Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Volker Tonn wrote: dx'tard wrote: No, don't think so. The CTCSS tones are 'sub-audible', that is, they are below the range that humans can hear. You are wrong. Not to say you are a lying. This is a list of commonly used PL/CTCSS tones (all in Hz): 67.0 69.3 71.9 74.4 77.0 79.7 82.5 85.4 88.5 91.5 94.8 97.4 100.0 103.5 107.2 110.9 114.8 118.8 123.0 127.3 131.8 136.5 141.3 146.2 151.4 156.7 162.2 167.9 173.8 179.9 186.2 192.8 203.5 206.5 210.7 218.1 225.7 229.1 233.6 241.8 250.3 254.1 You will see that they are very audible on a decent system. The only reason they are not audible on systems using this tones -and some others too- is, that they are using a high pass filter cutting all freqs below 300Hz or so. That is correct. So... plugging the radio into a better speaker will therefore not help... unless the high pass filter is disabled. dxAce Michigan USA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Major CTCSS Bug in the new BC898T | Scanner | |||
CTCSS question | Scanner | |||
WANTED: Uniden Scanner BC002 CTCSS Tone Board | Equipment | |||
Enbridge/Consumers CTCSS TONE | Scanner | |||
ctcss tone board | Scanner |