David wrote:
On 7 Jan 2007 18:01:39 -0800, wrote:


HD radio is a fraud and a farse - HD Radio has only 60% the coverage of
analog, and causes adjacent-channel interference. Sales of HD radios
have been anemic, as the general public is not buying into this joke of
a technology:

http://www.radio-info.com/smf/index....ard,194.0.html

It'll fail commercially but it definitely helps reception in some
cases.

It requires externally mounted dipole antennas - the general public is
not going to bother with this joke of a technology.

wrote in message
ups.com...

David wrote:
On 7 Jan 2007 18:01:39 -0800, wrote:


HD radio is a fraud and a farse - HD Radio has only 60% the coverage of
analog, and causes adjacent-channel interference. Sales of HD radios
have been anemic, as the general public is not buying into this joke of
a technology:

http://www.radio-info.com/smf/index....ard,194.0.html

It'll fail commercially but it definitely helps reception in some
cases.

It requires externally mounted dipole antennas - the general public is
not going to bother with this joke of a technology.

The three I have work fine in the LA basin. In fact, our AM, which is
unlistenable inside our building in analog, produces a clean HD signal at
the same location.

David Frackelton Gleason, still dreaming that he is 'Eduardo', wrote:

wrote in message
ups.com...

David wrote:
On 7 Jan 2007 18:01:39 -0800, wrote:


HD radio is a fraud and a farse - HD Radio has only 60% the coverage of
analog, and causes adjacent-channel interference. Sales of HD radios
have been anemic, as the general public is not buying into this joke of
a technology:

http://www.radio-info.com/smf/index....ard,194.0.html

It'll fail commercially but it definitely helps reception in some
cases.

It requires externally mounted dipole antennas - the general public is
not going to bother with this joke of a technology.

The three I have work fine in the LA basin. In fact, our AM, which is
unlistenable inside our building in analog, produces a clean HD signal at
the same location.

There is NO clean HD signal, it is all QRM.

Run along now, and shill elsewhere.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

David Eduardo wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

David wrote:
On 7 Jan 2007 18:01:39 -0800, wrote:


HD radio is a fraud and a farse - HD Radio has only 60% the coverage of
analog, and causes adjacent-channel interference. Sales of HD radios
have been anemic, as the general public is not buying into this joke of
a technology:

http://www.radio-info.com/smf/index....ard,194.0.html

It'll fail commercially but it definitely helps reception in some
cases.

It requires externally mounted dipole antennas - the general public is
not going to bother with this joke of a technology.

The three I have work fine in the LA basin. In fact, our AM, which is
unlistenable inside our building in analog, produces a clean HD signal at
the same location.

Still, full-of-**** - lying ******* ! Run along, HD Radio/IBOC shill !