In article , "Mike"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
OK,go look at your cute clocks and your cute wris****ches and on tv and
everywhere else y'all see ''Time'',,,, keep on believing in
y'allselfs.''Time'' does not exist,NO such thing.

Of course it exists. It is the 4th dimension.

Example: when you make plans to meet someone - say for lunch - how many
coordinates do you give? You say "meet me at Harry's diner at main and
3rd, at 1:00 o'clock". You give 4 coordinates - 3 physical and one of
time.

Length, width, height, duration. There are (at least) 4 dimensions. Saying
WHERE something exists is meaningless without saying WHEN it exists. Did
Harry's diner exist at 3rd and Main 1 year ago? A million years ago?

Clocks are just the measuring stick. Just as physical dimensions exist
independently of feet, meters, and light-years, time exists independently of
what we use to measure it.

Clocks, inches, sundials, kilometers, decaying atoms, light-years, quartz
vibrations, the movement of Earth around the Sun etc. are all just
convenient measuring tools. They all give reference points, so we can say
things like "The restaurant is a mile north of here" or "I'll be at the
restaurant in an hour". The "mile" has no real existence, it's just an
agreed upon definition of a length of distance. Similarly, the "hour" has
no real existence, it's just an agreed upon definition of a length of time.

All of the measuring tools and terms we use to define the 4 dimensions are
purely arbitrary. What they are measuring, however, is very real. The
concepts of before, now and after are as real and universal as up, down,
left, right, forward and backward.

I don't think it a dimension like the ones you write about but there is
also spin. Spin has several qualities of its own.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
I don't think it a dimension like the ones you write about but there is
also spin. Spin has several qualities of its own.

Time is not a *physical* dimension like the others, but it is equally real
and measurable.

Does something that has 0 duration physically exist? Not in this universe.

Does something that has 0 length physically exist? Not in this universe.

Mike

In article , "Mike"
wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
I don't think it a dimension like the ones you write about but there is
also spin. Spin has several qualities of its own.

Time is not a *physical* dimension like the others, but it is equally real
and measurable.

Does something that has 0 duration physically exist? Not in this universe.

Does something that has 0 length physically exist? Not in this universe.

Yeah, I agree about time. I was mentioning spin, which is not a
dimension like the three spatial and time.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article , "Mike"
wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in
message
...


I don't think it a dimension like the ones you write about but
there is also spin. Spin has several qualities of its own.
Time is not a *physical* dimension like the others, but it is
equally real and measurable.

Does something that has 0 duration physically exist? Not in this
universe.

Does something that has 0 length physically exist? Not in this
universe.

Telamon wrote:

Yeah, I agree about time. I was mentioning spin, which is not a
dimension like the three spatial and time.

So here you are, YET AGAIN aiding and abetting a post that has
*nothing* to do with short wave. (maybe rec.physics, rec.quantum
mechanics???)

Oh, sorry. I forgot. It's OK for you, just not anyone else.

Happy Holidays anyway!

Tell-A-Troll wrote:
...
So here you are, YET AGAIN aiding and abetting a post that has
*nothing* to do with short wave. (maybe rec.physics, rec.quantum
mechanics???)

Oh, sorry. I forgot. It's OK for you, just not anyone else.

Happy Holidays anyway!


Hmmm, radio waves, their propagation methods, abilities, solar flares,
magnetic storms, antenna construction, etc. have "NOTHING TO DO WITH
THIS GROUP?"

Huh, guess you get your broadcasts via the internet! Perhaps DSL hookup
would be more suited for discussion for you ...

JS

John Smith wrote:
Tell-A-Troll wrote:
...
So here you are, YET AGAIN aiding and abetting a post that has
*nothing* to do with short wave. (maybe rec.physics, rec.quantum
mechanics???)

Oh, sorry. I forgot. It's OK for you, just not anyone else.

Happy Holidays anyway!


Hmmm, radio waves, their propagation methods, abilities, solar flares,
magnetic storms, antenna construction, etc. have "NOTHING TO DO WITH
THIS GROUP?"

Huh, guess you get your broadcasts via the internet! Perhaps DSL hookup
would be more suited for discussion for you ...

JS

Uh, JS, you're being a little selective aren't you? His total response
(which I included but you so conveniently snipped) was about "spin,
dimensions and time". Funny, but his response didn't say *anything*
about flares, storms or antenna construction.

Happy Holidays!

I have Bell South DSL for my computer and I am on the MSNTV One Plan.My
Webtv subscription doesn't cost me nuttin.It's FREE.
cuhulin
.......................................
And y'all think I am dumb.
.................................

Is there such a thingy as a rec.wimmins thingy?
cuhulin

In article ,
Tell-A-Troll wrote:

In article , "Mike"
wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in
message

igy.com. ..


I don't think it a dimension like the ones you write about but
there is also spin. Spin has several qualities of its own.
Time is not a *physical* dimension like the others, but it is
equally real and measurable.

Does something that has 0 duration physically exist? Not in this
universe.

Does something that has 0 length physically exist? Not in this
universe.

Telamon wrote:

Yeah, I agree about time. I was mentioning spin, which is not a
dimension like the three spatial and time.

So here you are, YET AGAIN aiding and abetting a post that has
*nothing* to do with short wave. (maybe rec.physics, rec.quantum
mechanics???)

Oh, sorry. I forgot. It's OK for you, just not anyone else.

Happy Holidays anyway!

If you bothered to read other related threads started by the OP the
questions revolve around how antennas work, near and far fields of
electromagnetic waves. Here there has been an argument around classical
and quantum physics and how EM waves propagate. You will have to read
other threads to make sense of it.

You however are just Trolling as usual. Must really suck to be you to
have to keep changing your handle just so people can read you after
being kill filed time and again. Maybe you could actually add something
to the discussion other than the usual Trolling crapola.

I hope you learn to wise up in the new year.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon,,,,, tell all them purty wimmins in Ventura,old Hansom Larry
(that's me) Loves them.
cuhulin