Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.radio.scanner byrnefm wrote:
: Thank you both for your replies! I was very interested hearing how it : compared with the other models you both mentioned of. I guess I was a : bit optimistic in how sensitive the frequency scanner is. Still, : every frequency found is one less to search randomly for... Another opionion ... remember that there are *hundreds* of radio signals out there at any one time! AM/FM broadcast stations, TV stations, shortwave radios stations .. and the list goes on .. a frequency counter has to "find" a signal that is significantly stronger than all those 'random' frequencies so that it can lock on and give you a readout. If you are tryng to find a feq of a radio that is low powered to begin with, then you'll need to get really close for that to happen. Richard in Boston, MA, USA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade | Homebrew | |||
North-Central Florida Mil Logs 9/10/2003 & 9/11/2003 | Scanner | |||
North-Central Florida Mil Logs 9/3/2003 | Scanner | |||
How is a frequency counter used? | Scanner |