Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike wrote:
... Our watches and clocks all measure the spinning of the earth, one spin = 24 hours. Now that is all very nice and everything, and it does get me to appointments on time, but it is NOT "real." Of course it is real. The clock gets you to appointments "on time" for the same reason that directions and maps get you to appointments "on spot". Imagine just before the big bang, when all the matter in the universe sprang forth from some sub-atomic particle sized piece into all "our matter" now. And, imagine four old bearded men sitting there and observing the big bang--what do the wrist watches on their arms measure? Who knows? It doesn't really matter *what* they measure! But they clearly are measuring *something*, or they wouldn't be wearing them, right? That they have no concept of Earthly hours is irrelevent. Just like the lengths of their beards are measuring *something*, even though they don't know about inches or meters or any of our Earthly measurements of length. ... Mike What our watches measure is "something", it could just be some undiscovered quality/law of matter, and that is useful--my appointment keeping stands. However, when you start plugging these things into mathematical "laws" and NOT caring EXACTLY what they are about, it is insane, now it is useful--and one is best using such 'til better comes along ... BUT, you NEVER forget you really DON'T KNOW or DON'T UNDERSTAND what is really happening and are only substituting "magic numbers" so as to get some type of usable results ... Today there are many things we use without understanding them, this is good, but only a fool says, "Don't worry about what is really going on, this will get us where we are going." Because, without always searching the truths, we will fail to make the new discoveries and start accepting our "made up formulas" as reality. There are many examples we need to look further, only the fools stand saying we know it all, we cannot even state we absolutely know photons exist! (however, allowing that they do gives us usable theory, for the moment ...) JS |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
197 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (23-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
209 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (04-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | Policy | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (01-NOV-03) | Shortwave |