![]() |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
Take up a decent hobby,like going fishing.
cuhulin |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
Jim Hackett wrote:
I thought chickens "clucked", not "bucked"... wrote in message ups.com... Rastis P. Buttsnort wrote: All that's happening is a simple case of "Rectification". You are hearing one or more AM broadcast stations. This is nothing new. Unless of course you really WANT to believe this is something it's not..... If this was rectification of AM stations, then why: - No music, advertising, or anything else shows up, but yet - Sometimes clear voices are heard saying vulgar words which would never be allowed on any AM station, and - Sometimes prophetic statements are made using my own name and the name of other witnesses present or deeply involved in the experiments, and - In one instance I heard what sounded like several loud chickens bocking at such a large volume it would've surely been heard at room volume (incidently, these loud "animal-like" sounds always appear toward the end of the recording, shortly before I hit "stop" - but yet there is no interference with the audio plug or movement by myself before stopping the recording, yet they are often a hallmark of the brief mostly 30-second recordings I do)? To one extreme I heard a death threat used against one of my co-workers. To the other I heard statements like "you did not work today" (which I hadn't) and "no mouse pad" (which I use none). Overall, if you count the digital recordings from the cemetery (where no white noise was present except for the internal components of the rather silent recorder), the house, and plugged directly into the back of the scanner, I've stored thousands of unexplained voices - and it would've been impossible for the scanner to pick up AM stations in the cemetery (and along with the fact that most all the voices sounded had thick country accents and sounded African-American in nature with poor grammar, I find the odds of this being rectification far-fetched). A group of friends and I were so intrigued with some of the voices from the cemetery, we made a CD which had some of our best recordings and submitted it at work and to other people with a brief survey for the listener to circle either AGREE, DISAGREE, or UNDECIDED as to whether they heard the same voice and believed it was saying the same thing as we did. And of course, several EVPs (electronic voice phenomenon) had an agreement rate of over 95% of nearly 30 people. I am not debating the existence of EVPs using a recorder and a source of white noise, TV static, etc., for the conduit. I am asking you for a plausible explanation that would explain voices saying your name, sometimes vulgar words, etc., with such clarity that witnesses all agree on what is being said but have no explanation as to how or why they are showing up on a recording of of a frequency with nothing audible on it when not recording. And one last thought... how could such clear voices and sounds (sometimes very loud in nature but yet inaudible while not being recorded) be showing up on *any* frequency with a squelch level of only 1 or 2? I thought perhaps the audio cable to the recorder acted like some sort of antenna but in reality it's not even hooked into the external antenna jack. Anyway, I'd rather at times believe there *are no* spirits that followed me back, which is why I'm trying one last time to come to a plausible conclusion which would explain away the voices which have been picked up on tape, recorded, and catalogued for the record. Thank you for helping to solve this mystery... Jeff Inviting spirits to come calling is really not such a good idea, is it? Bullwinkle: "Ennie Meenie, chili beanie, the spirits are about to speak!" Rocky: "Are they friendly spirits?" Bullwinkle: "Just Listen". Then the commercials began. definitely evil spirits. Hopefully a little levity will go a long way. |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
|
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
One Hung Low wrote: If "the spirits" are so technically savvy, why can't they figure out how to just whisper in your ear? wrote: Many of them do - but that would involve someone who is sensitive. Well, one might think it would ultimately be easier for them to find someone who is sensitive rather than for them trying to find someone who has radios, scanners, white noise, de-noiser software and only particular brands of tape recorders. |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
One Hung Low wrote:
Again, aren't there any good people buried there? Why wouldn't a "good spirit" follow you home? Perhaps the "good people" are in a higher plane of existence and have no reason to stick around a lonely desolate cemetery? I'm only speaking from the tone of the voices I heard - the majority of them, that is. I did pick up the voice of an older lady saying "Walk after Jesus" and mentioning the Bible. But any positive spirits were definitely outnumbered. Is all that RF voice chatter solely due to them bitching about the vandalism? (this seems to be the case, as you said you heard -no- voices in an un-vandalized cemetery). If they are so aggrieved by the vandalism, why didn't they follow home the people who did the vandalizing? Why are they bothering innocent bystanders who had nothing to do with the vandalism? They probably did, just as they did to people who visited my house during these experiments. Now one co-worker claims he has a ghost in his house and my relative things they followed me to her house as well. One thing's certain - ever since I boycotted EVP because of the vulgar language there aren't as many spirits hanging around I feel - which means they probably got bored due to the lack of my enthusiasm to communicate, and decided to harass other people who were more in tune with them. Jeff |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
One Hung Low wrote:
Well, one might think it would ultimately be easier for them to find someone who is sensitive rather than for them trying to find someone who has radios, scanners, white noise, de-noiser software and only particular brands of tape recorders. Indeed, but how many sensitives do you know visit cemeteries to communicate with the dead? They have enough problems blocking them out of their bedroom. I was told by one sensitive that spirits know when a person is sensitive - like a flashlight beam in a darkened room - and they attach themselves around that person in hopes of communicating important messages. Many people have died with unresolved issues, and if there are such things as spirits and ghosts and free will, it would make sense that many would choose to stick around in this plane to either communicate or simply watch what is going on. The next best thing to a sensitive would be someone with equipment to detect their presence. Obviously, with me going into that cemetery on countless occassions and pleading with them to communicate any way possible, and calling them by first name, I was taking an inviting approach and also promising them I would continue to communicate and help get their messages through. Perhaps I should've been more stern. As far as denoiser software, it is only used to filter out the white noise and bring out nearly inaudible voices so the human ear can better understand them. Again, it works with inaudible human voices, and for whatever reason it also works for inaudible voices that are of an unknown origin, pointing to the fact that they are indeed voices, and if you would listen to just one of my recordings, you would definitely throw the "brain/pattern" theory out the window. Jeff |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
Please, I really am confused as to why the spirits would dick around
with scanners, white noise, RF, de-noiser software and all that technical mumbo-jumbo. Brilliant minds have often had trouble communicating their ideas to others. But that's another story. Considering spirits are made up of energy, they obviously need energy to communicate and implant their voices onto our equipment. One of the most brilliant minds ever, Thomas Edison, along with Marconi, Crookes, and many of the greatest scientists of the 20th century all believed it was possible to communicate with the dead through radio. I think any one of them would be smarter than most everyone in this group, and they obviously had a good reason to believe this was possible. The first EVPs showed up in the 1920s. Science has had all that time to explain them away, only more and more evidence is showing up to discount traditional theories. Forgive me for pointing it out, but your understanding of spirits is pathetically crude. They are not physical beings, or energy beings. They manifest and express themselves through the human mind, which projects their expressions outward (so to speak) and translates them into terms human consciousness is able to comprehend. White noise provides a convenient matrix for them to communicate, since the human mind is ever anxious to pick recognizable patterns out of chaos. However, they are not able to physically impress their voices on recording devices, since they do not have voices, in any mechanical sense. For the same reason they cannot be photographed, since they do not have physical bodies. |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
If "the spirits" are so technically savvy, why can't they figure out how
to just whisper in your ear? wrote: Many of them do - but that would involve someone who is sensitive. Well, one might think it would ultimately be easier for them to find someone who is sensitive rather than for them trying to find someone who has radios, scanners, white noise, de-noiser software and only particular brands of tape recorders. When spirits communicate, they often rely on the innate tendency of the human mind to make sense out of chaos, to impose order on disordered systems. It is easier for them to impress the human mind with the illusion of a voice, for example, if there is a background noise that encourages the false impression of a voice or voices -- the sound of a motor, or rain falling, or even the wind. Spirits do not actually have voices, but in order to communicate clearly and explicitly they must express their thoughts in a way that human minds are able to deal with -- in words. They cannot form actual words, but they can trigger the impression of words in the human mind, and this is easier with the help of some background noise conducive to the impression of voices. |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
Probally the good dead people's spirits go to Heaven.Could be it's the
bad dead people's spirits that follow you home from the grave yards. cuhulin |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
They got bored???
cuhulin |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
|
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
Yeah,there is a book titled Lucid Dreaming.(check with Amazon or your
local book stores,look it up on the internet I have the book (although I haven't read it) floatin around here somewhere.I bought it at the Goodwill store about twelve years ago.Speaking of the Goodwill store,y'all want to know what I bought over there this afternoon? cuhulin .................................................. ............. Sing it Heiny!,The Enemy Below movie on tv right now. www.amctv.com .................................................. ............. |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
Better watchout,,, them spooks and hobgoblins are gonna gitcha.
cuhulin |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
|
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
|
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
|
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
Al Smith wrote:
Forgive me for pointing it out, but your understanding of spirits is pathetically crude. They are not physical beings, or energy beings. Considering that spirits have a consciousness and a soul (after all, we're not talking about wine spirits here) then there would have to be some sort of energy existing within that soul. How could a spirit reason, project its voice onto tape, manifest, or insert itself into a dream if it wasn't energy? They manifest and express themselves through the human mind, which projects their expressions outward (so to speak) and One theory behind EVP was that the voices were actually coming from the experimenter's mind. Experiments using conscious manipulation proved futile and there was no telepathic link from the mind to the recording. If you are talking about something else (through who's human mind - ours or theirs?) translates them into terms human consciousness is able to comprehend. White noise provides a convenient matrix for them to communicate, since the human mind is ever anxious to pick recognizable patterns out of chaos. However, they are not able to physically impress their voices on recording devices, since they do not have voices, in any mechanical sense. You're referring to a physical voice? It's hard to define a voice since a voice isn't a physical object, but sound waves. Then you have voices travelling through radio waves which you can't detect unless you have an antenna and the proper gadgetry. According to EVP theory, there are two ways a spirit can communicate - telepathically and *through speaking* - we don't hear them because we can't see them, though sometimes people do hear voices and instantly dismiss them as an overactive imagination. Again, this goes more into the "how" - which if anyone easily knew the answer, then there would be no debate. they cannot be photographed, since they do not have physical bodies. Images of the deceased (not including orbs or other white anamolies, but actual facial images) have shown up in photographs for centuries. Many were hoaxes, but many more cannot be proven a hoax. You can't dismiss *every* photograph because you believe they can't be photographed. In fact, cameras pick up *many* things the human eye cannot, and stuff like different nanometers of light which we don't see aren't exactly physical. Jeff |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
Al Smith wrote: When spirits communicate, they often rely on the innate tendency of the human mind to make sense out of chaos, to impose order on disordered systems. It is easier for them to impress the human mind with the illusion of a voice, for example, if there is a background noise that encourages the false impression of a voice or voices -- the sound of a motor, or rain falling, or even the You're missing the point. The voice is not an illusion, but an actual auditory manifestation on tape. Whisper as loud as you can a brief phrase and you'll get an idea on how clear and imposing these voices are. It's one thing to just sit and listen to white noise, imagining voices or images (which I truly believe happens - imagination, just like seeing faces in smoke and clouds), but the whole idea of *recording* the white noise is to produce a tangible record of their existence. Most are too weak to be argued anything astronomically amazing, but some are so loud and clear that you *know* it's not the human mind playing tricks on you. Something or someone put that voice there, and it wasn't heard during the recording process, so if any theory makes more sense it would be the rectification theory since the mind cannot imagine a voice and suddenly have it appear on the recording. Afterall, the mind *does not hear* anything when the recording is going on - only afterwards. wind. Spirits do not actually have voices, but in order to communicate clearly and explicitly they must express their thoughts in a way that human minds are able to deal with -- in words. They cannot form actual words, but they can trigger the impression of words in the human mind, and this is easier with the help of some background noise conducive to the impression of voices. I see your point, but until you do a recording yourself and pick up a voice speaking your name or of some other relevance in a loud and clear manner then you really haven't understood EVP, because trust me - it'll leave you scratching your head and probably invoke a little fear for first-timers. Jeff |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
|
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
Slow Code wrote: I wouldn't soil my email address by sending a message to Coast to Coast. I tend to agree - most of what is talked about on Coast to Coast is ridiculous. I may believe in EVP and ITC, but I have my limits, but I also don't put EVP and ITC in the same class as aliens, mind control conspiracies, and so on. EVP is a proven phenomenon which can be repeated consistently with results (but not always right away). And I believe EVP to be a valid scientific experiment - an ongoing one, since nobody has definitively come out to explain it away. |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
She owns the couch.If she is on her couch (seeeee,I usually lounge on my
left side on her couch) or on the floor and she needs to go out in the front yard,she slurps out my right ear.On the other hand if I am sitting upright on her couch and if she is on the floor and she needs to go out in the front yard,she is subject to slurp out either one of my ears. cuhulin |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
It isn't complicated at all.As soon as she got house broken,she figured
out on her own to slurp out my ears when she needs to go out in the front yard.American Kennel Club says Australian Cattle Dogs are highly intelligent. www.acdca.org www.cattledog.com cuhulin |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
It takes physical power to push/vibrate air so that we can hear/listen
to whichever sound or sounds.Ghosts and spirits can not push air around. cuhulin .................................................. ...... In Space,no one can hear you scream .................................................. ...... |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
Forgive me for pointing it out, but your understanding of spirits
is pathetically crude. They are not physical beings, or energy beings. Considering that spirits have a consciousness and a soul (after all, we're not talking about wine spirits here) then there would have to be some sort of energy existing within that soul. How could a spirit reason, project its voice onto tape, manifest, or insert itself into a dream if it wasn't energy? If you know what a soul is, then you are ahead of me and most of the philosophers of the past two thousand years. I cannot refute that spirits have souls because (a) I have no sense myself of what a soul is, and (b) I have no way of knowing what you mean by "soul." Spirits are the same as us, except they do not usually have sustained control over bodies of flesh and blood. Are we energy? I put it to you that if we were stripped of all our flesh and bone, we could not be measured, any more than the essence (soul?) of a dead person can be measured after it "leaves" its corpse. Similarly, spirits cannot be measured directly by machine, and therefore cannot be said to possess energy or be made of energy. What they can do is affect the human brain and nervous system, just as we can. Their control is (usually) not as extensive or as refined as our own. We learn to control our bodies from birth, whereas spirits only get a chance to drive a body of flesh during partial or complete possession (which is quite common, by the way). While a spirit is controlling a body, partially or completely, it can affect that body, and can use that body to affect its environment. These effects can be measured and recorded, and have energy. Point is, all things tangible and persistent about a spirit require a body of flesh. It is our memories that define our personalities, our very identities. Spirits outside flesh do not have memories. Hence they have no definite identities. They can develop identities only when they begin to interact with living minds encased in flesh. This interaction may be passive -- they may do no more than observe -- but the interaction allows them to acquire a sense of self. They manifest and express themselves through the human mind, which projects their expressions outward (so to speak) and One theory behind EVP was that the voices were actually coming from the experimenter's mind. Experiments using conscious manipulation proved futile and there was no telepathic link from the mind to the recording. If you are talking about something else (through who's human mind - ours or theirs?) It's simplistic to say that spirit voices come from the mind of the perceiver. The mind of a human being is used by a spirit to enable it to articulate itself. It does not speak, even though it may seem to speak -- it creates the illusion of a voice by manipulating the inner perceptions of the hearer. The only way a spirit can speak is to possess its host, and then use the physical voice of that person to express itself in words. There is no such thing as a disembodied spirit voice, although there is often the very real perception of a disembodied spirit voice. Just as the image in a dream is not seen with the physical eyes, a disembodied spirit voice is not heard with the ears -- it only seems to be heard with the ears. The illusion is perfect. Often times a spirit voice cannot be distinguished from the voice of a physical speaker. translates them into terms human consciousness is able to comprehend. White noise provides a convenient matrix for them to communicate, since the human mind is ever anxious to pick recognizable patterns out of chaos. However, they are not able to physically impress their voices on recording devices, since they do not have voices, in any mechanical sense. You're referring to a physical voice? It's hard to define a voice since a voice isn't a physical object, but sound waves. Then you have voices travelling through radio waves which you can't detect unless you have an antenna and the proper gadgetry. According to EVP theory, there are two ways a spirit can communicate - telepathically and *through speaking* - we don't hear them because we can't see them, though sometimes people do hear voices and instantly dismiss them as an overactive imagination. Again, this goes more into the "how" - which if anyone easily knew the answer, then there would be no debate. Spirits do not rely on radio to speak. Rather, they rely on the white noise of static to supply a kind of textured background that allows them to more easily manipulate the auditory perceptions of the listener so that the listener gets the illusion of having heard spoken words. When I refer to white noise, I mean any chaotic background of an audible kind. they cannot be photographed, since they do not have physical bodies. Images of the deceased (not including orbs or other white anamolies, but actual facial images) have shown up in photographs for centuries. Many were hoaxes, but many more cannot be proven a hoax. You can't dismiss *every* photograph because you believe they can't be photographed. I can indeed dismiss all spirit photographs, because I know that spirits have no physical bodies of any kind. They are no more physical than the figures we see in our dreams. They cannot impress photographic film with an image. What they can do is convince suggestible individuals that vague shapes in photographs are spirit figures. They are able to modify perception so that what to one person would seem no more than a meaningless blur appears, to a susceptible person, the face of a spiritual being. It is all done in the mind. Spirits manipulate human minds, not the physical world. In fact, cameras pick up *many* things the human eye cannot, and stuff like different nanometers of light which we don't see aren't exactly physical. Jeff Energy is physical. Matter and energy are, at root, one and the same. What is not physical is a pattern. A pattern requires a physical matrix, but it is independent of the matrix upon which it is based. Letters of the alphabet, for example, must be inscribed on something to be perceived, or at least imagined in the mind, but they are not a part of the base that supports their manifest forms. They are ideals in the Platonic sense. They exist apart from matter -- however, apart from matter their existence cannot be measured or recorded. Or think of it this way. A spirit is like a piece of music. It is a pattern that requires physical media to express itself, but is not the physical media by which it is expressed. Music is not the sound -- the sound is only its vehicle. Similarly, spirits require human minds to express themselves, but they are not a part of human minds -- yet apart from human minds they lack form or identity. Their abstract nature becomes manifest when they are filtered through our brains. On their own, they don't have bodies, they don't have forms, they don't have voices. Exactly what they are is beyond our comprehension, since they are unlike everything we think we know. My belief is that they are beings of higher dimensions who are able to insert themselves into our awareness (what we think of as reality) via our minds. They put on forms, identities, voices, to interact with us, but they put them on as we would put on a suit of clothing. However, it is a curious property of spirits that the identities they assume become truly their identities for them. Just as our identities over time become us. Spirits do not often lie about who they are -- they truly believe they are the poses them adopt in order to interact with human beings. |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
Spirits do not actually have voices, but in order to
communicate clearly and explicitly they must express their thoughts in a way that human minds are able to deal with -- in words. They cannot form actual words, but they can trigger the impression of words in the human mind, and this is easier with the help of some background noise conducive to the impression of voices. I see your point, but until you do a recording yourself and pick up a voice speaking your name or of some other relevance in a loud and clear manner then you really haven't understood EVP, because trust me - it'll leave you scratching your head and probably invoke a little fear for first-timers. Jeff There is the question of poltergeist phenomena -- the possibility that a spirit can, in some unknown manner, use the energies of a human host to cause changes in the physical environment in nonstandard ways. I think this kind of event may occur, based on the recorded eye-witness evidence for it, but it is also possible that some other factor is at work (deception used by the possessed host; self-deception on the part of the witnesses). If poltergeists exist, then it is not beyond possibility that spirits can use human energies to modify physical recording devices. I tend to believe this does not happen, but I would not dismiss the possibility out of hand. |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
Once you examine the
strongest evidence, you can only conclude that yes, indeed it's a voice, but where did it come from and why does it even sound like a dead person would? Jeff Dead persons can't talk, so they don't sound like anything. If you mean spooky horror film voices, sometimes the cliche is the reality. Spirits do talk in weird ways. They shout, they curse, they growl, they whisper. Or so it seems to our awareness. My own theory is that part of the reason that both spirit voices and spirit faces are so often distorted is that spirits lack perfect control over our minds, and so they express themselves imperfectly. It's like trying to drive a car when you've never learned to drive. You go jerking and weaving all over the place. It takes practice. Maybe some spirits just never get the knack. |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
If "the spirits" are so technically savvy, why can't they figure out how to just whisper in your ear? wrote: Many of them do - but that would involve someone who is sensitive. Well, one might think it would ultimately be easier for them to find someone who is sensitive rather than for them trying to find someone who has radios, scanners, white noise, de-noiser software and only particular brands of tape recorders. Al Smith wrote: Spirits do not actually have voices, But they are good RF engineers? They cannot form actual words, They cannot form actual words, but they -CAN- generate an AF modulated (with actual words) RF signal? Really, now? Please, don't expect the rest of us to be as gullible as you. :-( |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
Spirits,,,,,,,
Life is likeeeeeee,,,,, a Mountain Railroaddd, with an Engineeerrrr,who is brave,,,,,, We must makeeee the run sucessfullll,from the craaaadle to the gravvvvve,,,,,,,, Keep your handddd upon the Throttle,and your Eyyyyes upon the Rail,,,,,,,,,, cuhulin |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
I think poltergeist only jump into mixed up peoples bodies.Those people
need to see a shrink and get their minds straightened out and then they should have no more problems with poltergeist. cuhulin,the Exorist |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
In article xazFg.9577$Ch.6327@clgrps13,
Al Smith wrote: Forgive me for pointing it out, but your understanding of spirits is pathetically crude. They are not physical beings, or energy beings. Considering that spirits have a consciousness and a soul (after all, we're not talking about wine spirits here) then there would have to be some sort of energy existing within that soul. How could a spirit reason, project its voice onto tape, manifest, or insert itself into a dream if it wasn't energy? If you know what a soul is, If you had a soul or a conscience you would drop rec.radio.shortwave off the news group header since this is off topic crap. Plonk -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
Metinks what I needs me is a barely legal age 18 year old virgin girl to
shack up with me. cuhulin |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
jeff, you seem to say that the voice is actually a recorded waveform on
your recording medium, and not an imagined meaning in your own mind. if this is so then it takes physical forces to impose order on the random hash present. even if the energy output is very miniscule it still takes a physical force to even manipulate electrons into some kind of recognisable data. not to mention the intelligent knowledge of various recording methods and media needed to affect the successful transfer of communication. a different recording method would be useful to help sort this out. i propose this.... a box. a sealed closed box with a glass top. a tube could be inserted to introduce one single puff of talc, or baking flower or fingerprint dust or even cigarette smoke. if there are spooks and they are able to manipulate forces or circumstances that can have any effect on your recorder, then to control the movement and distribution of this dust should be easy. as it falls, it could display written words, or images just as before. after all this is just a very primitive form of recording. it only requires some form of control over the tiny particles, similar to magnetizing a signal on the tiny magnetic particles of recording tape but requiring less energy and less knowledge on the part of the spook. if no unusual patterns are evident in our "primitive" recording then i propose that the images imposed on the sophisticated recordings are suspect. i am sure that many other methods of recording could be thought up. maybe an etch-a-sketch screen? powdered iron on a sheet of paper? stir up something into water to see how it settles out? any of these should be easily influenced compared to the electronic recorder. |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
Last night,I watched some Bela Lugosi movies on tv.The Devil Bat and The
Body Snatcher.None of them talked. cuhulin |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
Telamon wrote in
: In article xazFg.9577$Ch.6327@clgrps13, Al Smith wrote: Forgive me for pointing it out, but your understanding of spirits is pathetically crude. They are not physical beings, or energy beings. Considering that spirits have a consciousness and a soul (after all, we're not talking about wine spirits here) then there would have to be some sort of energy existing within that soul. How could a spirit reason, project its voice onto tape, manifest, or insert itself into a dream if it wasn't energy? If you know what a soul is, If you had a soul or a conscience you would drop rec.radio.shortwave off the news group header since this is off topic crap. Plonk ROFL |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
Telamon wrote:
Forgive me for pointing it out, but your understanding of spirits is pathetically crude. They are not physical beings, or energy beings. Considering that spirits have a consciousness and a soul (after all, we're not talking about wine spirits here) then there would have to be some sort of energy existing within that soul. How could a spirit reason, project its voice onto tape, manifest, or insert itself into a dream if it wasn't energy? If you know what a soul is, If you had a soul or a conscience you would drop rec.radio.shortwave off the news group header since this is off topic crap. Plonk If -YOU- had a conscience (or half a brain), you would realize that you are being a pompous, hypocritical jackass, condemning others for -exactly- what you have done over 300 times. Your Pal, Plonk |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
Plonk-B-Gone wrote in
: Telamon wrote: Forgive me for pointing it out, but your understanding of spirits is pathetically crude. They are not physical beings, or energy beings. Considering that spirits have a consciousness and a soul (after all, we're not talking about wine spirits here) then there would have to be some sort of energy existing within that soul. How could a spirit reason, project its voice onto tape, manifest, or insert itself into a dream if it wasn't energy? If you know what a soul is, If you had a soul or a conscience you would drop rec.radio.shortwave off the news group header since this is off topic crap. Plonk If -YOU- had a conscience (or half a brain), you would realize that you are being a pompous, hypocritical jackass, condemning others for -exactly- what you have done over 300 times. Your Pal, Plonk ROFL, Telamon can't just quietly plonk someone, he has to do it with fanfare. He can't read this because I'm plonked too. I followed-up to too many cuhulin posts in one day. That's what got me plonked. LOL. But I ain't gonna ignore my buddy cuhulin. SC |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
In article ,
Plonk-B-Gone wrote: Telamon wrote: Forgive me for pointing it out, but your understanding of spirits is pathetically crude. They are not physical beings, or energy beings. Considering that spirits have a consciousness and a soul (after all, we're not talking about wine spirits here) then there would have to be some sort of energy existing within that soul. How could a spirit reason, project its voice onto tape, manifest, or insert itself into a dream if it wasn't energy? If you know what a soul is, If you had a soul or a conscience you would drop rec.radio.shortwave off the news group header since this is off topic crap. Plonk If -YOU- had a conscience (or half a brain), you would realize that you are being a pompous, hypocritical jackass, condemning others for -exactly- what you have done over 300 times. Your Pal, Plonk Same clueless idiot, different handle. Plonk -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
Telamon wrote:
If you had a soul or a conscience you would drop rec.radio.shortwave off the news group header since this is off topic crap. Plonk Plonk-B-Gone wrote: If -YOU- had a conscience (or half a brain), you would realize that you are being a pompous, hypocritical jackass, condemning others for -exactly- what you have done over 300 times. Your Pal, Plonk Same clueless idiot, different handle. Plonk Now a little refresher from a few months ago: Telamon wrote: I for one would appreciate it if the political nut cases would stick to the off topic flame threads or start their own thread. Whatever wrote: Time for some irony and hypocrisy. Just a small sample. http://tinyurl.com/pz8do "Carter, K8VT" wrote: Very interesting...320 posts, almost all of them political per se, not complaints about OT posts. (Sorry, didn't have time to read all 320, but the ones I did read *clearly* demonstrated the irony). I think "hypocrisy" defines our boy up on his high horse quite well. Yet another example of "Do as I say, not as I do". Telamon wrote: You and whatever have a high number of off posts. You and whatever generally do not post helpful replies to questions. You and whatever can point back to a period of time during a contentious election and that's it for me but you and whatever are a different story. Do continue looking like a clueless jackass as you do in most of your posts. Carter, K8VT wrote: As you *still* don't get it, *you* appear to be the "clueless jackass". Telamon wrote: I'm not a hypocrite. I contribute a lot of on topic and helpful posts to this news group and I don't feel the need to justify my posting history to someone with your poor posting history. Your recent AND long time posting history is most off topic political posts. This is the only post in two days so it is clear to me that you just want to ague and denigrate me so into the kill file with you. Plonk Carter, K8VT wrote: First, sorry to drag this thread on, but you still don't seem to get it. Next, maybe you do need to justify your posting history as this is really at the heart of the debate... * you accused and chastised me (and others) of a "high number" of OT posts. * 'Whatever' called your bluff, did some research and caught *you* with your pants down--*320* OT posts (while I have of 146 posts total, maybe 100 OT). That would seem to make *you* the winner of the "High Number" award, not others. Sort of like a guy with 320 traffic tickets calling a guy with 100 tickets a bad driver. * When you accuse people of doing something wrong and then it comes to pass that *you* have done the same "wrong" thing almost *three* times as often, then, yes, you *should* justify your posting history or be exposed for the hypocrite you are. As to your trying to justify your 320 OTs because you post on topic also--well, that's a little like a bank robber saying it's OK to rob banks because he gives some of the money to charity. NOT! OT is OT and your 320 trumps my 100. Period [.] Telamon wrote: so into the kill file with you. Plonk Carter wrote: Thought I was already there(!) but, please, do so again. It's getting too hard to follow your illogic, denials, dodging, weaseling and bogus "justification" of *YOUR* 320 OTs. |
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices
In article L2%Gg.5907$jX.1972@trndny06,
Whatever wrote: Telamon wrote: If you had a soul or a conscience you would drop rec.radio.shortwave off the news group header since this is off topic crap. Plonk Plonk-B-Gone wrote: If -YOU- had a conscience (or half a brain), you would realize that you are being a pompous, hypocritical jackass, condemning others for -exactly- what you have done over 300 times. Your Pal, Plonk Same clueless idiot, different handle. Plonk Now a little refresher from a few months ago: Snip Plonk -- Telamon Ventura, California |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com