| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bob Miller ) writes:
There is absolutely no reason in the world to use a switching supply for this. The radio doesn't require much current, but the switching supply will be far noisier than a linear supply unless it's really carefully filtered and shielded. Michael Well, switching or linear, whatever. The point is, if the Sony AC adaptor is so hard to find, and it's $100, a small, conventional power supply would suffice. A communications-quality switching supply would work (all ham transceivers nowadays are paired up with such critters), or a standard linear supply. But the reason transceivers use switching supplies is because on transmit a lot of power is needed. That requirement isn't there for just a receiver. But the "cost" of a switching supply in the application is the noise, or the real cost of something carefully filtered and shielded, or doing it yourself, to keep that noise to a minimum. But that cost has no return, since the receiver requires so little current that a linear supply will be small and not heavy, and efficienty will not be an issue. Michael |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FS: Coax Adapters & Connectors | Swap | |||
| FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Antenna | |||
| FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Equipment | |||
| FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
| FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Equipment | |||