Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Al Klein wrote:
It's not the program. Most radios have a high-pass filter in the audio so that you don't hear the CTCSS tone. No, most radios have a three-inch speaker that can't reproduce the CTCSS tone. If you plug a hi-fi speaker into most radios, you'll hear the CTCSS just fine. -- The state religion of the USA is atheism, as established by the courts. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() clifto wrote: Al Klein wrote: It's not the program. Most radios have a high-pass filter in the audio so that you don't hear the CTCSS tone. No, most radios have a three-inch speaker that can't reproduce the CTCSS tone. If you plug a hi-fi speaker into most radios, you'll hear the CTCSS just fine. No, don't think so. The CTCSS tones are 'sub-audible', that is, they are below the range that humans can hear. dxAce Michigan USA -- The state religion of the USA is atheism, as established by the courts. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() dx'tard wrote: No, don't think so. The CTCSS tones are 'sub-audible', that is, they are below the range that humans can hear. You are wrong. Not to say you are a lying. This is a list of commonly used PL/CTCSS tones (all in Hz): 67.0 69.3 71.9 74.4 77.0 79.7 82.5 85.4 88.5 91.5 94.8 97.4 100.0 103.5 107.2 110.9 114.8 118.8 123.0 127.3 131.8 136.5 141.3 146.2 151.4 156.7 162.2 167.9 173.8 179.9 186.2 192.8 203.5 206.5 210.7 218.1 225.7 229.1 233.6 241.8 250.3 254.1 You will see that they are very audible on a decent system. The only reason they are not audible on systems using this tones -and some others too- is, that they are using a high pass filter cutting all freqs below 300Hz or so. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Volker Tonn wrote: dx'tard wrote: No, don't think so. The CTCSS tones are 'sub-audible', that is, they are below the range that humans can hear. You are wrong. Not to say you are a lying. This is a list of commonly used PL/CTCSS tones (all in Hz): 67.0 69.3 71.9 74.4 77.0 79.7 82.5 85.4 88.5 91.5 94.8 97.4 100.0 103.5 107.2 110.9 114.8 118.8 123.0 127.3 131.8 136.5 141.3 146.2 151.4 156.7 162.2 167.9 173.8 179.9 186.2 192.8 203.5 206.5 210.7 218.1 225.7 229.1 233.6 241.8 250.3 254.1 You will see that they are very audible on a decent system. The only reason they are not audible on systems using this tones -and some others too- is, that they are using a high pass filter cutting all freqs below 300Hz or so. That is correct. So... plugging the radio into a better speaker will therefore not help... unless the high pass filter is disabled. dxAce Michigan USA |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() dx'tard wrote: That is correct. So... plugging the radio into a better speaker will therefore not help... unless the high pass filter is disabled. Most VHF/UHF receivers are not having a highpass filter going so high (300Hz) but only to about 55 Hz in Europe or 65 Hz in US because of the mains freqs. It's only the transceivers wich are using these tones having the freqs up to 300Hz blocked to the AF-stage. It's simple enough to tap the discriminator output on the RX-section of nearly any (T)RX. I have a handheld scanner provinding the CTCSS-tones just out of the headphone jack. The built-in speaker is too tiny to go below 150Hz. BTW the higher tones above 150Hz are not used very often. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Volker Tonn wrote: dx'tard wrote: That is correct. So... plugging the radio into a better speaker will therefore not help... unless the high pass filter is disabled. Most VHF/UHF receivers are not having a highpass filter going so high (300Hz) but only to about 55 Hz in Europe or 65 Hz in US because of the mains freqs. It's only the transceivers wich are using these tones having the freqs up to 300Hz blocked to the AF-stage. It's simple enough to tap the discriminator output on the RX-section of nearly any (T)RX. I have a handheld scanner provinding the CTCSS-tones just out of the headphone jack. The built-in speaker is too tiny to go below 150Hz. BTW the higher tones above 150Hz are not used very often. Thanks Deutsche'tard. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() dx'tard schrieb: Thanks Deutsche'tard. My pleasure. hugs and kisses |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
AWWWW little steavie doesn't like being called a tard?
dxAce wrote: Volker Tonn wrote: dx'tard wrote: That is correct. So... plugging the radio into a better speaker will therefore not help... unless the high pass filter is disabled. Most VHF/UHF receivers are not having a highpass filter going so high (300Hz) but only to about 55 Hz in Europe or 65 Hz in US because of the mains freqs. It's only the transceivers wich are using these tones having the freqs up to 300Hz blocked to the AF-stage. It's simple enough to tap the discriminator output on the RX-section of nearly any (T)RX. I have a handheld scanner provinding the CTCSS-tones just out of the headphone jack. The built-in speaker is too tiny to go below 150Hz. BTW the higher tones above 150Hz are not used very often. Thanks Deutsche'tard. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Major CTCSS Bug in the new BC898T | Scanner | |||
CTCSS question | Scanner | |||
WANTED: Uniden Scanner BC002 CTCSS Tone Board | Equipment | |||
Enbridge/Consumers CTCSS TONE | Scanner | |||
ctcss tone board | Scanner |