Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
Old October 2nd 03, 01:37 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 17:05:38 -0400, GeorgeF in rec.radio.scanner -
om :



wrote:


Well, considering McDonalds isn't set up for paper & pen transactions I would
say that is understandable. How does your ebay business do when your computer
takes a ****?


I do very well because I still (and always will) do a consider amount of
business and sales via more traditional marketing means such as mail and
newspaper/magzine advertising.

George
http://www.MilAirComms.com
http://www.AuctionWholesaler.com (since edna so badly wants to bring it up)


Blah blah blah, that is all we ever hear from you.

LMAO@U HAhaHAAHAH

"At Your Request We Can Drop-Ship Your Orders!


Only a Limited Number of Dealerships Available, SignUp Today!
Normally we charge $34.99 however for a short time we're offering our Dealer Startup Package for only $19.99!
You Must Act NOW To Get This Special Price.



Start-Up Fee On Sale for $19.99
ITEM #: DEALERPACK-AW"


Haw haw haw, sell alot of them there grandfather clocks on ebay?
Only $20 to join your program. I'd be surprised if you have even sold
the first 'dealership".
You are a joke little man. Thanks for the laugh!




  #22   Report Post  
Old October 2nd 03, 01:43 AM
CW
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So you're a snail mail spammer. An honorable profession. Right up there with
lawyers.


"GeorgeF" wrote in message
news:3F7B41A2.3010502@licensed4funREMOVEBEFOREFLIG HT.com...



I do very well because I still (and always will) do a consider amount of
business and sales via more traditional marketing means such as mail and
newspaper/magzine advertising.

George
http://www.MilAirComms.com
http://www.AuctionWholesaler.com (since edna so badly wants to bring it

up)



  #23   Report Post  
Old October 2nd 03, 01:56 AM
Frank
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dee D. Flint ...

^ "Frank" news:01c3873d$fff5f5d0$0125250a@preimuffyaouanyy.. .
^ So am I still correct that the advantages of CW a
^ - Narrower bandwidth....
^ - Greater effective range.
^ - Less equipment than other data types, which also
^ have greater bandwidth.
^ - Can be used without a microphone and without a key....

^ Some of the other digital modes are narrower but as you
^ state, you need more hardware such as a computer.

That surprises me.

Frank

  #24   Report Post  
Old October 2nd 03, 03:27 AM
Clint
 
Posts: n/a
Default



So what? If all these countires jumped off bridges would that mean we
would be nuts for not jump too?


Spurious analogy.
There is no correlation between the subject of morse code testing
and suicide.



Oh I hope not, I hope the USA never joins the rest of the world. We
don't need a 80, 40, 20, and 15 meter CB bands.


(1) what will you say after 6 months or a year, and the nations you
listed have seen no such degredation in band quality after dropping
the code requirement?

(2) the majority of hams making ham radio code violations on the
HF bands are hams that have had the morse code testing, high
speed testing at that as they are older hams that were tested many
many years ago.

(3) with the rest of the world dropping it, do you really think that
the ham community, with it's growing number of members itching
to ditch the code, WON'T start increasing pressure to the breaking
point to finally ditch the irrelavent and outdated code test
requirement?

The tide's pretty much against you.

God forbid that we have
something happen here far worse than 9/11 which renders Voice
communications useless and we need to go back to basices.


Ah, but the liberals are saying that no such thing will ever happen, that
the REAL threat is the republicans decreasing civil liberty and
crushing freedom here and that terrorism isn't a real threat.

Are you saying they are *wrong*?

Clint


  #25   Report Post  
Old October 2nd 03, 03:29 AM
Clint
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
.com...


Pretty close. Some of the other digital modes are narrower but as you
state, you need more hardware such as a computer. In addition each of the
other digital modes has its own unique set of advantages and disadvantages
in on air operation.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


All good reasons to preform morse code voluntarily.

It's just that it no longer needs to be forced down people's throats
*involuntarily*

Clint
KB5ZHT

--

--

Get in touch with your soul: www.glennbeck.com
OR, if you're a liberal, maybe you can FIND one


--




  #26   Report Post  
Old October 2nd 03, 10:56 AM
Frank
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Clint ...

^ (1) what will you say after 6 months or a year, and the
^ nations you listed have seen no such degredation in band
^ quality after dropping the code requirement?

What is their population compared to the U.S.? Do those other countries have
the trouble on the 11 meter band that the U.S. has?

If the code requirement is unnecessary then what about the electronics
knowledge requirement? Is it necessary to know how a transistor functions in
order to operate a two-meter radio? Should we also drop that from testing?
Should the exam be nothing more than a test of the FCC rules? Can you come up
with reasons to drop that also? Someone will, eventually, if we continue to
drop knowledge and ability requirements.


Clint ...
^ It's just that it no longer needs to be forced down
^ people's throats *involuntarily*

But it isn't forced and it isn't involuntary. An Amateur license is something
that is voluntarily sought.

Frank

  #27   Report Post  
Old October 2nd 03, 01:26 PM
Dee D. Flint
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Frank" wrote in message
news:01c3887f$f653d860$0125250a@kqncdrpzwptsjceo.. .
Dee D. Flint ...

^ "Frank" news:01c3873d$fff5f5d0$0125250a@preimuffyaouanyy.. .
^ So am I still correct that the advantages of CW a
^ - Narrower bandwidth....
^ - Greater effective range.
^ - Less equipment than other data types, which also
^ have greater bandwidth.
^ - Can be used without a microphone and without a key....

^ Some of the other digital modes are narrower but as you
^ state, you need more hardware such as a computer.

That surprises me.

Frank


Well PSK31 is narrower than morse code but the problem with it (according to
our local PSK31 guru) is that because it is narrower, it is hard to find the
PSK31 signals unless you know exactly where to look. I.e. just dialing
around, you easily zoom right past them without ever knowing they are there.
For that reason, I believe they have established calling frequencies in each
band so they can find each other. Plus they use some type of software to
scan and show peaks. I'm not into myself but we have several in the local
club who are.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

  #28   Report Post  
Old October 2nd 03, 05:38 PM
w4jle
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Edna, you seem to delight in attacking George, a person who has done more
for the scanner hobby than 99% of the folks on here.

What have you done except drop in your vitriolic comments in a "drive by" of
words.

Get a life, and come back when you have contributed something positive to
the hobby!

wrote in message
...

Blah blah blah, that is all we ever hear from you.



  #29   Report Post  
Old October 3rd 03, 01:47 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 12:38:24 -0400, "w4jle" W4JLE(remove this to in rec.radio.scanner - :

Edna, you seem to delight in attacking George, a person who has done more
for the scanner hobby than 99% of the folks on here.

LOL, I see how he helps here. You a big milair fan are ya?

What have you done except drop in your vitriolic comments in a "drive by" of
words.

Made you mad?

Get a life, and come back when you have contributed something positive to
the hobby!


Will do!


wrote in message
.. .

Blah blah blah, that is all we ever hear from you.



  #30   Report Post  
Old October 3rd 03, 02:14 AM
Frank
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dee D. Flint ...

^ Well PSK31 is narrower than morse code but the problem with
^ it ... is that because it is narrower, it is hard to find the
^ PSK31 signals unless you know exactly where to look.

I didn't know that the bandwidth was narrower but I have discovered that the
signals are hard to find. So is RTTY for me; but then I'm new at this.

This thread is in too many groups and I only read one of them so I'm backing
out of the discussion.

Thanks to you and the others who have provided informative replies.

Frank

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TRADE SX73!!! Mark Oppat Boatanchors 0 November 17th 04 02:54 AM
TRADE SX73!!! Mark Oppat Boatanchors 0 November 17th 04 02:54 AM
WWII radios for trade Ian Riden Boatanchors 0 June 7th 04 08:48 PM
Sell Or Trade BC3000XLT DeWayne Scanner 1 September 18th 03 11:05 PM
4-1000A amps for TRADE, pickup near Denver, CO M Dittmar Boatanchors 0 July 12th 03 11:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017