhancements. I attended the Railfest recently in Altoona PA, scanners abounded. Problem is that to a degree, your description was accurate of some of the people that I observed with scanners that day. Others looked and were quite educated. Most have an enhanced knowledge of technology that accompanies the hobby, the ordinary non-scanner user doesn't know what a Mega Hertz is, likely attributing it to a significant pain. Look at HAMS, some also fit into your category, but they have greatly enhanced technical skills. The real American physique comes from years of dedicated and incessant changing of television channels, masterfully wielding the remote, bodies toned by endless journeys to the refrigerator and toilet. Mind numbing, pre-conceived ideas promoting whatever the current trend in political correctness has determined that we need inculcation in. Never mind the spontaneity of the scanner, the pathos of life, the humor of misunderstood and misquoted communications, the true awareness of the crime in your neighborhood. Once, the dispatcher told the police to be on the lookout (BOLO) for a car and she described it as having "tinted wendells". An officer called in and asked, seemingly for clarification, if the car had "tinted wendells", and in the background you could hear the guffaw of the other officer in the car, obviously in disbelief that his partner repeated the misquotation verbatim. Or the other day, a woman at a local Hairstylist, was apparently having an anger fit, likely about how her hair looked. Oddly enough, the Shop was called "Tantrum Tanning". How the dispatcher kept a straight face is beyond me. Anyway, the officer said "in other words, there is a woman having a tantrum at Tantrum". The dispatcher responded that was correct, and said that she had also thought of that, she kind of chuckled. See, no laugh track for the mind numbed American. No one told these people when to laugh, no ability to rewind to hear it again. See this page for the verification of the existence of the "Tantrum Tanning Salon" http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/trib.../fashionfyi/s_ 97183.html I like the scanner dweeb comics, but was unable to find an online page with examples of them. If I were or am in the category of scanner dweeb, so be it, there's a lot more degrading things to be associated with. Regards. The average scanner listener from years of observation...sorry if this offends. 5' 71/2" 320 lbs 48" waist 28" stride Highschool (the MIT of scanner listeners) nicknames: Frumpy Pudgey Dumpy Stinkpot Stinky Smelly The Round Mound of Artificial Ground Radios clipped all over him, and he doesn't know when to turn them off. The seat on his bluejeans hanging almost to the ground. Doesn't use deodorant because "I have a reaction to it". As digusting a sight as you'll ever see or smell. J.C. Jones -- Never say never. Nothing is absolute. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: scanner stuff | Scanner | |||
power output formula | Homebrew | |||
FS: scanner stuff | Scanner | |||
Taking Back the Group - Scanner Listener Helps Bust the Bad Guy | Scanner | |||
Taking Back the Group - Evidence found by Scanner Listener | Scanner |