dx'tard wrote:

Use the very best 50 ohm coax you can afford.

bull****...

Volker Tonn wrote:

dx'tard wrote:

Use the very best 50 ohm coax you can afford.

bull****...

Well, in your previous post you stated that "You will hardly notice any loss..."

That implies that one WILL notice...

It's been my experience that the best thing to do would be to go with the best
50 ohm coax you can afford.

But heck, I've only been doing this darn radio stuff for a few months, so what
the hell do I know?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

dxAce schrieb:


Volker Tonn wrote:


dx'tard wrote:


Use the very best 50 ohm coax you can afford.

bull****...


Well, in your previous post you stated that "You will hardly notice any loss..."

That implies that one WILL notice...

Loser! You should quote correctly -not destroying the content- 'tard.
A 50 ohm AirComm-plus cable costs three times as much as a lowloss 75
ohm TV-cable with the same loss.
And it gives pretty much the same results -if not better- on a broadband
antenna like a discone on consumer grade VHF/UHF-receivers wich do not
have a straight 50-ohm impedance. In most cases it varies between 30 and
150 ohms depending on the frequency you are receiving. So there is a
good chance a 75 ohm cable works even better than a 50 ohm cable with
the same loss. In worst case you will have an impedance mismatch loss of
3dB, but in most cases you will have a 3dB win depending on the scanner
you are using and frequency you are receiving.
There are few scannists who would buy or can afford a 0,70 US$/ft cable
for a 100ft run. So a good (lowloss!) TV-cable is really worth a try.

Volker Tonn wrote:

dxAce schrieb:


Volker Tonn wrote:


dx'tard wrote:


Use the very best 50 ohm coax you can afford.

bull****...


Well, in your previous post you stated that "You will hardly notice any loss..."

That implies that one WILL notice...

Loser! You should quote correctly -not destroying the content- 'tard.
A 50 ohm AirComm-plus cable costs three times as much as a lowloss 75
ohm TV-cable with the same loss.
And it gives pretty much the same results -if not better- on a broadband
antenna like a discone on consumer grade VHF/UHF-receivers wich do not
have a straight 50-ohm impedance. In most cases it varies between 30 and
150 ohms depending on the frequency you are receiving. So there is a
good chance a 75 ohm cable works even better than a 50 ohm cable with
the same loss. In worst case you will have an impedance mismatch loss of
3dB, but in most cases you will have a 3dB win depending on the scanner
you are using and frequency you are receiving.
There are few scannists who would buy or can afford a 0,70 US$/ft cable
for a 100ft run. So a good (lowloss!) TV-cable is really worth a try.

Shove it, NAZI boy!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:38:37 -0400, dxAce wrote:



Volker Tonn wrote:

dxAce schrieb:


Volker Tonn wrote:


dx'tard wrote:


Use the very best 50 ohm coax you can afford.

bull****...


Well, in your previous post you stated that "You will hardly notice any loss..."

That implies that one WILL notice...

Loser! You should quote correctly -not destroying the content- 'tard.

[snip]


Shove it, NAZI boy!


Well *this* sure went downhill fast.

i agree that the radio shacks poor mans discone is a improvement over most
scanner antennas, however one needs to be aware that the radio shack discone
uses hollow elements , subject to easier breakage than the icom discone.
i just put up a Radio Shack Discone and a channel master 5094. there is very
little difference as one performs better on some freqs than the other, the
rat shack con is omni directional as i believe the 5094 is some what
directional ( just my opinion ) . the discone did receive aircraft ground
allot better than the Channel master. however on FM broadcast it was equal
to the channel Master if not a little worse. these are just some trial test
as i have not gone to great comparisons yet. i am using the discone as a ham
antenna at the moment, but will do more comparison later this week. the
receiver is a Icom PCR-1000.
Just be careful with the rat shack discone as it is fragile.





"asym" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:00:21 -0700, Trooperdude
wrote:

On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:41:27 -0400, "Brent"
wrote:

I have made up my mind to buy this antenna, but I have found a few
different
models and don't know which to get. I am using a BC796D scanner. This
will
be an outside antenna.


Diamond Discone

Minimum of 9913Flex cable for the coax

Get a GOOD quality coax and connectors like 9913Flex
as a minimum, LMR400 is preferable.

I have a Pro-2052 w/ about 70ft of RG58 going up into the attic to hit
an RS discone. Here's what I will say, is that even with the really
crummy cable, reception is much better than it was with the other
antennas I tried, along with their shorter, higher quality cable runs.

These other antennas (not counting the crummy telescopic it came with
of course) are both mobiles. The first was a glass mount that I
bought two of, one for the car and one inside mounted to a little
stand I made. Reception was "ok".

The second is their wideband dual loaded magnetic mount, which was
quite a bit better than the other one, but still not great.

The #1 rule is of course height.. there is no substitute for it. Even
with the 70ft run -- I didn't want to drill holes in my ceiling, so it
goes across the roof to a closet, in through the trapdoor, then into
the middle of the attic -- I pick up much more than I did with the
other antenna. Partly design -- the discone is just better than any
kind of whip, but also because of the height difference of about 10-15
feet (and lack of wiring to interfere).

I can hear the ground control at the local airport now, which I was
never able to pick up before, and that's with an estimated loss of
about 10dB from the RG58.

The better cabling is an option (I'm looking for a good deal on some
9913 myself) but makes much more of a difference at high frequencies
than at lower ones. Even "crappy" RG8 only has a loss of around 5db @
400mhz for a 100ft run. 5db is enough that you'd notice, but it's
about the smallest amount that you *could* notice.

This is all out the window if you ever intend to transmit over that
same antenna. Get the best cabling you can and keep the run as short
as possible.

-Allen

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:41:58 GMT, asym said
in rec.radio.scanner:

Obviously, height *and* good cable is the best. But if you're in a
situation where it's one or the other, go for height first, replace
the cable later if you can.

Or go for the height and use a good low noise preamp mounted right at
the antenna.

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 04:27:23 GMT, asym said
in rec.radio.scanner:

If your reciever sensitivity isn't up to snuff, then a lot of times it
doesn't matter how short or long your cable run is, or if it's high or
low quality.

All of them enter into it. A 30 element LPV with lossless cable,
feeding a receiver with a terrible noise figure, won't let you hear
very much.

BTW, the advantage of a discone is that it's a good match at just
about all the frequencies we're interested in. It's not much of an
antenna - it's more of a matching device between the end of the cable
and space.

Isn't that what an antenna is really all about anyway, any kind of
antenna?

That's *all* a discone is. Most antennas have some gain, even if it's
just the 3dbi of a dipole or ground plane.

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:56:08 +0200, Volker Tonn
said in rec.radio.scanner:

Al Klein schrieb:

3db is 50%, or one "S" unit - easy enough to notice. Actually, the
receiver capture ratio is the smallest amount you'll notice, so the
better the receiver, the smaller the change it takes to make a big
difference.

6 dB is the difference of one S-Unit.

Oops. It was late. You're correct, of course.

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 02:21:05 GMT, Al Klein wrote:

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:41:58 GMT, asym said
in rec.radio.scanner:

Obviously, height *and* good cable is the best. But if you're in a
situation where it's one or the other, go for height first, replace
the cable later if you can.

Or go for the height and use a good low noise preamp mounted right at
the antenna.

Yeah that's another good option as well.. a decent preamp can cost
quite a bit less than a long run of great cable like 9913 or 400..