Al Klein wrote:
On 26 Jul 2006 04:39:18 -0700,
wrote:

No, stupid, you are making excuses for your lack of education.

Wrong, you illiterate retard.

The only moonbouncing you are doing is your three chins on your daddy's
ass as you give him a blowjob.

So much for "education".
and that was posted by an extra class Ham AB8MQ AL

an old freind wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
On 26 Jul 2006 04:39:18 -0700,
wrote:

No, stupid, you are making excuses for your lack of education.

Wrong, you illiterate retard.

The only moonbouncing you are doing is your three chins on your daddy's
ass as you give him a blowjob.

So much for "education".
and that was posted by an extra class Ham AB8MQ AL

AB8MQ is Morkie's unrequited queer love interst, Al.

It's just another thing in this world that got "dumbed down".

I blame home computers and the internet. I'm not saying wether we are
better of worse off. That's just what I attribute it to.

John

I blame home computers and the internet.
"Eddie Munster" wrote in message
news:qoPxg.47800

I agree...But today's kids just don't have the aptitude or need for a
hobby that was once the only active hobby which instantly joined others
around the entire world with the same common interest on a technical level,
as well as a communications level, and a sense of accomplishment. There are
simply too many other high-tech hobbies to choose from today.

TV video games come to mind...Satellite TV and communications, cell
phones, FRS radio,XM radio, cheap long distance, DVDs, Ipods, etc., etc.,
etc., etc.


...


It's just another thing in this world that got "dumbed down".

I blame home computers and the internet. I'm not saying wether we are
better of worse off. That's just what I attribute it to.

John

AB8MQ is Morkie's unrequited queer love interst, Al.
wrote in message
ups.com...


WOW!!!
Who would have thought that the internet would soon become a vehicle for
High-Tech C.B. communication!
Good thing linears don't work on here!

Jack


an old freind wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
On 26 Jul 2006 04:39:18 -0700,
wrote:

No, stupid, you are making excuses for your lack of education.

Wrong, you illiterate retard.

The only moonbouncing you are doing is your three chins on your
daddy's
ass as you give him a blowjob.

So much for "education".
and that was posted by an extra class Ham AB8MQ AL

AB8MQ is Morkie's unrequited queer love interst, Al.

Jack Ricci wrote:
AB8MQ is Morkie's unrequited queer love interst, Al.
wrote in message
ups.com...


WOW!!!
Who would have thought that the internet would soon become a vehicle for
High-Tech C.B. communication!
Good thing linears don't work on here!

Jack
in point of fact they do

the method is different it can be observed by studing RRAP lately the
Linear (slptter box box design) work be the sender sending the same
sort of crap (so and so is rapist child moelstor so on) over and over
again till the target either gives up the net or is forced to repond
with something (in my case I have tried suggesting the jammer "get
help" now I am trying praying for him)

"J. D. B." wrote in
:

No Al, those are not arguments that take place with the model train
hobby. The best scale is what is best for you. Unlike ham radio, no one
tries to ram something down another hobbyist's throat. Same for buy vs.
build. Not a discussion. You do what you want to do and no one is
critical of the other. The way it should be in ham radio.

You were that kid on the playground that always thought you were better
than all the other kids and you tried to get other kids in fights didn't
you Al? You seem to be always looking for confrontation.



I think you're sniffing too much glue putting your model cho-cho
trains together.

Sc

Slow Code wrote:
"J. D. B." wrote in
:

No Al, those are not arguments that take place with the model train
hobby. The best scale is what is best for you. Unlike ham radio, no one
tries to ram something down another hobbyist's throat. Same for buy vs.
build. Not a discussion. You do what you want to do and no one is
critical of the other. The way it should be in ham radio.

You were that kid on the playground that always thought you were better
than all the other kids and you tried to get other kids in fights didn't
you Al? You seem to be always looking for confrontation.



I think you're sniffing too much glue putting your model cho-cho
trains together.
you think SC prove that assertion (that you think) t appears to be
flase

Sc

**** OFF ALREADY WITH HAM ****!

TAKE IT SOMEWHERE ELSE NOT HERE! AND BESIDE WHO GIVE **** ABOUT AMATEUR
RADIO ASSHOLES WHO THINK THEIR ALL STUCK UP AND THINK THEY RULE THE WORLD

an_old_friend wrote:
Slow Code wrote:

"J. D. B." wrote in
:


No Al, those are not arguments that take place with the model train
hobby. The best scale is what is best for you. Unlike ham radio, no one
tries to ram something down another hobbyist's throat. Same for buy vs.
build. Not a discussion. You do what you want to do and no one is
critical of the other. The way it should be in ham radio.

You were that kid on the playground that always thought you were better
than all the other kids and you tried to get other kids in fights didn't
you Al? You seem to be always looking for confrontation.



I think you're sniffing too much glue putting your model cho-cho
trains together.

you think SC prove that assertion (that you think) t appears to be
flase

Sc




---
avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0630-2, 07/26/2006
Tested on: 7/27/2006 2:41:02 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com





---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0630-2, 07/26/2006
Tested on: 7/27/2006 2:42:19 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com

You know, this is the attitude that has kept me from being a licensed ham
operator. I have DX'ed for years, but find most of the operators to be smug
asses who want to keep the hobby to themselves. I have no need to learn
code, or more importantly, no desire. So you old fossils keep your exclusive
little club and watch as it dies out with rotary telephones and vacuum
tubes. Every ham I have met in person has been secretive and not at all
willing to help anyone out. I sold a scope to one a few years back and in
our conversation asked a few questions about becoming a ham. He was not
willing to answer questions nor offer any advice, just for me to get an arrl
book. He wouldn't even tell me what the repeater frequencies were for the 2
meter in our area. So, lets make the passing score 98%, 50wpm, and renew all
classes every year. That ought to drive out the rest of 'em and keep you,
Mr. Slow Code, as the king of all hams, even if you have no subjects to
reign over.
Come to think of it, I can talk to people all over the world via internet,
send packets and slow scan tv, so why worry about propagation and antennae?
"Slow Code" wrote in message
nk.net...
Just thought you should know that.


Help save Ham radio and ignore Markie to save
usenet. Thanks


1- No more automatic renewals. Individuals must retest and pass all
elements required for their license class every ten years.


2- The passing score for written exams needs to be raised to 85%.


3- Code elements should be 13 wpm for General, and 20 wpm for Extra.


4- Make the no-code license one year non-renewable.


5- Cancel your ARRL membership until they decide to work to improve
things and stop them from proposing ham radio that is like CB.