Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . net,
Slow Code wrote: They think you shouldn't have to be proficient at anything to have a ham radio license. Nonsense. That's an illogical conclusion on your part, and _not_ something which has been stated, or can reasonably be inferred from the postings that I have seen in these threads. OK then, Since we all want to be proficient, how about this: snip exactly the same proposals SC has made before, concerning which he's stated that "99%" of the people on USENET "hate", and which contain positions even more radical than those which have already been rejected by the FCC. Trolling again, SC? Pity. If you were actually willing to engage in a productive discussion you might actually do some good, but I don't see any evidence of that. PLONK. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A question for nickle Generals and Extras. Would you renew your license? | Equipment | |||
A question for nickle Generals and Extras. Would you renew your license? | Policy | |||
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy |