LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Report Post  
Old June 14th 05, 11:16 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 21:57:09 GMT, "Jim Hackett"
wrote:

That is a BIG difference.

"Wayne Howell" wrote in message
...
Christopher O'Callaghan wrote:
MICHEAL JACKSON CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES



Sorry......he was found Not Guilty---not Innocent.


Insofar as you are presumed to be innocent until proven
guilty, then being found not guilty equates to being found innocent.
Your view notwithstanding.

If you were to publicly proclaim him guilty (without clearly
expressing that it was the _opinion_ of yourself or others) in view
of the court's determination, you could well be successfully sued for
slander.

That's why the news media carefully use the term "allegedly"
in reference to presumed criminals all the way up to the moment of
conviction. They wish to avoid prosecution, generally in the case of
media, for libel.



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Of course Michael Jackson is innocent, what a stupid question: Nick Policy 22 June 15th 05 10:07 PM
Leland Scott Is Innocent Ruby Tuesday CB 0 March 9th 04 09:04 PM
Illegal CBers harass innocent people Robert The Bruce CB 13 February 1st 04 05:11 PM
Is Michael Jackson Innocent? Is KE4TEW a father of felons? YES Arf! Arf! Swap 2 November 24th 03 01:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017