| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#31
December 11th 04, 03:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Scott en Aztlán wrote:
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:52:10 -0500, wrote: Court: Mom's Eavesdropping Violated Law SEATTLE (AP) - In a victory for rebellious teenagers, the state Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a mother violated Washington's privacy law by eavesdropping on her daughter's phone conversation. Privacy advocates hailed the ruling, but the mother was unrepentant. "It's ridiculous! Kids have more rights than parents these days," said mom Carmen Dixon, 47. That *is* ridiculous. Mom pays for the phone, she pays for the computer, she pays for the electricity; she has the right to monitor the communication taking place using her property, just as an employer has the right to monitor employees' emails, phone calls, and even keystrokes. Minor children should have no expectation of privacy. ----------------- Legally wrong. What's next? --------------- The improved observance of the Rights of Children. Steve |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| VOODOO CB & ILLEGAL MODIFICATION BOOKS AT 40% OFF | CB | |||
| VOODOO CB & ILLEGAL MODIFICATION BOOKS AT 40% OFF | CB | |||
| very irronic: cell phone eavesdropping & old tv sets | Scanner | |||
| Freeband & Ham | CB | |||
Threaded Mode
