Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"BDK" wrote in message
... A ground plane made with an SO-239 connector and some coat hangers will blow a discone away. A total waste of money, unless you want it as a back up antenna to transmit on.... BDK A ground plane antenna, though, will limit the useful range of frequencies, won't it? I agree that it could outperform a discone at (and around) its resonant frequency, but for wideband scanning purposes, how could it outperform an antenna better optimized for wideband use like a discone? Like Donald K, I have had very good experiences with a discone. It even worked well for HF listening with compact wideband receivers that overload easily with wire antennas. On the other hand, if one needs a band-specific antenna, a ground plane would be easier and certainly cheaper. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have one of these, and while I'm not expert, it does a wonderful job for
me. I've never used a discone, so I have no way to compare the two... However, you can buy this antenna from other sources for HALF (or a little more than half) the price they want at the site that was originally linked to... http://www.starkelectronic.com/acantena.htm#ST2 http://www.valcoelectronics.com/scanner/scanner.htm http://www.radiooutfitter.com/store/ST2.html http://www.warrenelectronics.com/antennas/scanner_1.htm http://www.universal-radio.com/catal...ants/2732.html "BDK" wrote in message ... In article ers.com, says... I need some help choosing an antenna for my base station police scanner. any suggestion (pros or cons) would be appreciated This is what you want. Will blow away about any other omni antenna out there. Light years ahead of a discone. http://users.cis.net/kingpop/Scanner/Scantenna.htm BDK |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Too bad the ST-2 omits the milair freqs :~( I almost ordered one till I
read a DETAILED frequency coverage (30-50, 148-174, 440-470, 470-512, 800-912 MHz) Most stores list it as 30-1300 which isn't quite the same... "PowerHouse Communications" wrote in message ... I have one of these, and while I'm not expert, it does a wonderful job for me. I've never used a discone, so I have no way to compare the two... However, you can buy this antenna from other sources for HALF (or a little more than half) the price they want at the site that was originally linked to... http://www.starkelectronic.com/acantena.htm#ST2 http://www.valcoelectronics.com/scanner/scanner.htm http://www.radiooutfitter.com/store/ST2.html http://www.warrenelectronics.com/antennas/scanner_1.htm http://www.universal-radio.com/catal...ants/2732.html "BDK" wrote in message ... In article ers.com, says... I need some help choosing an antenna for my base station police scanner. any suggestion (pros or cons) would be appreciated This is what you want. Will blow away about any other omni antenna out there. Light years ahead of a discone. http://users.cis.net/kingpop/Scanner/Scantenna.htm BDK |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() This is what you want. Will blow away about any other omni antenna out there. Light years ahead of a discone. http://users.cis.net/kingpop/Scanner/Scantenna.htm BDK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Not quite light years ahead of a discone. Last year I put up a discone on one side of my house and a ST 2 on the other side, fed them both with RG 6U double shielded. Had them feeding a Yaesu VR 5000 alternately. The discone was the one that had the vertical element on top. On 30-50 I could tell no difference between the 2. But I could use the discone on 6 meter fm with a 1.9-1 swr. on 148-170 they appeared to be the same. On some freqs the ST 2 was a tad, and I mean a tad better. ON other signals in VHF (i.e.144mhz ssb amateur) the discone picked up distant ssb chatter while the ST 2 picked up nothing. On the discone I can use on 2 mtr. fm with almost a flat swr. On 440-470 they apeared to be the same for all intent. Although I can use the discone on 440 fm with a 1.5-1 or so swr. On the 470-512 area there is nothing to listen to around here so thats a wash. But on 800-912mhz the discone worked quite well and is somewhat resonant there, while the ST 2 seemed to be about deaf in this area. If you live in an area that gets freezing rain and wind, even the new improved ST 2 will not last. Its too fragile. I have never had a discone come down. After my tests I took down the ST 2 and sold it, and still have up the discone. There is no substitute for being resonant at various points on a freq plot. The ST 2 basically fakes the radio as far as impededance with the 300 ohm transformer. It hardly blows the discone out of the water, like I hear so often. Advertising hype. Jeff |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
However it is half the price and includes the feed line and shipping.
It seems by the reports for monitoring the basics its a appropriate antenna Doug "Jeff" wrote in message news:U060d.158329$Fg5.72937@attbi_s53... This is what you want. Will blow away about any other omni antenna out there. Light years ahead of a discone. http://users.cis.net/kingpop/Scanner/Scantenna.htm BDK -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Not quite light years ahead of a discone. Last year I put up a discone on one side of my house and a ST 2 on the other side, fed them both with RG 6U double shielded. Had them feeding a Yaesu VR 5000 alternately. The discone was the one that had the vertical element on top. On 30-50 I could tell no difference between the 2. But I could use the discone on 6 meter fm with a 1.9-1 swr. on 148-170 they appeared to be the same. On some freqs the ST 2 was a tad, and I mean a tad better. ON other signals in VHF (i.e.144mhz ssb amateur) the discone picked up distant ssb chatter while the ST 2 picked up nothing. On the discone I can use on 2 mtr. fm with almost a flat swr. On 440-470 they apeared to be the same for all intent. Although I can use the discone on 440 fm with a 1.5-1 or so swr. On the 470-512 area there is nothing to listen to around here so thats a wash. But on 800-912mhz the discone worked quite well and is somewhat resonant there, while the ST 2 seemed to be about deaf in this area. If you live in an area that gets freezing rain and wind, even the new improved ST 2 will not last. Its too fragile. I have never had a discone come down. After my tests I took down the ST 2 and sold it, and still have up the discone. There is no substitute for being resonant at various points on a freq plot. The ST 2 basically fakes the radio as far as impededance with the 300 ohm transformer. It hardly blows the discone out of the water, like I hear so often. Advertising hype. Jeff |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article U060d.158329$Fg5.72937@attbi_s53, "Jeff" oldog@(nospam)
mchsi.com says... This is what you want. Will blow away about any other omni antenna out there. Light years ahead of a discone. http://users.cis.net/kingpop/Scanner/Scantenna.htm BDK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Not quite light years ahead of a discone. Last year I put up a discone on one side of my house and a ST 2 on the other side, fed them both with RG 6U double shielded. Had them feeding a Yaesu VR 5000 alternately. The discone was the one that had the vertical element on top. On 30-50 I could tell no difference between the 2. But I could use the discone on 6 meter fm with a 1.9-1 swr. on 148-170 they appeared to be the same. On some freqs the ST 2 was a tad, and I mean a tad better. ON other signals in VHF (i.e.144mhz ssb amateur) the discone picked up distant ssb chatter while the ST 2 picked up nothing. On the discone I can use on 2 mtr. fm with almost a flat swr. On 440-470 they apeared to be the same for all intent. Although I can use the discone on 440 fm with a 1.5-1 or so swr. On the 470-512 area there is nothing to listen to around here so thats a wash. But on 800-912mhz the discone worked quite well and is somewhat resonant there, while the ST 2 seemed to be about deaf in this area. If you live in an area that gets freezing rain and wind, even the new improved ST 2 will not last. Its too fragile. I have never had a discone come down. After my tests I took down the ST 2 and sold it, and still have up the discone. There is no substitute for being resonant at various points on a freq plot. The ST 2 basically fakes the radio as far as impededance with the 300 ohm transformer. It hardly blows the discone out of the water, like I hear so often. Advertising hype. Jeff I havent seen the heavier duty one in person, so I can't say for sure how strong it is, but a discone really truly blows as an antenna. A ringo ranger 2 works pretty well, better than any of the discones I have had on most freqs. I wonder if the Yaesu was hearing better on the discone because it was desensitizing. I had one here for a while, and it was a disaster, intermod and hash all over, and so I sold it to a friend who lives 20 miles from any really big town. Works good out there.. Right now I have two Scantennas in the attic, along with a discone and a home brew ground plane cut for 161 Mhz (trains), The discone is in the "sweet spot" in the attic (it was there first), and until I bought the first Scantenna, I thought it was ok. I even replaced the original coax on the discone with 9913 and it was a tiny bit better on 800, but wasn't anywhere else. I have the discone connected to my BC9000, as it's better on that antenna, since it seems most prone to losing it's cool due to a nearby TV station's huge signal. The Pro 2005 and 2006 on the scantennas will both easily beat the 9000 in every way but scan speed, on any antenna. If I had my choice as one single antenna to use, I would probably pick the home built ground plane (I can build one that will last forever), with the ringo a close second. The scantenna's next only due to it's fragility. I may build a HD one myself one of these days.. As far as impedance goes, it's pretty meaingless for receivers, loss is much more of a problem. I need to find a climber to change the coax on my ringo, and put up another discone as a backup to it, for 2M/440. I don't want to get ripped off for 300 bucks like I did 10 years ago, 25 of it was for coming over the border into my town. That 150 yards cost 4 times as much as the ground plane I made the day before cost me! BDK |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod | Scanner | |||
FS: Kenwood TMV7-A and Compet GP-9 base antenna | Equipment |