Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Has anyone tried the RP2100 with the new, remote SSB module? It this
arrangement stable enough for decent SSB operation and is the tuning ratio low enough without backlash? Any comments on this would be appreciated. The reviews on the RP2100 by itself seem to be pretty good considering the price. Thanks, Frank Tucson, AZ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dorpmuller wrote: wrote in message oups.com... wrote: Has anyone tried the RP2100 with the new, remote SSB module? It this arrangement stable enough for decent SSB operation and is the tuning ratio low enough without backlash? Any comments on this would be appreciated. The reviews on the RP2100 by itself seem to be pretty good considering the price. Thanks, Frank Tucson, AZ I'm trying to figure out the attraction of a shortwave radio that you have to buy a separate battery powered outboard module in order to decode ssb. There are receivers available for comparable prices that have ssb included. I have the 2100 with the module. For 56 bucks without it I wasn't gonna complain... it's a good asskicker on MW, has better sensitivity on the whip than anything else I've had, has really nice audio for program listening and is plain good looking. I have the module-had to try it-it works fine but I haven't used it for extended listening yet. It tunes like any other unit with a generic BFO control. I'm sure it works, as many cobbled together projects do. Since there is a Degen DE1103 and many other radios available for about the same price that doesn't require the use of 8 batteries plus an outboard module to decode SSB I guess I don't see the point of the 2100 for ssb work. It seems like a pieced together arrangement. Rich |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, I don't think I said I was going to buy it. I was just
curious about how it works. I apologize if my innate curiosity offends you thriftyness. Frank wrote: Dorpmuller wrote: wrote in message oups.com... wrote: Has anyone tried the RP2100 with the new, remote SSB module? It this arrangement stable enough for decent SSB operation and is the tuning ratio low enough without backlash? Any comments on this would be appreciated. The reviews on the RP2100 by itself seem to be pretty good considering the price. Thanks, Frank Tucson, AZ I'm trying to figure out the attraction of a shortwave radio that you have to buy a separate battery powered outboard module in order to decode ssb. There are receivers available for comparable prices that have ssb included. I have the 2100 with the module. For 56 bucks without it I wasn't gonna complain... it's a good asskicker on MW, has better sensitivity on the whip than anything else I've had, has really nice audio for program listening and is plain good looking. I have the module-had to try it-it works fine but I haven't used it for extended listening yet. It tunes like any other unit with a generic BFO control. I'm sure it works, as many cobbled together projects do. Since there is a Degen DE1103 and many other radios available for about the same price that doesn't require the use of 8 batteries plus an outboard module to decode SSB I guess I don't see the point of the 2100 for ssb work. It seems like a pieced together arrangement. Rich |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey no problem here with your curiousity Frank as long as you aren't
offended by my top posting. I like the looks of the radio and I think I am going to buy one someday soon. I have heard, and seems Rich will concur, that it sounds good too. I have a DE1103 and I only use the speaker to listen to at very low volume to put me to sleep. It sounds horrible otherwise. I listen to Laura Ingraham and those John & Jay guys from the west coast. They're on FM here in Boston late at night. Ok, so back to the RP2100. What I also like about it is that I hear that it has an IF output jack. I am going to do some experimenting with precision detectors and filters and sync detectors and so forth. I think the RP2100 may be a good economical platform for that kind of work. regards, NEO wrote: Actually, I don't think I said I was going to buy it. I was just curious about how it works. I apologize if my innate curiosity offends you thriftyness. Frank wrote: Dorpmuller wrote: wrote in message oups.com... wrote: Has anyone tried the RP2100 with the new, remote SSB module? It this arrangement stable enough for decent SSB operation and is the tuning ratio low enough without backlash? Any comments on this would be appreciated. The reviews on the RP2100 by itself seem to be pretty good considering the price. Thanks, Frank Tucson, AZ I'm trying to figure out the attraction of a shortwave radio that you have to buy a separate battery powered outboard module in order to decode ssb. There are receivers available for comparable prices that have ssb included. I have the 2100 with the module. For 56 bucks without it I wasn't gonna complain... it's a good asskicker on MW, has better sensitivity on the whip than anything else I've had, has really nice audio for program listening and is plain good looking. I have the module-had to try it-it works fine but I haven't used it for extended listening yet. It tunes like any other unit with a generic BFO control. I'm sure it works, as many cobbled together projects do. Since there is a Degen DE1103 and many other radios available for about the same price that doesn't require the use of 8 batteries plus an outboard module to decode SSB I guess I don't see the point of the 2100 for ssb work. It seems like a pieced together arrangement. Rich |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Newbie question | Shortwave | |||
New odd question | Antenna | |||
Need Information on RF Power Module | Homebrew | |||
Modifying the THD7.pm Perl module to work on Windows | General | |||
HP 1801A Vertical Amplifier Plug-In Module for 180 Series Oscilloscope | Swap |