Neutrons fly through Earth (and our bodies too) without even slowing
down.Somewhere in America,underground,there is a big tank of pure water
and scientist use that tank of water and equipment to catch the tracks
of Neutrons.Or is it Nuetrinos? I once read about that in National
Geographics magazine many years ago.
cuhulin

wrote:
Neutrons fly through Earth (and our bodies too) without even slowing
down.Somewhere in America,underground,there is a big tank of pure water
and scientist use that tank of water and equipment to catch the tracks
of Neutrons.Or is it Nuetrinos? I once read about that in National
Geographics magazine many years ago.
cuhulin

Neutrinos - you were right the second time. These little babies are so
tiny and of such high energy that they are hard to capture or even
detect.

Neutrons, however, being big and heavy, pretty much stop on collision
with anything, once released from an atom.

Bruce Jensen

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Mike wrote:
...

U R an idiot

Yes, U R.

Mike

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
It's a particle that has no mass, yet it can impart momentum and it
travels through space or air in a transverse wave motion but it is not a
wave and it has no charge but it carries the force of electromagnetic
fields as it travels through space.

Well stated.

I'm sticking with Maxwell for now.

Good idea!

Mike

"bpnjensen" wrote in message
ups.com...
Radio signals are photons, little quanta of light energy, which have
characteristics of both particles and waves. They are characteristic
of particles, in part, in that they do not require a "medium" through
which to travel and can physically impinge upon other particles. They
are characteristic of waves in that they can be seen to resonate at
specific frequencies and interfere with wave characteristics of other
quanta. And vice-versa. Please excuse the imprecision in my language,
it's been awhile.

VERY well stated, and your language was fine.

I doubt that "John Smith" will get it, however.

Mike

Did anybody ever ask Albert Einstein about that?
cuhulin

BruceMN44 wrote:
John Smith,
You seem to be consumed by this ether subject yet you give no current
references, only historical data from the early 1920's. You seem to
enjoy the attention this thread has generated, yet offer nothing even
remotely update on this subject. Fact of the mater you have taken
ether beyond theoretical physics and have tried to apply it to applied
physics...Antenna radiating waves through an ether!!!! I feel you are
have made a leap that hasn't been proven scienticically by experiment
yet! Only theory in some circles...which rise and fall with eb
scientific conjecture. Bruce


Bruce:

You are correct, no recent data and we CANNOT see or prove the ether.
But, at your disposal, you DO have logic ...

Waves require a medium, if you propose radio does not require waves, and
some other form of transfer is being had when radio energy leaves the
xmitting antenna to arrive at the receiving antenna--you may, indeed, be
correct. But, until you can prove that, the ether stays ...

Regards,
JS

wrote:
Neutrons fly through Earth (and our bodies too) without even slowing
down.Somewhere in America,underground,there is a big tank of pure water
and scientist use that tank of water and equipment to catch the tracks
of Neutrons.Or is it Nuetrinos? I once read about that in National
Geographics magazine many years ago.
cuhulin


Neutrons DO genetic damage, thank God that had nothing to do with our
antennas!

JS

bpnjensen wrote:
...

Can I construct a "cloud chamber" to "see" what you claim, if not, how
can I construct an experiment to prove what you say. If I cannot verify
what you say, DO YOU REALLY WANT TO CLAIM THAT?

Regards,
JS

Mike wrote:
...

Mike:

I get a lot of things, you believe in particles emitting from our
antennas, as opposed to waves--great, my antenna is a proton emitting
device, yeah. LOL!

Damn, I wish all the books would quit referring to "Radio Waves" and
start talking about proton emitting xmitters! Damn dummies! LOL!

Regards,
JS