| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've owned a couple BC9000-XLT's, and BC898T's over the years. I think
you'll be happier keeping the BC898T. Is UHF MilAir your main interest? That's what I was using the BC898T for, and I was very satisfied. Another consideration is that the BC9000-XLT does not have a computer interface for programming, and/or control. The BC9000-XLT also required an optional CTCSS module, that is almost impossible to find these days. Bill Crocker "n4aeq" wrote in message oups.com... Earlier this year i bought a BC898T, I wanted a good scanner/reciever for uhf. My pro2006 work great but i needed a vfo/tunning knob. The 898 works greatand is close but not quite as sensitive as the pro6000 in uhf. So sense i dont care about trunking im thinking of getting a used BC9000xlt. My question is this, would the 9000 be as sensitive as the pro2006 in uhf or will i notice any difference in sensitivity between the BC9000 & BC898t? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| HELP ( Please ) - BC898T | Scanner | |||
| BC898T - HELP - ( Please ) | General | |||
| BC898T SS Software Problem | Scanner | |||
| Major CTCSS Bug in the new BC898T | Scanner | |||
| FA: BC9000XLT w/extras, on eBay | Scanner | |||