Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
I'm thinking about purchasing a new scanner. The one I have now is a handheld, probably about 8 years old, Radio Shack 200 channels, 1.3GHz, Hyperscan Pro-26 with an antenna bought separately (RH77CA Diamond). I would prefer a desktop scanner that will scan around 400 channels or possibly more. I would be willing to spend around $300 or so. (snip) If you're looking to really improve your scanning capabilities, perhaps you should be looking at multiple scanners instead. With a single scanner, your returns diminish at some point as the number of memory channels increase. This is caused by two factors. First, in general, the greater the number of memory channels in a single scanner, the longer it takes to scan those channels, meaning each channel is scanned less often over a given period. Second, whenever a scanner locks onto a busy channel, you always miss what is happening on the other memory channels. With a greater number of memory channels, your scanner will find busy channels more often. But, as the scanner locks onto those channels more often, you miss more on the other memory channels. More advanced scanner enthusiasts solve these problems by simply using more than one scanner, each focused on a specific range of frequencies. This allows any one scanner to lock on a busy channel while the other scanners still scan, insuring the user doesn't miss as much while listening to any one channel. Simple scanners are fairly inexpensive. For example, to focus on the aircraft frequencies, a twenty or thirty channel scanner will often do nicely. If you're a real real aircraft band enthusiast, you may want two or three of these. With a separate scanner for this band, you'll be less likely to miss anything interesting on this band while listening to the police frequencies. You could do the same for any specific group of frequencies you want to scan intensively, leaving your main scanner to cover the frequencies not covered by the dedicated scanners. Of course, that main scanner should be the very best for those times when you want to hunt down the really rare stuff. Just something for you to think about. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pro-95 Scanner | Scanner | |||
Need advice on Digital Scanner | Scanner | |||
Coax signal deteriotion to Scanner | Scanner | |||
FS: scanner stuff | Scanner | |||
Scanner advice needed please (UK) | Scanner |